User talk:Johnaemeth

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Johnaemeth! Thank you for your contributions. I am Swarm and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Swarm 21:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johnaemeth (talk) 18:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC){{adminhelp}}No question entered...[reply]

Nomination of Can Emed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Can Emed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can Emed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{adminhelp}} ok.. finally I edit the page I created called; "Can Emed" for good. I make reliable references for evry syntax. The references highed now at number;9 and I dig on google to find any difference source.

Now this situation is it solved now ???? (Can Emed)

I will here for a while, and soon I will leave for lunch... is any admin there can use a time for help? I NEED TECHNICAL HELP

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

If you wish to contest the deletion process then you must put your case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can Emed explaining what you have done, and why it should not be deleted. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Can Emed. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 16:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok.. finally I edit the page I created called; "Can Emed" for good. I make reliable references for evry syntax. The references highed now at number;9 - and I dig on google to find any difference source. Now this situation is it solved now ???? (Can Emed) I will here for a while, and soon I will leave for lunch... is any admin there can use a time for help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnaemeth (talk • contribs) 17:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Can, don't worry there is no hurry the discussion will go on for a minimum of a week, - an admin or someone will come along and assist some enough - no worries - regards. - Off2riorob (talk) 17:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering this artist has little information on the google and the internet, This article contains brief and trustable references about this artist. (Such verifiable references as; ntvmsnbc.com etc.). And this artist (Can Emed) is not have that fame as other great artists such as Picasso. And so the less number (9 Reference)of references maybe view as "balanced". And the article contains "not long" and "not exaggerated" informations about Can Emed. The article also contains balanced, verifiable informations that can be verified on the internet by an international-artists-organisations such as; UNESCO/AIAP/UPSD such is also a reference. The article contains 3 clean photograph, one is taken on the artist's exhibition-reception. And so, there is not an argument here such as this artist (Can Emed) is really living person. And so, I cannot clearly understand why this page is on "deletion process" I'm university degree class knowledge about especially art, history of art and contemporary art. Also I am the same person here. My purpose is for creating this article (Can Emed) about my self is trusting your independence. If any person who has a remarkable proffession on his/her work and knowned by internationally, can be freely opened an article about himself/herself. İf ---İf he uses balanced view, reliable sources, and verifiable references SUCH AS I DID on "Can Emed article". I dig on google and find nearly 9 trutable-reference on the internet. --If this is not view as; "resourcable", then there is not argument can stays here on the feet.. Becouse I still not understand the argument of the deletion process in "turned-on".

The fame is strange thing, even Kings, and Emperors can't stand against a fame on history.... This word approved by history itself again and again continously. Today you can delete the article named by; Can Emed. And close-future, his international fans can try to open again and again. And you know that I'm right. You will heard Can Emed's name again on Wikipedia you can be sure of that.

If any wise web-master here, ıf any wise editor here, PLEASE I NEED YOUR HELP, NOT DELETION WITHOUT AN EXPLANATION ! I NEED TECHNİCAL HELP IMMEDIATELY................ I still trust your independence, and international wisdom. Sincerely Yours; User; Johnaemeth (Can Emed)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

" Off2riorob " I see that you are the one, who brings up the deletion process on tha Can Emed Article... CARE TO EXPLAİN YOUR; "DELETION ARGUMENTS" TO SHARE WİTH ME ?????

You can find Off2riorob's reason/explanation at this link. CLICK HERE!.--v/r - T P 21:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mhahahah!!! :D "promotion of a person with limited note" it is interesting you know ? :D ..Becouse 1 weeks ago, I'm informed about "cleaning your long-notes". And now, it turns; "promotion of a person with limited note" mhahahahah!! ..Go ahead, FREELY, AND BRAVELY SAY; "I DO NOT WANT YOUR PAGE ON WIKI; ARTİST CAN EMED" ..I'm mature person dude you know, last week I broke up my ex-girl friend, and I am not in the mood now. Please be an adult, "I STILL DO NOT SEE THE DELETION ARGUMENT OF THAT PAGE" :pP :D ;) Sinrerely yours; " Off2riorob " :D I'm still laughing for good (reaaly) :D

No worries - girlfriends come and go - just wave them farewell and wish them good luck - as a note - you can/should add - Keep - to your comment at the AFD, I will add it for you if you want. Off2riorob (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for your good words about my ex.. ;) But I'm worried about my page instead of my ex :D I'm worried about that matter..... Off2riorob ;)

Your recent edits

You sort of seem to be making posts that appear as though someone else wrote them. Please be careful about that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Anna Frodesiak ;) you always tried to informed and advised me on the "Can Emed article" issues.. you always welcomed ;) But unfortunately I will continue to seek the informations for "Deletion-Nomination".. If ı cannot understand the specific-reasons and the specific-arguments of why the process still continues... Then I cannot solve the matter for good.. Yes?

So, unfortunately I will continue to posting, becuse, simply I cannot understand... One weeks ago, there is another process that this article "needs to be cleared".. and one-weeks after there is deletion-process which I informed that the article is contains "short-information"... İs this an Irony or I is it a coincidence ??????????

I hope you can easily understand my reason for my questions to the wiki-team .............

Good luck with the deletion. I hope it works out for you. But again, you sort of seem to be making posts that appear as though someone else wrote them. Please be careful about that. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My edits to your userpage

Please dont be upset. What i did was to move your article on yourself (its you, right?) back to your sandbox, and break the Category links, and put a banner on the top so it will not be mistaken for an article. i did these actions so that if anyone reviews your user pages, they will not see what could appear to be an attempt to create an "article" in the userspace, which is not allowed. I have no opinion at this time on whether you are considered notable by WP standards, so I am assuming good faith here, and setting the article info back into the proper format for "userfication" WP:USERFY. If you want to try to recreate the article at some future date, with better references, I am fine with that, though i may not agree that you pass notability. Having done all this, i will now go back and read your sandbox page, as a courtesy. Oh, and good luck in your endeavors. I am a SF fan, just trying to clean up the science fiction category. Please feel free to ask me any questions.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]