Jump to content

User talk:Jarry1250/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10←Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17→Archive 20

Please comment on Template talk:Extant organization

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Extant organization. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Indian events

Hello, in case you need illustrations we have a couple categories at Commons: commons:Category:GNUnify_2013 and commons:Category:Open_Source_Language_Summit_Pune_2013. --Nemo 15:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

GOCE Copyedit of Long March (Pakistan)


The Signpost: 18 February 2013

Choosing Wisely

Thanks for commenting. I replied to you on that article's talk page. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Transclusion count tool

Hi, Jarry; please see this edit --Redrose64 (talk) 18:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Lua

Hey Harry, could you take a look at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions#Lua deployment? Thanks :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Social market economy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Social market economy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

  1. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
  2. London Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
  3. New South Wales Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Alaska Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by British Empire The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Oxford Meetup 4

I'm sorry that you couldn't attend the third Oxford Meetup: we had a good turnout - 10 people. We hope to keep this as a regular event, every two months, on the first Sunday of the month (in order not to clash with London [second Sunday]). A page has been created about the fourth Oxford Meetup; please sign up if you think that you are able to attend - if the date or venue are unsuitable, please comment at its discussion page.

Please spread the word to anybody else who you think might be interested. The next UK meetup is London, 10 March 2013. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Tech report

Hey buddy, I hope you're feeling better...! Are you going to be able to write a tech report this week? :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 12:51, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fascism

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fascism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear Jarry, are you a robot? And who has edited the Scunthorpe page since I did?

Dear Jarry, I do seem to remember some involvement with you (or someone of your name) in the past - but I am now wondering whether you are OK or whether you are a robot...??? I wrote a letter via e-mail to Wikipedia but received no reply (that was about 6 months? ago)...Also, I just made a change to the Scunthorpe page - and my change was reversed - but it no longer seems to say by who/m/ and there seems to be no warning/admonishment/ discussion about the matter...???

Best wishes,


Sarah-Jane MackenzieJaneyjo (talk) 21:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I assure you that Jarry1250 wasn't a robot last time I saw them. Anyway, I assume that you are referring to this edit: it shows who did it and why; I fully agree with the revert, since commentary like that belongs on the article's talk page, which in this case is Talk:Scunthorpe. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

Please comment on Talk:Great Commission church movement

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Great Commission church movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

CIDR range tool

I have just queried the tool for the ip range 76.226.112.0/20, but it seems to be returning far too many results. For instance 76.226.151.26 is included, which unless I have made a schoolboy arithmetic error, is not in the specified range. Error message at the bottom of the list reads;

Warning: [MessagesFunctions::parse] Problems when parsing the message. For Information see below!.
Fatal error: [MessagesFunctions::plural] Invalid number argument to in /home/project/i/n/t/intuition/externals/TsIntuition/language/MessagesFunctions.php on line 119.

Thanks for looking. SpinningSpark 14:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

Please comment on Talk:Karl Marx

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Karl Marx. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate London Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's New South Wales Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr (Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare (Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus (Alaska Keilana (submissions) and New South Wales Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John (Indiana Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

Bot off?

Not sure if you know/anything can be done, but, for whatever reason, the bot didn't run for a few days. Not the end of the world, but I thought you may want to know. J Milburn (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Please comment on Talk:PIGS (economics)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PIGS (economics). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
For your contributions to bring Henry VIII of England to Good Article status. Thanks for improving this high-importance article--keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

Please comment on Talk:Silk Road (marketplace)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Silk Road (marketplace). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your contributions to Operation Granby

Good Afternoon

On 18 September 2010 you added information regarding the Royal Air Force's role in Operation Granby.

Do you still own the reference you used I ask because a anonymous editor has added information and used a reference tag from your reference and I do not know if the newly added information is from the reference you added.

