Jump to content

User talk:It's gonna be awesome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


My talk page

[edit]



Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 09:40, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your warm and very detailed introduction! ^_^ --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 03:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About "Could you kindly help me review the paragraph written my me" in Talk:Chu_Ke-liang

[edit]

I saw it and I think it is ok. THank for your contribution.

In my opinion, I like that message appeared in my talk page instead of in the Talk:Chu_Ke-liang with a {{ping}}.--Wolfch (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! Thanks for the time! And have a nice day! ^_^ --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 02:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tag bombing

[edit]

You should read Wikipedia:Tag bombing. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Thanks for that. =) --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 12:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hong Kong Hiking Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About your edit on Yellow Line (Kaohsiung MRT)

[edit]
  1. In English Wikipedia, ROC has the same meaning as Taiwan, which is different from Chinese Wikipedia. So it is needless to show ROC and Taiwan at the same time.
  2. Template:related portals2 is commonly used in portal pages. In articles, it is better to add Template:portal bar or Template:portal box.
  3. Portals Taipei, Kaohsiung, Taichung, Taoyuan, Underground does not exist in English Wikipedia now. In my opinion, we had better create these portal page before putting them on article pages.--星巴克女王 (talk) 14:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@星巴克女王:Thank you so much for your opinions! ^_^ I just can't make sure which of ROC and Taiwan to stay. Regarding the other two suggestions, I will act accordingly. =) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 14:54, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the article on my behalf. =) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 14:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Annual meeting of PHP in Taiwan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

(Annual meeting of PHP in Taiwan和Taiwan Python Conference應該是不同的活動,PHP和Python是不同的程式語言,因此快速刪除) Wolfch (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

[edit]

Please remember to include these for new content. Added on here[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I will. =) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 02:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that you've been working on translating the amphetamine article for the Chinese Wikipedia. Since I realize the source code of that article can be very hard to navigate, feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Also, I'd be happy to translate the image text in {{Amphetamine pharmacodynamics}} and {{Psychostimulant addiction}} to Chinese (I'm assuming the article is written in written vernacular Chinese - I'm not familiar with the language; forgive my ignorance if I'm wrong ) if you're interested and can provide me with the relevant translations for the existing image text. Seppi333 (Insert ) 02:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! It's my pleasure to involve myself in the process of the translation! Keep in touch buddy! ^_^ --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 16:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Could you do me a favor?

[edit]

不好意思, 我沒辦法幫這個忙

我覺得Taiwanese Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry捐款資訊的資料, 不適合放在維基百科的條目中(中文條目及英文條目都不適合), 對一般看維基百科要了解此組織的人而言, 這個不是必要的資料, 若有意要捐助此組織的人, 自然會到組織的網站上找相關資訊--Wolfch (talk) 19:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

也因為上述的原因, 我已經刪除en:Taiwanese Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry中捐款方式的相關資料--Wolfch (talk) 19:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
了解,但學會確實需要更多的捐款才有能力做更多的事情,例如:衛教、國際參與等。--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 19:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
若希望讓社會大眾對學會捐款, 請用其他的方式告知社會大眾, 維基百科不是合適的管道, 像World Vision InternationalAmerican Heart Association也沒有有關捐款的章節。--Wolfch (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see. If anything, I hope you will be willing to check the existence of {{Psychiatry}} in the Chinese Wikipedia. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 04:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
目前中文維基沒有對應模版, 而我暫時也沒有打算要創建此一模版。--Wolfch (talk) 16:50, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re:

[edit]

有關"心得安", 應該是對應Propranolol, 已改為"普萘洛尔", 另外, 您提的 syntax error, 不太確定您指的是什麼, --Wolfch (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out! I meant there were some bullets shown as "*". --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your assistance on this matter! ^__^ --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Confirmation

[edit]

謝謝您的建議, 已經修正, 謝謝--Wolfch (talk) 04:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! : ) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 04:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, I found zh:臺灣兒童青少年精神醫學會 is not be redirected to zh:台灣兒童青少年精神醫學會. How could it be? And please consider to correct it when you're in leisure! Gratitude! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 04:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Source you may want to include in the ADHD controversy article.

[edit]

謝謝提供資料, 我會思考看看要不要加入相關內容, 若要加入的話要如何加入, 謝謝--Wolfch (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

另外, "ADHD獵人與農夫理論"有找到對應的英文條目Hunter vs. farmer hypothesis--Wolfch (talk) 22:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
checkY I got it! ^__^ --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 03:48, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ref for targeted temperature management

[edit]

Is needed. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 06:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Draft:心動家族兒童青少年關懷協會 to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Wolfch (talk) 14:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I got it. : ) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First body, then lead, then infobox

[edit]

Hey, I understand the desire to just hit the infobox or the lead, but please update the body of the article with well sourced content. If - and only if - in light of everything else in the article, it belongs in the lead, please then summarize the new content in lead. The infobox is a yet higher-level summary, please think a second time about whether the new material should or should not go in the infobox. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder. There was an edit conflict therefore I didn't find your edit brief. Thanks again. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 21:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

