User talk:Kornatice

Kornatice, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kornatice! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Stegnogramma griffithii moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stegnogramma griffithii, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). For instance, you need a reference to the fact the plant was discovered by Thomas Moore or that it is considered endangered.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting article expansion help

Greetings

Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and please do expand them if find yourself interested.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would be glad to help. Kornatice (talk) 03:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your contributions and continued support to the above topics.

Bookku (talk) 07:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ayat Allah Elanouar

The article Ayat Allah Elanouar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't pass the qualifications of WP:NSPORT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Corsica, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 08:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. The reason I did it was because it wasn't well written from a grammar standpoint, and it didn't seem terribly important anyway, at least not in the lead section, but whatever. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Kornatice (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Corevette. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 15:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Please accept this goat as a token of apology for my mistaken SPI report.

― Tartan357 ^Talk 17:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm glad that everything was cleared up. Kornatice (talk) 17:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stegnogramma griffithii

Hello, Kornatice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stegnogramma griffithii, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stegnogramma griffithii has been accepted

Stegnogramma griffithii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 16:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI where I mentioned you

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Taung Tan. Thank you. I mentioned you because another editor was brought up one of your old edits. There's nothing for you to worry about as there's no suggestion by anyone you did anything that is of concern. Nil Einne (talk) 12:59, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aaron Bean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action News Jax. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aaron Bean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action News Jax.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help you offered on page style.

Thanks. I think I've figured it out now.

What I wanted was the Vector2010 skin and what I needed to remember was to click was "Save" at the bottom of the "Appearance".

But that procedure is far from intuitive. —— Shakescene (talk) 20:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Police station (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Police station (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Demonoftewp

Fuck you you piece of crap — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demonoftewp (talk • contribs) 18:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I see that you created the redirect for Fairy Meadpws as a mispelling of Fairy Meadows National Park. Do you know if this is a common misspelling? At a glance it doesn't appear to be but maybe you're aware of context that I'm not. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:19, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It probably isn't common. Kornatice (talk) 20:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. I figured I'd ask. I've seen some redirects that look unlikely from my perspective but actually are fine (like Scarling. – the period is a stylization). Communication tends to be a good thing. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fairy Meadpws

A tag has been placed on Fairy Meadpws requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:André d'Ypres

Hello, Kornatice. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:André d'Ypres, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~maa

What does this mean in your edit summaries? Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:45, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a little signature. Kornatice (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, abbreviations in edit summaries mean something, such as "rvv" = "revert vandalism" or "ce" = "copyedit" (see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_summary_legend/Quick_reference this). I'm afraid that using an abbreviation to stand for a personal signature is likely to confuse editors, especially since "~mma" doesn't have any obvious connection to your username. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your username identifies you as the user who made the edit. Your "little signature" is neither helpful nor necessary. Eric ^talk 02:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kornatice. Thank you for your work on Roman Catholic diocese. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

this needs to go to the diocese article and catholic section

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:17, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF: That's fine with me. Kornatice (talk) 22:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Ronaldo (diambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ronaldo (diambiguation) to the article Ronaldo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 20 § Redirects with "(diambiguation)" until a consensus is reached.

CS1 error on Denver

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Denver, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing helpful links from articles about colleges and universities

Please stop removing helpful links from articles about universities e.g., University of California, Berkeley, University of California, Davis, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been removing them because they violate Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Specifically, from Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking: "When possible, do not place links next to each other, to avoid appearing like a single link". Kornatice (talk) 23:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing these essential links until you can demonstrate consensus to remove this very longstanding information from these articles. The guideline you have cited explicitly says that "it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions." Numerous other parts of the guideline support including these links.

If you disagree, I recommend you open a discussion at WT:UNI or Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking. ElKevbo (talk) 22:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ElKevbo: Could you give examples of "other parts of the guideline" that support the links? Kornatice (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. First, the specific sentence you quoted above says "When possible, do not place links next to each other..." [emphasis added]. So it's not a complete ban on the practice. This is further emphasized in the summary of the entire guideline where it specifically says "it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply."

The most specific part of the guideline that strongly supports the links that you have advocated for removing is that links should be provided for "[a]rticles explaining words of technical terms. The example provided in the guideline of a lede section with appropriate links specifically notes that links should be provided for "common words [that] have technical dimensions that are specifically relevant to the topic" and words such as public and private most certainly meet those criteria. ElKevbo (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Denver

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Denver, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:JOBTITLE

Hi! I'm about to point this out at MOS:JOBTITLE, but I think you may have just discovered a mistake in MOS:JOBTITLE—not like an external mistake, but an internally inconsistent mistake. We'll see!--Jerome Frank Disciple 01:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sega Sports R&D

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sega Sports R&D, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gnoming

Please do not gnome. Contribute by writing articles instead. You have already been warned by another editor. Edit warring may result in loss of editing privileges. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Gnoming" is a constructive and important task on Wikipedia which I will continue. I don't know who you think has warned me, but I have never seen that. Kornatice (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Òrange Democratic Party (Kenya)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Òrange Democratic Party (Kenya) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 15 § Òrange Democratic Party (Kenya) until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 23:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For all you do around here... It's appreciated. Volten001 ^☎ 12:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Thanks a lot! Kornatice (talk) 18:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for List of United States state legislatures

An article that you have been involved in editing—List of United States state legislatures—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 19:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]