Their addition is here

The reference you added is <ref>{{cite book |title=Britain's Gulf War: Operation Granby |chapter=The Royal Air Force |author=Air Vice-Marshall R.A. Mason|pages=35–43|date=1991 |publisher=Harrington Kilbride |location=London}}</ref>

I personally suspect they just copied the reference tag onto there added information but I wanted to make sure

Thank You. Gavbadger (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Echo

Can you respond to my comment here, please? Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

Talkback

Hello, Jarry1250. You have new messages at WT:SIGNPOST.
Message added 13:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 13:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

In case it's not watchlisted

There's an issue here. I've not looked into the details as it's late, but it's possible your bot doesn't pick up portals so well? J Milburn (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Problems

Hello Jarry! I do have a problem with your tool. I tried a translation with Firefox, IE and Opera and everytime at the end there were these comments:

"Error
There was an error uploading. Hit your browser's back button to retry."
"Error
An unexpected error occurred. Hit your browser's back button to retry."
In the last one there was this additional summary: "Warning: file_get_contents(/tmp/svgt_fin_K0airR): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/jarry/public_html/svgtranslate/svgtranslate.php on line 272 Warning: rmdir(/tmp/svgt_RHaWqD-dir): File exists in /home/jarry/public_html/svgtranslate/svgtranslate.php on line 698"


After going back und retrying no other result! I tried different files, always the same problem! Thanx for your help! Regards --JCS (talk) 12:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and second place Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 16:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Bot and portals

Sorry to bug you, but the bot definitely seems to be having a problem with the portals. I've stuck the appropriate templates on the submissions page, but the bot [ain't happy]. Could you possibly look into this? Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikicup tool

In case you haven't noticed, the "not updated live" part of your Wikicup tool hasn't been updated in quite a while. Its not very important, obviously, but it might be interesting to see the round 2 final stats. While on the subject, I noticed a bug. For some reason, Spencer was credited for 8 round 1 ITNs but actually had 4. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

WikiCup multipliers

Hi there- first of all, I'm guessing you've got a lot going on outside of Wikipedia right now; I assume you're in exam period. As such, don't worry about the WikiCup stuff if you've got more important things to be doing. That said- I'm not sure if this is because of WikiData, but the bot seems to catch the odd multiplier completely wrong- see the history of Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2013/Submissions/The C of E. The user in question sometimes creates articles on numerous other Wikipedias (there's nothing necessarily wrong with that, of course), and it's partly because of this possibility that points are awarded based on how many Wikipedias the article appeared on at the start of the year. I'm not sure if much can be done about this, but I thought you'd like to know. J Milburn (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sazerac Company

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sazerac Company. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

WMUK's Lua on Wikimedia event

Hi, this is just a reminder that you have previously signed up for the Lua on Wikimedia event taking place at Wikimedia UK office this Sunday. The plan is to start at 10am, but I should be around to let you in from 9-ish. See you then! -- Katie Chan (WMUK) (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

UK Wikimedian of the Year 2013/Nominations

The Wikimedia UK AGM will be held in June, and nominations for the UK Wikimedian of the Year are currently open. If there is someone who you feel has made an important contribution to the UK Wikimedia movement in the last year please go ahead and nominate them here by 09:00 (BST) on Monday 20th May at the latest. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Jarry1250. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 21:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

Please comment on User talk:Mcnabber091

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Mcnabber091. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

{Translate}

Hello Jarry,

I just notice the commons SVG translate tool is bugging. Just to report this issue ! Yug (talk) 10:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Signpost

1 week until the next Signpost? :) ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 09:57, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Oxford Meetup 5

Hi, I'm concerned about the low level of support for the fifth Oxford Meetup. Are you unable to attend, or is it that you haven't seen the geonotice? --Redrose64 (talk) 12:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

Query that I would like answered to my yahoo email address

I would like the number for a business which is: SlimDown247, Fulfilment Center, 22100 E. 26th Ave. #100, Aurora, CO 80019 -3605 That IS the way they spell their Center Thank you. My user name is Baldchiropractors. My email address is: karannorahope@yahoo.comBaldchiropractors (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Oxford Meetup 6

Thank you for attending the fifth Oxford Meetup, and it was a pleasure meeting you. I intended to send this message on Monday, but I've been a bit busy, sorry.

Several of us would like to continue with the monthly plan, since trying to make a two-monthly cycle fit into the University terms doesn't work very well. A page has been created about the sixth Oxford Meetup; please sign up if you think that you are able to attend - if the date or venue are unsuitable, please comment at its discussion page.