[edit]

If there is one good reference, that is typically all that is needed. More refs in the middle of the sentence such as here[2] is not really needed. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I got it! ^__^ Have a fabulous rest of your week friend! ^_^ --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a commentary on a primary source. We should really be using reviews per WP:MEDRS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Thank you so much! It's not a summary of systematic review, however, I perceive NEJM as an excellent publisher and their primary findings have high potential to be replicated by other researches. Please feel free to let me know if there exist logical flaws among my belief. Thank you--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 07:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry @Doc James:, do you get me? My English is not good. XD --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 09:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Have added the new finding and refs.--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 05:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Ways to improve Susan Shur-Fen Gau

[edit]

Hi, I'm Gatemansgc. It's gonna be awesome, thanks for creating Susan Shur-Fen Gau!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. While this is far better than a machine translation, it still needs a copyedit in places. However this seems like a good article to have on Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Gatemansgc (talk) 21:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I gonna improve it.--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 21:46, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fire loading, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flammable materials (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National FengHsin Senior High School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 17:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:FHSH listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Talk:FHSH. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:FHSH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wolfch (talk) 09:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:KGHS listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Talk:KGHS. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:KGHS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wolfch (talk) 09:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Shur-Fen Gau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cerebrovascular disease, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyperthermia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breast milk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resistance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bias towards the north and against south".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 17:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:心理教育

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "心理教育".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Cult of Xi Jinping for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cult of Xi Jinping is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult of Xi Jinping until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

China threat theory moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, China threat theory, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The editor whose username is Z0 17:37, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note on adding unsourced content

[edit]
A cup of coffee for you!

Hey, I'm Z0. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The editor whose username is Z0 17:37, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about How's the leader formed

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether How's the leader formed should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How's the leader formed .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

The editor whose username is Z0 17:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Feefeefly for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feefeefly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feefeefly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chuan Ping requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zanhe (talk) 22:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. Zanhe (talk) 22:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Highschool original graduation songs compilation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highschool original graduation songs compilation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 22:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

16:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

09:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

19:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

17:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

16:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

16:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

16:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

22:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

21:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

15:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stigma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:People who were forced disappeared has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:People who were forced disappeared, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zanhe (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Alternative medicine, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Carl Fredrik talk 02:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

17:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

19:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

16:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Xmas

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello It's gonna be awesome, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank you! This made my day ^__^ --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Medical citation needed section

[edit]

Template:Medical citation needed section has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical judgement moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Clinical judgement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jack Frost (talk) 11:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

👌 Thanks for the reminder! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)


zh:User talk:It's gonna be awesome

Your draft article, Draft:China threat theory

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "China threat theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vasoconstriction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jtydog

[edit]

For your information Jtydog has been blocked by the Arbitration Committee.Eschoryii (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Admin right abuse

[edit]

I just got bullied by two administrators on Chinese Wikipedia. Chinese Wikipedia has sometimes been a non-rule based community because some administrators were strongly supported and elected by certain groups formed by Wikipedians who have low awareness of the importance of rules, independence, and self-consciousness and are disposed to dismiss the mistakes in favour of their ideology, probably because they're all from a region that treats laws like saying the one thing and the enforcement will do another. As a result, the law is not equally applied to everyone in Chinese Wikipedia. The said admins, more than often, act as his own group members' protector. These admins don't need to really know the rules on Wikipedia before they're highly supported.

Let's take a step back.

I was recently blocked by an administrator Techyan*, who had been highly supported by specific group of Wikipedians with similar national background, before given chance to explain.

  • From Techyan's words (Sorry, it's in Chinese.) , we know this block is definitely not made out of Procedural Justice.

However, when I tried to explain how did it go on my talk page. I was then blocked from editing or clearly disclosing further truth that can hugely reveal his friend 's apparent misjudgement and weak understanding of Wikipedia rules. I call they friends because it's a highly unusual action. Everyone on Chinese Wikipedia can understand it's a highly controversial block done by Techyan. Mys 721tx, as an admin, suddenly joined the dispute to add fuel to the fire for no any explanation is extremely unusual.

How could I get blocked just because I tried to cite an url to support my claim??

Mys 721tx's action is a very obvious abuse of his given privilege on Wikipedia as an admin. Very very shocking!

Could any admin who can read Chinese kindly help address this issue? Deeply appreciated!

I admit that I made some faults during the time I was still a beginner and an not well treated ADHD. Nevertheless, I am no longer a beginner nor severe ADHD. Those two admins should not judge based on their impression without looking into the matter. Although I can understand they're grown up in a place where application of laws is significantly depending on who the law will be applied to, it just should not be the case in democratic rule-based world.

