User talk:King Molala

Welcome!

Hello, King Molala, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! – NJD-DE (talk) 17:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Last Krm (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Last Krm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Last Krm, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, King Molala! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:51, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King Molala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry Sir I don't understand why I was blocked because I just reversed edits which is not vandalism and the users I reversed edits from where clearly not here to build Wikipedia and you didn't even tell me what I did wrong you just blocked me without even a warning if you can check my edit history you will see I'm here to build Wikipedia, if I didn't something wrong it was a mistake I'm sorry for it i hope i get ublocked thank you

Decline reason:

really obvious abuse of multiple accoounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

King Molala (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's review what you've done since creating your account on September 1:

The first thing you did was to create Draft:William Last Krm, a Botswanian rapper/comedian. You uploaded a picture of a cover of one of Krm's singles and claimed it was your own work. It's a clear copyright violation that you got from one of many websites where the cover appears.
You then created your own userpage with userboxes on it.
You then created another draft about a South African actress.
From then on you did mostly a mix of counter-vandalism, including warnings at user Talk pages; and Welcoming new users, more than half of which had never made any contributions. You included in your Welcome messages a very bizarre close-up of a cut apple. It was a poor picture, and at first I thought it was pornographic. It was uploaded by someone else in 2008, and until you used it, had not been used on en.wiki.

The above is a mixture of disruption, policy violations, and, at the same time, indicates you have edited on Wikipedia before. What accounts have you used?--Bbb23 (talk) 21:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I never used Wikipedia before the drafts I did I was looking at other articles in Wikipedia and about the cover I used in my first draft I downloaded it I thought it was copyright free sorry about that, I did know welcoming users that didn't make their first edit was wrong also about the apple picture I just guessed apple.jpg I'm sorry about it also, I'm sorry about the mistakes I made I promise I will try all my best to never repeat such mistake henceforth I will be careful while editing in Wikipedia please unblock me. I hope you consider my request thank you King Molala (talk) 22:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually their first action was to thank me for an old edit. It was odd but back then didn't think about it further and just posted a welcome message here. Things are making sense now though: There's clearly an overlap between two users in the history of the article where I had been thanked for and edits by King Molala: Draft:William Last Krm/Draft:Willam Last Krm. – NJD-DE (talk) 23:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My, my. In addition to Gosego Nkwadzile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who created the other draft, I also noticed Moatlhodi Nkwadzile (Jutas) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). In addition to the other similarities, the three accounts' userpages are remarkably similar. Given that all three accounts are blocked already, the only action I will take now is to tag the accounts. It wouldn't surprise me if there were more, but I'm not sure that a CheckUser would find them. NJD-DE, many thanks for your excellent eye.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, CheckUser is not useful here; this is one of those places where there are dozens if not hundreds of other users on each of the dozens of IPs this one has used. Nothing nefarious, just the nature of the assignment of mobile IPs in some countries. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 00:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NJD-DE William Last Krm is a popular musician anyone can think of making an article about him anyone who did a draft about him you can't just say it's me and I did a draft about Kamogelo Molatlhoe Which means if you find someone who tried to do it you will say it is me, also I didn't know it was wrong to thank someone and I checked Gosego Nkwadzile 's history none of his edit showed he was here to build Wikipedia all he did was Vandalism non of his edits are similar to mine, you can check my edits and you can see I was trying to do what I thought was right I didn't do any vandalism to Wikipedia please don't make Wikipedia not a welcoming place for new users Bbb23 Please unblock me I promise you will never get any complaints about me, if I do any vandalism you may block me and never unblock me Thank You. King Molala (talk) 03:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

jpgordon I noticed that you rejected my unblock request reason being because of abusing multiple accounts even though I have no connection with the mentioned accounts I'm here by requesting for unblock you will keep an eye on me I promise I will not disappoint you I will follow all the rules of Wikipedia please give me a last chance. If it is not possible for me to be unblocked just tell me I will not have a problem. Thank You King Molala (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King Molala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, i promise not to do any vandalism to Wikipedia. Thank You

Decline reason:

This request does not address the reason for your block, which is abuse of multiple accounts. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

King Molala (talk) 09:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Carter County, Missouri

You have incorrectly identified my edits to the Carter County, Missouri page as vandalism. These edits provided updated information regarding elections and public officials while replacing old and in some cases outdated information. I would appreciate it if you could restore these edits. If not, I will do so manually.

Sorry for identifying your edits as Vandalism if you were updating the information you may restore them but include reliable sources on your edits or references thank you. King Molala (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King Molala (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked, the admin who blocked me claimed I abused multiple accounts, the evidence that I abused multiple accounts was because I created William Last Krm draft and they told me someone created it before so I'm that person, lol seriously ? When I reviewed my block I noticed I was even blocked before their false evidence, why ? If Creating William Last Krm draft means I am someone who created it before Who created William Last Krm why is he or she not blocked, I think the admins made a mistake please unblock me , if the admins who blocked me think I'm wrong , tell them to convince me I'm wrong because they are wrong, Everyone is allowed to edit in Wikipedia so please bring my rights back because I didn't vandalize anything and I didn't do anything wrong , the only mistake I did I'm sorry for it was welcoming users who didn't make their first edit. King Molala (talk) 14:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Generally, more of a rant than a serious request, really. But where you truly fail, to me, is "everyone is allowed to edit Wikipedia". Uh, no ... that's "anyone". There is a difference, which, admittedly, you may not be too keen on appreciating at the moment. But it's still there. And even in your formulation, "everyone" cannot edit because then we would have to not block people, and have no rules. "Everyone" is welcome to edit as long as they do so within policy, and at least with the intent of doing so productively.

I really don't see a serious understanding of that in your request. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Daniel Case I'm not that good in English so sorry for confusing anyone with everyone, Lol I tried to stay within the policy but I was only blocked for creating a draft, I was editing my draft in peace without disturbing anyone or anything in Wikipedia then I was blocked, do you know how it feels to be blocked for something you don't know ? If I was blocked for something I know or something I did it would've been better, instead of blocking users who vandalize Wikipedia you block someone innocent like me . You guys are stressing me. King Molala (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]