Jump to content

User talk:Lb01234

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Durraz0. I noticed that you recently removed content from Himarë without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Durraz0 (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the changes I made, which were clearly mentioned and based on official Albanian institutions’ information, are constantly being altered by users who appear to be Greek nationalists. These users present themselves as simple contributors, but their references are often based on presumptive articles or sources unrelated to the topic. They are not referring to the main reliable source, which is the country’s own census of population and demographics. This behavior is disrupting the accuracy and reliability of the demographic section.
I request immediate attention to this matter to ensure that the information remains accurate and based on reliable sources. Lb01234 (talk) 01:59, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lb01234 reported by User:Khirurg (Result: ). Thank you. Khirurg (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 21:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]
Welcome Lb01234!
Hello Lb01234. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk(Leave me a message) 21:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Orientem (talk) 21:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated Vandalism and Misleading Edits on Demographic Sections in south Albanian villages

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lb01234 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Unfortunately, the changes I made, which were clearly mentioned and based on official Albanian institutions’ information, are constantly being altered by users who appear to be Greek nationalists. These users present themselves as simple contributors, but their references are often based on presumptive articles or sources unrelated to the topic. They are not referring to the main reliable source, which is the country’s own census of population and demographics. This behavior is disrupting the accuracy and reliability of the demographic section. I request immediate attention to this matter to ensure that the information remains accurate and based on reliable and official sources. Lb01234 (talk) 02:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Edit warring is unacceptable. There are proper ways to deal with content disputes. Edit warring is not one, as everyone in an edit war thinks that they are correct. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What you are describing is a content dispute which cannot justify edit warring. I suggest you review WP:DR for tips on how to handle disputes while you wait for your block to expire. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion by use of sockpuppet accounts., as you did at Himarë. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
information Administrator note I have extended your block to one week for block evasion/socking. Any further disruptive editing and/or attempts at evading your block will result in your being indefinitely blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Renald.Bejtja per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Renald.Bejtja. It has been blocked from editing for a period of 2024-10-25T15:36:59Z to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
RoySmith (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]