If I am a troublemaker, I would not be the top ten medical article contributor. I swear without full confidence, I would not come here to ask for help.

--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 16:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just feel free to ask me any question:

It's time to save Chinese Wikipedia, many great candidates running for adminstrationship failed to qualify simply because they didn't have enough active supporters to vote during a short given time. However, when there came a candidate nominated by the specific group, the candidate would have no doubt win more than 50 votes to become a new administrator. This is just unfair. They should not do things like how their government does. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good night from Taiwan. This appeal is not emergency so just take your time to investigate and ask me questions. Thanks again for your time and effort, I will try my best to reply to your questions and help make the project in Chinese really reflect the beliefs and values of Wikimedia foundation that we all share. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add this, no other admin in Chinese Wikipedia dares to get involved in this matter because those admins might then ask his group members to recall the admin whose judgement is against the group's will. The group members really enjoy the unfair advantages brought by the huge number of unified opinion voters among their belonging groups! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:47, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

English admins have no power on other wikis - and other wikis have different policies and guidelines. Your best solution would be to write to info-zh@wikimedia.org (in Chinese). Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, thanks a lot. But I still hope the Wikimedia foundation can look into the new protection model invented by some PRC users. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just a plus, I have been wondering how those PRC users visit Wikipedia in spite of the dramatically growing stronger Fire Wall and strict punishment over past few months in PRC. cool --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Use VPN,proxy(zh:翻牆),request ipblock-exempt.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 07:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh, alright! That's how they come!--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 09:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree your opinion,and feeling similar to you,but I hope you can keep calming,also,you say others and don't help you[129].--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 07:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(In my understanding, you said "I agree with your opinion and can feel your feeling but I hope you to keep calm. By saying others won't help.") I appreciate your guidance and support! 🙏 --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 09:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones: The source of It's gonna be awesome's local block in Chinese Wikipedia is his/her uncivilize, inappropriate joke toward User:Wolfch. If his attack towards Techyan and Mys_721tx continues, please report back to zh:WP:VIP, thank you. Best regards, 云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 12:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence please. : ) I questioned Techyan and Mys_721tx's reliability of being administrators on Chinese Wikipedia. I should be afraid because you're one of the members! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 12:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
zh:Wikipedia:50個或以上維基人持同一立場的投票 (Decisions that have been supported by more than fifty voters at once.) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did not get what you'd like to convey through these sentences above, so do this. You describe Wolfch's opinion as "該該叫" (=the unpleasant sound coming from crows, etc.), and delete it after 19 minutes, which shows that you are intended to offend Wolfch. --云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 13:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Any reliable source supporting your claim? --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is ridiculous. why your group had to shut my chance to explain by blocking my all edit rights? Your group's question here is the perfect demonstration of abusive block. Perfect demonstration of blocking before investigation. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are you questioning me on behalf of Techyan and Mys_721tx? Who granted you the power to act like an admin to question me? By your strong tone, it's highly likely there is a real life COI in the real world between you and those controversial admins. Stop such behaviors, if everyone recruits Wikipedians to vote for an administrator in their own favour, Wikipedia would never be the same! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Real-life COI? Excuse me, the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Don't accuse others with no evidence, and don't attack to others. I have found out that communicating with you is useless, meaningless and time-wasting. Wish you a happy Spring Festival and a happy family. --云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 13:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You know, people can report potential COI when the signs are right there. Based on your irritant response, the possibility is even higher now. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You want a evidence? I give you just one evidence at the moment. : ) [See how Techyan survived three times of impeachment] --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3068962/chinas-government-starts-issuing-fines-for-vpn-usehttps://www.scmp.com/tech/policy/article/2180960/chinese-vpn-user-fined-accessing-overseas-websites-part-beijings-ongoing Didn't you know these updates? You know, your group's arrogant presence every time just make your group look more dubious. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • 算我多嘴,你找英文圈的管理員求助中維的事情,英維這邊不能幫你,甚至可能讓你全域封禁,前例不少,中文的事情請中維解決。-Zest 15:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User Photos

[edit]

Photos on your user page are beautiful. Eschoryii (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste

[edit]

This as far as I am aware is not under an open license

https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=4617417a-08df-4417-a944-dfc30de183db

Therefore we cannot copy and paste from it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:58, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, but I saw the copyright link at the bottom of the DailyMed saying Government information at NLM Web sites is in the public domain. ? --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 06:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

ScienceDirect

[edit]

