User talk:Kai a simon

Welcome!

Hello, Kai a simon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --The Dwarf_King 14:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information management

Thanks for your large contribution to Information management. You provided two references. Could you provide more so we could better verify the content per Wikipedia policy WP:Verifiability? Thanks. --Ronz 16:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronz, I agree that two paragraphs needed additional referencing, which I have added now. The remaining content is covered by the two original references. --Kai a simon 11:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Ronz 15:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Additions to Organization

I just wanted to give you a friendly heads-up. I reverted the additions that you made to the matrix organization section of Organization. It's not because I didn't think that it was a good addition, but because that section is purposefully short because there is already an article at Matrix management (and another at Matrix Management - don't ask me why). You might want to consider is those additions can be worked in there. If you feel differently, and decide to reinsert your additions, I won't fight it. Happy editing! -- Pawl 05:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pawl, I can understand you reversion, given the additional articles on Matrix Management, but I still believe that the matrix section on the Organization page could need some improvement. The text is superficial. --Kai a simon 11:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Note - I had already typed this before you responded on my talk page - for some reason, I couldn't save, so I set it aside.) I'm by no means an expert - I still consider myself new to wikipedia - and if like, we can call in an "expert" opinion. All that follows is simply my understanding.

The text in such a section is supposed to be short. Yes, it probably could be improved, and maybe should be fleshed out some. It just doesn't need a full explanantion, when the article already points to the matrix management article. Remember, the hypothetical average reader of the Organization article is presumably looking for an overview of the topic. If they read something that makes them think, "Ah, I want more information on that" then they can follow the link provided to a more detailed article.

What do you think? -- Pawl 15:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest a minor edit of the matrix section on the Organization page to make it a little more "...pedia"-like and a merge of my extension into the Matrix Management article, which, by the way, really should be merged with the Matrix management one, maybe under the name of Matrix organization (which currently redirects to Organization with a redirect from both other terms. --Kai a simon 18:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Business Process

Thanks for your note. I made a few more remarks about the edited version of Business process at Talk:Business process. Still not convinced that the article really has a subject. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like you, I am enjoying the discussion on Talk:Business process, but I think we should move the discussion somewhere else. I see you have a blog, but I can't see a link to it. Perhaps if I put something on my blog, you could respond on yours? --RichardVeryard 07:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC) èèè[reply]

That seems to be a good idea. WP article discussion pages are not really well suited for this kind of discussion. We also seem to have scared off Keith (Swenson), who was the originator of the discussion. BTW, your name seemed familiar and I realized that you referred to the inscription and loose coupling ideas that I developed with a colleague in a blogpost in September 2005. Kai A. Simon 08:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I remember you now. But where is your blog? I can't find a link on your User page. And where is your dissertation? I have a link to a page on the Göteborg University website, which you sent me previously and is now defunct. --RichardVeryard 11:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The blog can be reached via my web-site. The link to the site is on my user page, and there you will also find my dissertation and other publications. Since my former dept at Göteborg University does not exist anymore in the old form, I had to give up my site there. However, right now, I am posting rarely, since there is a new policy in our company regarding blogging and I first want to have a green light from corpcomm. Kai A. Simon 17:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Health and intelligence

Why did you tag this? Can you explain more on the talk page? I don't think it needs to be tagged.futurebird 20:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on the article's talk page. Kai A. Simon 21:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Benedito Nunes

Dear Kai a simon,

Thank you for your help in the article Benedito Nunes.

Sincerely,

JP Watrin 22:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on user's talk page. Kai A. Simon 22:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kai a simon, I came to thank your help because I was unsecure. My English is on a basic level and is very bad for the write, so I was afraid to make a mistake. The article in portuguese also needs of this kind of information. Thank you for the help again! - JP Watrin 03:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 14:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serrenia rephrase

your fast response on Serrenia was suprisingly fast, and im aware that it does seem advertising in a way, but that is becuase im not done with it, i will rephrase it and add a gallery of the project, and adding a stub under "

This article about a Middle Eastern building or structure is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

".

thank you for your notice...

Lauri Hamalainen

Hi Kai

I got your message regarding Lauri Hamalainen's article on Wikipedia. I was going to create an article for all of Kemopetrol's members and at the time, I done them Laura & Lauri but deleted them afterwards as I did not feel I had enough information. My only source was the bands' website.

