User talk:Krotch Lockman
January 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm Οἶδα. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Katie Halper, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Οἶδα (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Herostratus. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Mariah Carey that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Herostratus (talk) 12:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, Krotch Lockman. Cullen328 notified you have BLP policy and discretionary sanctions, I suggest you stop reverting at Lauren Boebert and read the relevant policies. You may not use court records and birth certificates per WP:BLPPRIVACY. YODADICAE👽 00:50, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Farrah Abraham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 22:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Farrah Abraham, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk 22:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- The page at https://artsandculture.google.com/ claims Wikipedia is its source of information; Wikipedia may not be used as a source for itself. See WP:CIRCULAR. Birthdates require reliable sources. See WP:BLPPRIVACY. General Ization Talk 22:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dad Stop Embarrassing Me!, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 22:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read MOS:NUMERAL before making similar edits. Thanks! – The Grid (talk) 00:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fuck wit Dre Day (And Everybody's Celebratin'), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Mia Khalifa. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Riley Reid. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 13:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- LADBible is an inappropriate source to use for wikipedia.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Important notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
What was the change
[edit]What part was added or deleted from the prior versions. Can I get a list of updates from original wiki page? 174.212.162.183 (talk) 21:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
February 2022
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Ritter. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
April 2022: Don't add unsourced chart positions
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Red Hot Chili Peppers discography, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 22:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Ss112 You found the source yourself. Thanks for playing! Krotch Lockman (talk) 22:22, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is a really bad take and I suggest you revert your comment and commit to actually sourcing your edits otherwise you're going to wind up at ANI with a block or a ban. CUPIDICAE💕 22:34, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Ss112 Fair enough. My reply was hasty. Krotch Lockman (talk) 22:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
[edit] Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Christine Blasey Ford, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HaeB (talk) 06:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
All these warnings
[edit]You're sure making a lot of unnecessary work for editors who try a keep this project up to date, clean and basically cosistent and it pretty evident you're not helping at all, maybe you should find something else to do while you're online. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 00:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Black Sabbath (album). - FlightTime (open channel) 00:17, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at The Police (album). Please stop changing numbers represented as words to numbers represented as figures. MOS:NUMBER allows for both so it's not broken - don't fix it. Muhandes (talk) 11:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Final disruption warning
[edit]You've been warned several times that the MOS allows for textual numbers, per MOS:NUMERAL, but you continue to disrupt to alter these to be numerals.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 19:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Canterbury Tail talk 12:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Numeral
[edit]Despite already having had a block you continue to ignore MOS:NUMERAL and proceed with what can only now be described as deliberate disruptive editing. If you continue to change simple worded numbers into numerals, against MOS:NUMERAL, you will be blocked. I don't know how I can make this clearer. Canterbury Tail talk 13:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Newimpartial (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jason David Frank, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Rockchalk717 19:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at You Know My Name (Look Up the Number). Sundayclose (talk) 03:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
February 2023
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SoWhy 14:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for May 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Love Explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love and Kisses.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Yes, Krooth
[edit]Hi. There is an ongoing thread related to a bold edit which you performed in Penélope Cruz on 30 August 2023. See Talk:Penélope Cruz. Are you acquainted with intrincacies of the pronunciation of Peninsular Spanish varieties (in this case the Madrid one)? Cited source is an English-language video report/interview on CBS, mentioning the "actual" (presumably meaning the native one) pronunciation of her name at 5 min 00 min.--Asqueladd (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit] Hello, I'm CurryTime7-24. An edit that you recently made to Shemp Howard seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! CurryTime7-24 (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Twelve-bar blues. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been warned about MOS:NUMERAL before. Please stop making disruptive edits. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 13:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Continued disruptive editing
[edit]You've been blocked twice for disruptive editing and violating the Manual of Style (specifically the one on MOS:NUMERALS) yet you continue with your pattern of disruptive editing. Your page is just jam packed with warnings and you don't seem to want to use talk pages. Since this disruption has been going on for a very long period of time without you changing your editing patterns, it comes across that it is a deliberate choice and not just mistakes or lack of knowledge. You've been pointed to all out policies, guidelines and MOS on multiple occasions and your time here is more than sufficient for you to have become aware of what is expected of editors on the project. So at this point it's one of a couple of options. 1) You're deliberately making these edits. 2) You're unable to understand the editing expectations. I'm not sure which is it, but I'm giving you one final warning of your disruptive edits. The next time you make a disruptive edit on Wikipedia you will be blocked indefinitely. So here is your chance to prove that you can edit in a collaborate manner according to our MOS, guidelines and policies. Canterbury Tail talk 14:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Canterbury Tail You spent a good portion of your day to write this nonsense? Krotch Lockman (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]As you have decided, of your own free will, to continue disruptive editing, and as you were very clearly warned of the consequences of continuing disruptive editing above, you have been blocked from editing. You have clearly demonstrated that you do not care about any of our policies, guidelines or even any respect for fellow editors and it's obvious through your choices that you have no intention to change and as a result you're not a fit for the project. Canterbury Tail talk 14:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.