This <ref name="ScienceDirect">{{cite web | title=Diltiazem| website=ScienceDirect | url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/diltiazem | access-date=2019-02-07}}</ref> is not a reference but simple a link to a search term. We should reference the PMID or ISBN rather than a search term. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also please make sure to follow WP:MEDRS Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the kind reminder. I will try to make sure all my editing regarding medicinal articles in line with WP:MEDRS standard. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind reminder! I will. Best and happy lunar new year. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 14:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Thanks for this new article. I believe the article is a copyright violation of Medline. While many areas of Medline are public domain, the copright statement of the website explicitly excludes ADAM and the encyclopaedia. They are indeed copyrighted. Therefore, the statement saying that public domain information is used is incorrect. I have raised a copyvio revision deletion and redirected to the main article about Urine for now. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 10:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Thank you for letting me know this! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 10:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Donath-Landsteiner hemolytic anemia has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advise Diannaa a beautiful girl I believe. Well... in this case, the problem was close paraphrasing that was difficult to detect in consciousness. Additionally, by Earwig's Copyvio Detector:Violation is Unlikely. The overlaps are mostly due to terminologies. Hopefully, you would understand. However, I will try to improve my skill. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 20:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hypervitaminosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neurogenic shock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extremities (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk to us about talking

[edit]

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Few comments

[edit]

1) We tend to use "people with" rather than "patient" 2) We use very few caps. 3) Best just to stick with review articles or major medication organizations per WP:MEDRS

Best :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I appreciate your suggestions. I wish you could kindly provide some diffs so I can learn more quickly. Best :) --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 04:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About "Negative impact......treated early in time." in article Shock_(circulatory)

[edit]

Hi,

In the "cause" section of arttcle Shock_(circulatory), there is "Negative impact by shock is reversible if it's recognized and treated early in time." It is about the result of shock, not about the cause of shock. I think it would be better in "management" section instead of the "cause". Think --Wolfch (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, agree. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to do such change but failed. (because of edit conflict). I will do that again.--Wolfch (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, is not in English and serves no purpose in its current form on the Ennglish Wikipedia. List of hospitals by yearly earnings in Taiwan, does not have any sources or citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh!! Thanks for the reminder! I originally thought it was put under my namespace and pending translation. I appreciate your kind reminder. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 08:41, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Secondary cold agglutinin syndrome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326213/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:10, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vasodilatory shock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/cardiogenic-shock. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:CASSIOPEIA the source you mention is the NIH which is PD? Not a copyright concern. I just improved the tagging. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doc James Ok. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

[edit]

Remember that refs are to go immediately after the punctuation. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I get it. Thanks. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 04:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Intoxication shock

[edit]

Hello. Please can you help to fix the link from template {{Shock types}} to disambiguation page Intoxication? My first guess was Alcohol intoxication but I may be wrong as shock isn't mentioned in that article. Thanks, Certes (talk) 20:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

19:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

18:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Ref

[edit]

Were does this ref discuss hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

High blood pressure[1]

Hypertensive cardiomyopathy is classified separately. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:58, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc James: Enlarged heart was redirected to cardiomegaly, a synonym of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 12:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article on Cardiomegaly which lists a few types of which hypertrophic is just one :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "High Blood Pressure (Hypertension)". Texas Heart Institute (Tertiary source). Retrieved 2019-03-29. Enlarged heart. High blood pressure increases the amount of work for your heart. Like any heavily exercised muscle in your body, your heart grows bigger (enlarges) to handle the extra workload. The bigger your heart is, the more it demands oxygen-rich blood but the less able it is to maintain proper blood flow. As a result, you feel weak and tired and are not able to exercise or perform physical activities. Without treatment, your heart failure will only get worse.

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019: English language

[edit]

Hello, Mr. Awsome: I notice that in your recent edits to Piracetam, you show a difficulty with idiomatic English. I will have to re-edit that article to repair your inability in English. Use of a dictionary and extra caution are advised to make useful edits.--2601:648:8200:7C9A:9DE3:2A9D:2903:1BC5 (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads up!! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 02:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki/mining listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wiki/mining. Since you had some involvement with the Wiki/mining redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. feminist (talk) 08:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hemolytic anemia into Hemolysis. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Thanks for letting me know it. I will now correct it and will try to remember this rule in the future when I copy a paragraph-sized content from other articles. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:39, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Piracetam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the information. I originally thought medical leaflet in the UK is attributed to the public domain. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 03:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires attribution

[edit]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Hemolysis you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see. Thanks for the guidance! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 13:46, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Posicor

[edit]

May I ask you a few questions about the drug Posicor?

Thanks P L Moore jodelf9@windstream.net

Sorry, I think I am neither an expert nor having time. But I wish you good luck! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 06:59, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Small primary source

[edit]

We should really try to be using high quality and recent secondary sources.