I was not aware of article tagging & delete requests until now, so thank you for bring it to my attention & if I have caused any trouble, I apologise.

Take care & all the best. Lee (Le-Foxall)

Answered on user's talk-page. Kai A. Simon 10:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Jonathan Vogels

Hi Kai a simon, I guess you're right about this page. It was deleted to quickly to put up a fight, but I guess the page wasn't really essential, even though the person was an author, there wouldn't be anybody looking him up too often. Thanks for your help. Adam 00:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aftanoon;

Cassiya

When people stop making links that do not correspond to articles, I will stop making articles to correspond to those links. There is nothing uglier than a red link that goes nowhere. have a nice day!

Interlaker 21:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on user's talk page Kai A. Simon 21:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cassiya: can i recreate it?

I wouldn't contest (and even support) a recreation, if the article content is meeting wikipedia standards. I looked up the band and they indeed have a number of records, even though I have no idea whether they are notable outside their home island. But I assume that we would be able to find less notable bands here. Just be sure to include external sources to back up the notability claim. Regards. Kai A. Simon 20:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sure , in doing it straight away

many thanks for your encouragement and suggestion , im nor editing the same now , btw i wish you to assist me to get a copy of my article that was deleted due to some reason "tfquasar international" , if u r a administrator then i wish to place the request here it self , if not then kindly help me to get the same , though im in wikipedia for many years in still a newbie in writing articles so m trying to keep pace with the standard . regardsPearllysun (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I won't be able to get you the article back. I know it won't help for the deleted one, but consider to keep a local copy of your articles. Kai A. Simon (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Tada Catering

Dear Kai a simon,

I am going to have to contest the deletion of Tada Catering. I was not trying to advertise in any way. I was simply trying to inform. Shelleylyn, the owner of Tada, is my sister. I was just creating the Wiki page to inform people about her and what shes done. I will tell you right now she doesn't even need advertising, she is one of the largest scale caterers in the U.S. I was just trying to inform the world of what she has achieved and the services and clients her business offers to. She is a true "fairy tale" success story, we came from the poorest of the poor and we had nothing in our childhoods. She rose up and did everything herself to make a name for the family. So I have to place a <hangon> on the Tada Catering page. I do not know how to do this because I am a new user to Wikipedia editing. What can I do Kai a simon? What can I do to keep the Tada Catering Wikipedia page alive. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks

Sincerely, User Matt Janse

Responded on User Talk:Mattjanse. Kai A. Simon (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is Wikipedia worthy?

There are articles on Wikipedia about "thrash metal" bands that have like 2 fans, poop, and words that are not even officially part of the English language. I don't think these should be included in the Encyclopedia Britannica, there on Wikipedia? The success story factor is just what made me feel compelled to write a Wikipedia article, that is not even what the article was about. It was informing people about the services Tada Catering has and what makes them a revolutionary catering service. She is the biggest caterer in the music industry. I think that deserves a Wikipedia article. If a kid goes to the Vans Warped Tour, which has a Wikipedia article, and wonders how the bands eat every day for two months without eating crap or fast food, Tada Catering would be the answer. I took a while out of my day to gather information for that article, not to mention i am a slow typer. I would like to at least get what I typed back and be able to change it so Wikipedia can display it. If you can't help me can you pass this to somebody that can please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattjanse (talk • contribs) 19:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. There are articles that probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. And, if I find such an article, I will propose it for deletion. But please let me state it again: What you are attempting to write sounds like a advert-style article. May I propose to have a look at the Notability Guideline for organizations and companies.

If you want to get your article back, you might get i touch with the admin that actually deleted it. You can find the name when trying to open the Tada Catering page. You will then see a note that the page has been removed and also see the username of the admin that removed it.

Hope that helps. Kai A. Simon (talk) 20:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AIESEC

Hello, I noticed by your userbox that you are an AIESECer. As a wikipedian I would like to encourage you to edit AIESEC as this page needs much improvement. Thanks for the help. --vierstein^talk|Contrib 01:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Kai a simon,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of RISE Viktoria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RISE Viktoria, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.viktoria.se/node/1454. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Animalparty. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Desiré Dubounet, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Animalparty! (talk) 01:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]