Please spread the word to anybody else who you think might be interested. The next UK meetups are at: London, 16 June; Manchester, 22 June; and Coventry, 7 July. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

SVG Translate

Hello, your tool seems to have a problem. It displays the message:

"Unfortunately it appears that the tool has some serious problems, which I will hopefully try to address soon. Sorry for any inconvenience. Notice: Undefined variable: trans in /home/jarry/public_html/svgtranslate/index.php on line 43 Fatal error: Call to a member function get_footer_text() on a non-object in /home/jarry/public_html/svgtranslate/index.php on line 43"

Ayack (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I don't think it's a problem with Jarry's tool per se, but a general symptom of the problems that toolserver has had for several months - these are intermittent, but affect everything hosted there. There's been plenty at WP:VPT about it. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
It's a combination of both. Unfortunately I'm not going to be able to fix the tool for a while, so rather than let editors waste time trying it (only for it to break on step #5 of 6 or whatever) I've disabled the tool in the interim (Ayack). - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 10:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013 Tech Comm

What price victory (in the pub quiz)? The Tech Committee meeting obviously! I'm re-scheduling for an evening next week - if you can drop in your availability on this doodle before Friday that would be great :D Katherine Bavage (WMUK) (talk) 09:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

WLM competition

Thanks so much for volunteering at Commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in the United Kingdom/People. Will be in contact with some details soon. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Oxford Meetup 6

Hi, it was pointed out to me that 7 July 2013 collides with Coventry 8, who have a prior claim to the date. Since nobody has (yet) claimed 14 July for any UK meetups, I have decided that Oxford 6 should be held on 14 July 2013, and not 7 July as previously advertised. In this way, those who wish to attend both may do so. I hope the revised Oxford date is convenient for you; and if it isn't, why not give Coventry a try? --Redrose64 (talk) 15:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Precious again

complex person
Thank you for presenting a complex person in history like Vidkun Quisling, voicing well both the praise of his supporters ("a conscientious administrator of the highest order, knowledgeable and with an eye for detail. ... balanced and gentle to a fault, a leader who cared deeply about his people and maintained high moral standards throughout") and the criticism of his opponents ("unstable and undisciplined, abrupt, even threatening"), continuing "Quite possibly he was both", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 156th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Jarry1250. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

. Thank you, VítoR™  • (D) 18:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikiminiatlas and Scribunto

Hi Jarry1250,

I saw your name in connection with the Scribunto extension and wikiminiatlas. I want to add geographic coordinates to my wiki page so that it shows geo-coordinates like the top right corner of this wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Wall_Centre but I want my locations to be specific locations from my wiki page not from Wikipedia, is this possible? My wiki site is not connected to wikipedia.

I added the wikiminiatlas code from (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Wikiminiatlas.js) and pasted it into my MediaWiki:Common.js page. I then enabled js by using $wgUseSiteJs = true; and then tried this coordinate on one of our wiki page, { { #coordinates:40.744924|-74.006943 } } but I don't see a globe.


Do I need to enable Scribunto extension along with the wikiminiatlas .js file before this will work?

I did a lot of online searches and asked people on mw support and also mediawiki irc chat but I'm not

getting any good answers and I hope you can help. Thanks for your help.

Peter in Canada. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Backto1992 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

To use the {{#coordinates:}} parser function, you need to have mw:Extension:GeoData installed. But that parser function doesn't display any coordinates - it saves them to a database so that they may be queried via the API.
In a Wikipedia page, the coordinates are normally specified using the {{coord}} template. That template has two components - one is {{#coordinates:}}, the other is {{#invoke:Coordinates|coord}} which performs the actual display of the coordinates using Module:Coordinates, which being a Module, does require Scribunto. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

Tweak to LivingBot

Hi. Rather than having LivingBot specify "Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe", please use "Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe" instead. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Signpost barnstar

The Signpost Barnstar
Thanks for your service at the Signpost, putting many hours of your life into writing the Tech report. We will miss you and hope you come back when you have time again. Good luck with your IRL work! --Pine✉, ΛΧΣ21, Serendipodous, and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Seconded. Hard to replace someone with your skill-set. And you write so well! Tony (talk) 07:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Thirded! Andreas JN466 09:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to the Signpost. Hope that whatever it is you choose to do next will be rewarding for you. Neotarf (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Fifthed. Thanks for your work! Go Phightins! 12:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Sixthed! ·addshore· talk to me! 12:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Seventhed! Keilana|Parlez ici 15:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Eighted! NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati's alternate account) 15:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Uh. Ninthed, no matter how much these bastardized words disgust me. ;-) Thanks, Jarry—you've been a great help and resource that I could count on whenever I needed. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:52, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks all, really appreciate it. Hope to be back editing soon! - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 21:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Number ten, here. Best wishes on your future endeavors. –Mabeenot (talk) 01:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Publishers Clearing House