This is a small old primary source.[174]

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for educating. My original idea was that I used it there for enriching the number of citations that would, in turn, reinforce the certainty of the assertion on the article. And I thought that paper published by the pediatric association has been included in many systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Thirdly, it's a paper from an excellent expert. Thanks again for teaching. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 11:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

References

[edit]
Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

  1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
  2. Then click on "templates",
  3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
  4. If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:18, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know days are busy for everyone. Just wanna say if you worry about China's growing aggressive actions, if you care of democracy, if you care of Taiwan, the first state in Asia legalizing same-sex marriage, you may want to pay a little attention to the article User:It's gonna be awesome/Chinese Communist Party has invaded Chinese Wikipedia. Taiwan is at the front of China's aggressive intention to take over the world. Please bless Taiwan. Thank you. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Humbleblue (talk) 10:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This action is cross-wiki abuse,please remember WP:COOL,because zh.wiki request indef you[183].--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 10:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019 block

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

It's gonna be awesome (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

  1. Evidence required. Furthermore, CCP has invaded ZH Wiki is well-sourced by 50 physical reliable sources and even more internal links. Thus, you have to point out where is the personal attack you referred to. #According to the contribution report, I've created 321 pages. And you just picked Draft:China threat theory, Cult of Xi Jinping, Chuan Ping, Category:Political prisoner in China, Category:People who were forced disappeared and accuse me of endless soapboxing? ##If Draft:China threat theory, Cult of Xi Jinping, Chuan Ping, Category:Political prisoner in China, Category:People who were forced disappeared are simply soaping, they should have undergone speedy deletion rather than AfD or CfD. It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

If you have issues with another language Wikipedia, please do not bring them here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Boing! said Zebedee: I wrote it in progress under my namespace and didn't ask English Wikipedia to solve the problem. Rather, I wrote it under my namespace as part of my preparation to submit it to the Foundation given MediaWiki's citation friendly user interface. Maybe there's a misunderstanding. An indefinite block should not be the first measure. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 16:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Write it somewhere else then - you are not allowed to host such material in your user space here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Boing! said Zebedee: Thanks for your hint. I am currently reading Wikipedia:User_pages. If I have any question about Wikipedia:User_pages, I would ask you because I would like to gain a greater understanding of Wikipedia via this chance. Thanks for your time and patience. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 16:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keeping in mind IGBA has a few thousands edits here, I am not sure if this is fair to ban him indef over one count of transgression. Viztor (talk) 16:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest an unblock request that promises not to post any similar material here on the English Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, people. But before I can make the promise, I think I need to finish the course of figuring out the scope of "similar material" by reading through related policies and guidelines. It will take some time probably a few days. All in all, I appreciate all the feedback you guys gave that would motivate me a lot to become a better person to others. Thanks! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest an unblock request should include some retraction of the user's explicit statements that certain zhwiki admins are backed by the CCP, which included a list of requests for deadminship (it's a thing on zhwiki) and compilation of many of the administrators' personal details, and assurances that that won't be repeated. See WP:POLEMIC. Also, we don't have a speedy criterion for blatant advocacy; the fact those pages were not speedy deleted means nothing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:38, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback. I promise to find time tomorrow to carefully learn & absorb knowledge from your messages. I am about to sleep. I am grateful for your time and education. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree - an assurance would need to be specific in the ways you suggest. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Thanks for your enlightening comments. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Boing! said Zebedee and Ivanvector:, I would like to promise that I will try my best to abide by WP:POLEMIC in the future. Also, I would like to apologize for any inconvenience this may cause to Wikipedia and the mentioned admins in Chinese Wikipedia. What I learned from this incident is that I shouldn't have steadfastly appointed my fingers at some people when the evidence was not 100% indicative. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 16:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

It's gonna be awesome (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

  1. I would like to promise that I will try my best to abide by WP:POLEMIC in the future.
  2. I would like to apologize for any inconvenience this may cause to Wikipedia and the mentioned admins in Chinese Wikipedia.
  3. What I learned from this incident is that I shouldn't have steadfastly appointed my fingers at some people when the evidence was not 100% suggestive of what it seemed to me and some others in addition to Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks#Avoiding_personal_attacks:As a matter of polite and effective discourse...Editors should be civil and adhere to good etiquette when describing disagreements, which I agree but sometimes find it difficult to thoroughly follow as it doesn't have a standard and over-sticking to which may make me leave people with the impression of being hypocritical. But even so, I will keep learning to talk things politely and non-hypocritically.
  4. I would like to clarify that the sources for the article were available in public such as their User pages, their interviews with news media, etc. I have been committed to Wikipedia's policy by securely/firmly/steadfastly/greatly [note 1] respecting people's private info and always will be.
  5. Finally, I would like to thank the involved admins, Wikipedians, and, lastly, the Wikipedia community for your kind understandings and helping me grow.

--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

  • @Ivanvector:: since Category:Requests_for_unblock stating that "Per the blocking policy and block appeals guidelines, unless exceptional or expedient circumstances apply, administrators should not unblock a user without prior discussion with the blocking admin", would you mind to give some suggestion to my unblock request? Thank you. I would like to further explain that my "I would like to promise that I will try my best to abide by WP:POLEMIC in the future." is based on my belief that nothing in the world is 100% or 0 %. It doesn't mean I refused to change. Rather it means that I promised that the probability for such behavior to happen would be extremely low. I think my unblock request meets your prior demand I'd suggest an unblock request should include some retraction of the user's explicit statements that certain zhwiki admins are backed by the CCP, which included a list of requests for deadminship (it's a thing on zhwiki) and compilation of many of the administrators' personal details, and assurances that that won't be repeated. See WP:POLEMIC. People should be given chance to learn. No one in the world is perfect. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a promising step, I think, but I think you also need to address the pages you created with respect to WP:NOTADVOCACY. Specifically: that Wikipedia is not to be used to promote your political opinions or to compile original research, including synthesizing unrelated sources to suggest a conclusion that is not given by those sources. We tolerate some criticism of Wikipedia when done constructively and in good faith (see for example User:Ritchie333/SPI considered harmful, User:W. Frank/Accusations of collaboration: 3RR hurts Wikipedia, User:Martinp23/ArbCom isn't God), but we will not tolerate attacks on individuals. If you're planning to publish such criticism, I suggest you tread very carefully, or consider doing so on your own website and not linking to it from here.
Furthermore, although this block was in my own capacity as administrator, it arose from a community discussion, and I think it should therefore be subject to community review. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector: As an uninvolved user in the dispute, I do have faith in this editor. As seen in his editing record on both zh and en wiki, he is here to contribute. What he did is extremely inapproriate, however, I do beleive it is an honest mistake as he claimed, he might believed he is doing whatever he can to make wikipedia better, though not through calm and well-reasoned ways. On the other note, he does listen to what the community said, and instead of request an unblock immediately, he replied to the above comment and said he decided to learn more about the policy, and made the request a week later, so I believe that he honestly means what he said and he did study about the policy. So instead of punishing a long time contributor who made a mistake, why don't we just WP:ROPE Viztor (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector: Specifically: that Wikipedia is not to be used to promote your political opinions or to compile original research, including synthesizing unrelated sources to suggest a conclusion that is not given by those sources. We tolerate some criticism of Wikipedia when done constructively and in good faith (see for example User:Ritchie333/SPI considered harmful, User:W. Frank/Accusations of collaboration: 3RR hurts Wikipedia, User:Martinp23/ArbCom isn't God), but we will not tolerate attacks on individuals. If you're planning to publish such criticism, I suggest you tread very carefully, or consider doing so on your own website and not linking to it from here. Yes, I understand and will try my best to abide by what you suggested. Thanks for teaching. Regards. @Viztor: Thank you for your warm support! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 08:50, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming good faith here that you've understood what I wrote and why you were blocked, and noting that Viztor has kindly vouched for you. I would like you to have a quick look at WP:ROPE, but tl;dr: if you are to find yourself in this spot again, it's not likely you will be unblocked. Please ask for help or advice if you need it, and best wishes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear, Sir/Madam. Thank you very much for your suggestion. I would ask for help or advice before I am about to write something regarding/targeting other Wikipedian. I promise the recurrence of such things will be very low but I can't guarantee a zero recurrence ever after since I am still impulsive sometimes, a characteristic I was born with by nature, in addition to the fact that the cut-off of personal attack is blurry. Anyway, what is certain is that I gonna keep making progress to be a better person to others.[1] All the best! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 15:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "30 Ways to Be a Nicer Person". Skilled at Life. Disclaimer: I, as It's gonna be awesome, partly agree with some written in this article. 2013-09-30. Retrieved 2019-06-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: others (link)

References

  1. ^ wording adjusted since I am not a native EN speaker and have no idea which word is more suitable and fit.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia

[edit]

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:25, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about BookFi

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, BookFi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BookFi .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:36, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

How do you change the colour and style of your username and talk page links?

[edit]

I'd like to change mine. Could you tell me how to do it please? :) Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomSmithNP (talkcontribs) 11:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the source code of my signature can be seen in the source code editing mode. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬

Your draft article, Draft:Clinical judgement

[edit]

Hello, It's gonna be awesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clinical judgement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 12:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft for the unblock process

[edit]