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Publishers Clearing House. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

Findings

Would you be willing to consider moving User:Jarry1250/Findings to WP space, such as to Wikipedia:Disambiguation term findings. We do not normally link to user space, such as from Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Format. Or move all four of them to WP:Disambiguation analysis /Introduction /Method /Findings /Tabulated data Thanks. Apteva (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello thar

 Hello Jarry1250, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 01:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

WLM in the UK

Hi Harry, I expect you will have seen my note to the WLM-UK 2013 mailing list suggesting a telephone call sometime soon to discuss progress and ongoing priorities. Are you available one evening next week? MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Murray Rothbard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost

Hi. LivingBot keeps adding interwiki links that Addbot keeps removing. --Meno25 (talk) 13:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Tech meetups

Just letting you know that I posted at wmuk:Talk:Towards a five year plan 2013-18. Yaris678 (talk) 12:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:BP

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Mail

You have mail --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

SVG translation tool down?

Hello, I was trying to use your SVG translation tool but I get this error:

Unfortunately it appears that the tool has some serious problems, which I will hopefully try to address soon. Sorry for any inconvenience. Notice: Undefined variable: trans in /home/jarry/public_html/svgtranslate/index.php on line 43 Fatal error: Call to a member function get_footer_text() on a non-object in /home/jarry/public_html/svgtranslate/index.php on line 43

Could it be it is down? Thank you!--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I am eagerly waiting to see the tool is back. All the best ! Singhalawap (talk) 12:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Grammarly

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Grammarly. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

Heraldry and Vexillology project

Greetings! I have requested commentary from members of the heraldry and vexillology project at WT:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology#Current direction of the HV project. Please comment there. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (☎ Diskuss | ✍ Beiträge) 18:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Canada Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, London Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Poland Piotrus (submissions), Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Please comment on Talk:Welspun Energy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Welspun Energy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

Please comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

Scotland

Thanks for the script Harry, I think it should help speed things up. As you saw for yourself at Falkirk it works. Testing it on North Ayrshire it seems that where there are no pre-existing notes the script switches the column with HB number. Not a disaster (and can be fixed by hand), but can that be fixed? List of Category A listed buildings in North Lanarkshire doesn't want to play ball, but at least it's a short list so wouldn't take long to sort by hand, but if the same problem occurs with other lists we may have to try to fix it. Nev1 (talk) 12:24, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Actually, simply using 'find and replace' in Word does the trick. Nev1 (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Coordinates

Hi, do not know what you are trying to do by this edit but selecting at random entries it moves the co-ordinates to the north-west of where they should be. Previously the arrow landed exactly on the item in question when you click through to streetmap, taking as an example Roos Church. Keith D (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

(Again) about SVG Check on Toolserver

Hi. I'm sorry to trouble you once more about your SVG Check on Toolserver. While it's great to preview the SVG image before uploading to Wikimedia, the font set and letter/word spacing are still different than Wikimedia's RSVG. This causes lot of guessing of spacing between text and other objects. Is it possible to make the text rendering by your SVG Check more consistent with Wikimedia and actually use Wikimedia's font set to render the text directly? Thank you. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 03:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Henry VIII of England (estimated annual readership: 4,480,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Henry VIII of England to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it!

Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

  1. Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
  2. New South Wales Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
  3. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
  4. Canada Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
  5. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
  6. Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
  7. London Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
  8. Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Poland Piotrus (submissions), Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions), Michigan Dana boomer (submissions), Prince Edward Island Status (submissions), United States Ed! (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), England Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 06:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

LivingBot, grid refs coords on WLM lists

Hi, I've just seen LivingBot has returned to Grade I listed buildings in South Somerset "reconverting grid reference to coordinate pair to avoid OSG38/WGS84 datum conflict" and this is great, but where I have added Grid Ref since the last run it hasn't added the lat & long. Isthe bot able to do this? as I was told it was a waste of human time when I was adding these manually.— Rod talk 11:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rodw]. I've tweaked the bot and got it (on the second attempt!) to add those coordinates. I've also expanded the grid references to full form for consistency with the other listings (they could be changed en-masse to short form at a later date). In other cases, I could have used the bot to generate the grid references as well; it looks like the bot adjusted the coordinates slightly in some cases but I've checked the new ones and they seem correct. Were there any other articles in this category? - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 12:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I've also added Grid Refs with no lat or long to: Grade II* listed buildings in Mendip, Grade II* listed buildings in South Somerset & Grade II* listed buildings in Bath and North East Somerset.— Rod talk 12:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Grade II* listed buildings in Bristol is similar - but not yet complete.— Rod talk 13:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Grade II* listed buildings in Bristol is now pretty much complete, but quite a few of the rows have grid ref but no lat & long - could you work your magic. it also needs thatever you added to headers to make geocoding work if you have the time.— Rod talk 21:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

Please comment on Talk:Yelp, Inc.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Yelp, Inc.. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Clarify comments from GA review on Talk:History of macroeconomic thought

Would you mind clarifying some of your comments from your GA review of History of macroeconomic thought. I posted a few questions on the talk page there awhile ago. I'd like to bring this up to FA status, so any feedback would be appreciated.--Bkwillwm (talk) 02:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Grade II* listed buildings in York

Thank you for asking about the errors in this list. There are a several major problems.

One is that it is buildings, not the names, that are statutorily listed and the names in the EH list have no legal significance and used merely for identification by EH. They are certainly not canonical. The surveyors did their best, and any mistakes at the time of listing should have been picked up, but names and uses of the buildings change. Sometimes they are changed in the EH list, sometimes not. This is very confusing, especially where there is no linked article, but there are many instances where the name used by the current owner or occupier, as well as the public, differs from that used in an EH listing. It would be easier for users if there were columns for earlier uses of the building and alternative names but we do not have them.
The second problem is in the compiling of the WP list from EH data. I do not know understand how it occurred, and it is obvious in many of the lists. To take York railway station as an example, the EH list entry is for the entire station. There is a long description, which includes mention of a footbridge of 1938. The footbridge is not especially picked out and certainly not the most interesting element of the large and well known 1870s station. But the WP list had footbridge for type and the date of the footbridge as the date of completion of the entire building (it is not even the last of the dates included in the listing entry) and there is no obvious reason why anybody should have made the error if they had been compiling the list manually. There are many such mistakes.
The third problem is that many entries have no identifying name at all - there is a long list of houses with no street name, for example.
The fourth big problem is the complete lack of structure or order in the default list order. It is not alphabetical, and even if it were, sometimes churches are named as 'church of' sometimes not (redundant as the list is sortable by type). Nor is the list geographical, though adjacent buildings are sometimes together in the list. I invited views in the talk page of the Grade I list for York, but have had no response, but we need to agree a consistent approach. It might be best to sub-divide the list, but that would interfere with sorting.

I hope that helps. --AJHingston (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Next Oxford meetup

Hi, I see that Michaelmas Term begins Sunday 13 October. You'll probably be busy that day; shall I schedule the next Oxford meetup for Sunday 20 October or would a different date be better? --Redrose64 (talk) 19:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

@User:Redrose64: Actually the official start date is a little meaningless, the 13 October would actually be quite good. - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 21:51, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes, except that London have already bagged that date, and if there is a clash, WereSpielChequers (talk · contribs) tends to go to London, as do some others. We clashed with London last weekend and Oxford attendance was 3. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
London is almost always the second Sunday, so hopefully we are easy to avoid. ϢereSpielChequers 22:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
I've created m:Meetup/Oxford/9 with no date, and a discussion page at m:Talk:Meetup/Oxford/9, where I've copied part of the responses above. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

Please comment on Talk:WinCo Foods

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:WinCo Foods. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

downcasing titles

My attention has been drawn to a discussion at WT:AWB where you suggested applying title case as a general fix. The discussion ended without implementation, but I'd be interested in incorporating the code into my formatting script. I'd appreciate it if you advise me how I would integrate such code/function into it. Regards, -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 02:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jarry1250/Archive_15&oldid=1168302025"