Rule-based

[edit]
  1. Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks:
    1. I understand that I was blocked because I used two accounts that were not publicly linked nor prior notified any Wikipedian with check user right, to contribute the same article on Wikipedia even though I didn't use them to engage in any edit war.
    2. I failed to perform a clean start even though my starting point for using two invisible accounts was not due to the avoidance of scrutiny.
    3. I wrongly regarded Doc James' removal of certain assertion supported by tertiary sources as blatant vandalism. As a result, I dismissed the rule of 3RR. In the future, I will try my best (I don't make 100% promise.) to remember that blatant vandalism is defined as:
      1. Edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.
    4. I will try my best to keep the following two key points in mind.
      1. Considerable leeway is given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a featured article while it appears on the main page.
      2. If you are claiming an exemption, make sure there is a clearly visible edit summary or separate section of the talk page that explains the exemption. When in doubt, do not revert. Instead, engage in dispute resolution and, in particular, ask for help at relevant noticeboards such as the Edit war and 3RR noticeboard.
  2. Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Inappropriate_uses_of_alternative_accounts:
    1. Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people.
    2. Misusing a clean start by switching accounts or concealing a clean start in a way that avoids scrutiny is considered a breach of this policy; see Wikipedia:Clean start.
  3. Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses:
    1. Clean start under a new name: A clean start is when a user stops using an old account in order to start afresh with a new account, usually due to past mistakes or to avoid harassment. A clean start is permitted only if there are no active bans, blocks, or sanctions in place against the old account. Do not use your new account to return to topic areas, disputes, editing patterns, or behaviors previously identified as problematic, and you should be careful not to do anything that looks like an attempt to evade scrutiny. A clean start requires that you no longer use your old account(s), which should note on their user pages that they are inactive—for example, with the {{retired}} tag—to prevent the switch being seen as an attempt to sock puppet.
  4. Wikipedia:Edit_warring#The_three-revert_rule:Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption.

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See below for exemptions.

  1. Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Alternative_account_notification:Editors who have multiple accounts for privacy reasons should consider notifying a checkuser or members of the arbitration committee if they believe editing will attract scrutiny. Editors who heavily edit controversial material, those who maintain single purpose accounts, as well as editors considering becoming an administrator are among the groups of editors who attract scrutiny even if their editing behavior itself is not problematic or only marginally so. Concerned editors may wish to email the arbitration committee or any individual with checkuser rights. Editors who have abandoned an account and are editing under a new identity are required to comply with the clean start policy.

Mind's voice

[edit]

I originally didn't plan to state that I have developmental delay in this account. But after several days of peaceful thinking, I feel the need of having an alternative account has now reduced pretty much. I should not have felt it strange to disclose on English Wikipedia that I am living with pervasive developmental disorder/autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, currently on cholinesterase inhibitor, NMDA receptor antagonist along with other meds for ADHD on the ground of fighting against the stigama. (Yes, I now believe I should treat Wikipedia as an ideal world holding sacred values that will lead the real world to move forward better together. I should not have felt it shamed/embrassing to admit I've disability here in Wikipedia regardless of how the reality works on its way.) And I would like to apologize to User:Doc James for the incompetence that reminded me of the room of the improvement in the future. (Also, reminded me of the need of cholinesterase inhibitor and NMDA receptor antagonist in addition to other personal mental practices in combination with FDA-approved meds for ADHD. ) I want to thank User:Yamla along with other admins who lent me the warm helping hands and helped me grow through kind guidance. The determination and desire of propagating the novel treatment reviewed by the specialists overwhelmed my past-self and led to the rebound of ASD's characteristics such as cognitive rigidity and emotional dysfunction from the executive functions.

--It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to spend time needlessly citing policy before making an unblock request, I'm willing to give you some latitude, but this is not the place for a dissertation on autism or ADHD. I've removed the references from the above, and I strongly suggest that you focus on something else as your mental problems are irrelevant to any unblock request or your edits at Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! Thank you for the suggestion. I originally wanted to let people know my thoughts behind my moves as the policies on Wikipedia might be cold to some people. --18:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know how you think, which would, in turn, enrich my memory repository that will guide my action in the future and help me make progress on socialization! --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formal application

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

It's gonna be awesome (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been more than one month since the day I was blocked and started reading the policies pertaining to my block. Now, I think I have a better sense of correctly contributing to Wikipedia. I saw the error of my prior ways. I am going to try my best to not to repeat the same mistake from now onwards. Thanks for the guidance. It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 16:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to explain, in your own words, what exactly the error was and how your future conduct will change. Vaguely worded assurances like the ones above do not show that you actually understand the problem. Huon (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft for the formal unblock request

[edit]

Second formal request/proposal

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

It's gonna be awesome (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I adopted advice suggested from Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks:

  1. I understand that I was blocked because I used two accounts that were not publicly linked nor prior notified any Wikipedian with check user right, to contribute the same article on Wikipedia even though I didn't use them to engage in any edit war.
  2. I failed to perform a clean start even though my starting point for using two invisible accounts was not due to the avoidance of scrutiny.

In the future, I will try my best (I don't make 100% promise.) using alternative accounts only if I have prior notified any Wikipedian with check user right, got them publicly linked, or warranted not to contribute the same article on Wikipedia in a short period of time (I personally set the limit as roughly three months [a]) as I presently don't know how much should I trust those admins.


  • I wrongly regarded Doc James' removal of certain assertion supported by tertiary sources such as medical textbook as blatant vandalism. As a result, I dismissed the rule of 3RR.

From now onwards, I will try my best [b] to remember that blatant vandalism is defined as:

  1. Edits that any well-intentioned user would agree to constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.
as well as the two key exceptions:
  1. Considerable leeway is given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a featured article while it appears on the main page.
  2. If you are claiming an exemption, make sure there is a clearly visible edit summary or separate section of the talk page that explains the exemption. When in doubt, do not revert. Instead, engage in dispute resolution and, in particular, ask for help at relevant noticeboards such as the Edit war and 3RR noticeboard.

After a long time of calming, I think I understand the blocking administrator's concern. I have learned/benefited abundantly from Wikimedia's projects. Thanks. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:16, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully yours.It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 17:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ It doesn't seem to specify the period of time in § contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts. Ideally, I should assume that means infinite but then I feel it can be not realistic/practical in cases of the clean start or just fixing some typos and so on.
  2. ^ I cannot be a superman just overnight. I don't intend to be a superman actually. I mean I am willing to learn but I know I am not genius at all. It takes time for me to learn everything. I am a slow learner I am not ashamed to admit. Also, it takes me a really long time to connect with people and, thus, to accurately predict what might people think.

Decline reason:

You created a sockpuppet that had to be globally locked for cross-wiki abuse. I think it's best if you took some time away from Wikipedia and appealed 6 months after the original block. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another admin is going to review this request. I currently do not have any comments. Huon (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @TonyBallioni: I didn't use the alternative account to contribute Wikipedia for the wrong purpose in a way that is harmful or morally wrong. I believe I used my alternative accounts to correct some typoes, improve references, write articles, learn, or study with Wikipedia aside without giving some people the misleading impression that I was in leisure when I was actually not and directly knowing my medical history that I had pervasive developmental disorders and ADHD. As a matter of fact that, I didn't arrange two accounts to double my voice against any side. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 07:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I'm not going to tell you what you want. As I pointed out over at User talk:Exert yourself, this was not a legitimate use of a clean start. And furthermore, you ran into substantial problems with that other account. It was not a case of simply correcting some typoes, etc., it was bad enough for you to get that account globally locked. Look, you have a path forward; WP:SO in six months. But unblock requests like you've been making here won't be enough in six months. Right now, you are saying your actions weren't that bad. They were that bad. --Yamla (talk) 10:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla: Hi, thanks so much for the quick response. May I inquire about what the substantial problem did you refer to? Please just feel free to let me know. Don't worry, I am not mentally weak. Thank you! -It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 18:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It was a massive amount of work cleaning up the issues created by User:Exert yourself. You were attempting to use sources to say stuff that they did not really say. And the textbook in question was not a major medical textbook so thus not really a WP:MEDRS.[220] It was discussing research not medical uses.
We have this discussion here [221]. You did not really take the feedback provided by multiple experienced editors. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: Thanks for letting me know your thoughts. For your first focus, I would say I had tried to convert a list of information that met with the approvals from a broad of specialists into paragraphs, which is suggested by the WP:MOS. For your second focus, I would say that we're not here to judge a source published by an independent publisher composed of medical specialists. I think unless Wikipedia blacklisted that medical textbook or is very explicit about what are major medical textbooks, we are supposed to respect the source, which is suggested by WP:OR. Admin Yamla also pointed out that my error was 3RR as opposed to making original researches. However, I understand your concern about hosting some statements of medical efficacies supported by the medical textbook that was not secondary to the double blind randomized trials can mislead our readers. Hence, I think we can follow the instructions provided by the WP:NPOV to attribute such stuffs to the referenced medical textbook. Actually, there are many review researches available on PubMed stand for the use of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in treating social deficit commonly seen in people with ASD. Additionally, I am not certain about how to qualify to be a so-called experienced editor. But I have engaged in writing medical articles on Wikipedia for many years. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!Talk♬ 19:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We judge sources all the time. That is actually one of the primary things we do. The use of sources is also not black and white. One source may be good enough to support one thing but not another. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2019 statistis of position vacancies of regions by number in Taiwan

[edit]

Template:2019 statistis of position vacancies of regions by number in Taiwan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wolfch (talk) 16:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chart of position vacancies of regions in Taiwan by number/January

[edit]

Template:Chart of position vacancies of regions in Taiwan by number/January has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wolfch (talk) 16:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

[edit]

This user has engaged in regular block evasion. They are arguably now banned under WP:3X (three instances of checkuser-verified block evasion after their indefinite block). This is not entirely clear, though. However, one more instance will be clear and will lead to an indefinite ban. All contributions from the sockpuppet accounts should be reverted on sight. --Yamla (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That discussion is archived at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive317#It's gonna be awesome banned; repeated block evasion--Wolfch (talk) 05:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Fengshan Senior High Schoo" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fengshan Senior High Schoo. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#Fengshan Senior High Schoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to the CYP2C9 page that you did last year. The edits that I did since 22 June 2020‎ in the CYP2C9 page, mostly on CYP2C9#Pharmacogenomics and CYP2C9#CYP2C9 Ligands. -- Maxim Masiutin (talk) 17:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Planning constructions in Taiwan, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Presynaptic synapse

[edit]

Template:Presynaptic synapse has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]