User talk:Livingstone Imonitie

Welcome!

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tunde Lemo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 19:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tunde Lemo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tunde Lemo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 19:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links

Please do not link common nouns like "this", as you did here. These link to disambiguation pages, not actual articles, and can cause problems. bd2412 T 11:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of languages in Nigeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chip, Chamba, Bele, Bura, Bina, Boki, Challa, Buji and Buli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of languages in Nigeria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Diba, Buta, Daba, Ekoi, Daza and Gusu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tunde Lemo

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of languages in Nigeria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chama and Diba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of languages in Nigeria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daba, Gubi and Jere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of languages in Nigeria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Zarma and Zabara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Davido, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Harry Uzoka

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Harry Uzoka.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:43, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Verification in the lead

Hi there,

I've undone a number of your most recent edits to politicians, on the basis of MOS:LEADCITE. Generally speaking, the lead paragraph of any article doesn't require citations because the lead paragraph summarises the body of the article (which contains the appropriate verification). This is to avoid repetition in citations. An exception to this would be for material that is likely to be challenged, or deemed controversial. Thanks, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MOBicure

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MOBicure, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://mobicure.biz/about.php. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akanimo Odon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Mahveotm (talk) 10:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mobicure

Hello Livingstone Imonitie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mobicure for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 07:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mina Margaret Ogbanga moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mina Margaret Ogbanga, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mobicure

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Mobicure, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:05, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mobicure for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobicure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobicure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mina Margaret Ogbanga (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nosebagbear was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The interviews have little independent content on Ogbanga (it's almost entirely either questions or from her herself). As such, biographical notability isn't established.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mina Margaret Ogbanga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mina Margaret Ogbanga, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nosebagbear (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nosebagbear (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abiodun Falodun

Hello Livingstone Imonitie,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abiodun Falodun for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DannyS712 (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking.
Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I want to let you know that your recent contribution to United Kingdom has been undone because it is not constructive. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 08:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bola Odeleke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, University of Benin (Nigeria), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 22:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yemi Osinbajo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yaba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mina Margaret Ogbanga

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mina Margaret Ogbanga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Debrah Eunice Osagiede

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Debrah Eunice Osagiede requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Debrah Eunice Osagiede, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Debrah Eunice Osagiede, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page List of churches in Nigeria, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have no relationship or connection with the person/place I wrote about. I found the subject notable and decided to create a page for her.

I am not in contact with her or her organization neither have I received any form of compensation from her.

However, I appreciate the feedbacks Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Debrah Eunice Osagiede

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Debrah Eunice Osagiede requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lapablo (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sock pupperty

A new user who joined Wikipedia two days ago was blocked for sock pupperty and I was blocked too because of same IP address.

I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere. I've been on Wikipedia for 2 years now and never shared my device with anyone.

I appeal for the blocked to be removed as I am unfairly punished for a crime I did not commit. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 09:49, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Livingstone Imonitie. Thank you for directly emailing me about this autoblock problem, caused by my blocking of User:Globalgistng12. I have replied by email, and will attempt to fix this for you. (The guidance to new users at Wikipedia:Autoblock seems extraordinarily confusing, and I am struggling to understand the process myself. So it seems unfair of my just to say 'follow the instructions' and leave you to it). Nick Moyes (talk) 11:28, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nick for the reply.

I've also sent an appeal to the blocking administrators. I'll keep my fingers crossed and hope for the best.

Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 11:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock-Auto

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Livingstone Imonitie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

129.205.113.80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Sock puppetry

Blocking administrator: Nick Moyes (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Procedural decline only. You need to properly fill in the unblock-auto fields in order for us to find the block. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were two active autoblocks of Globalgistng12 by Nick Moyes; I've removed both. —Cryptic 13:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Cryptic

Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 16:04, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Livingstone Imonitie: I am glad this was quickly sorted for you. Sorry you had the problem in the first place.

@Cryptic: Thank you for sorting this out for me. I would really welcome some guidance on dealing with this if it happens again. What did I fail to grasp in the guidance in lifting the autoblock myself, or is it only something that the blocked editor can appeal to have done via the autoblock template? Did they get essential information in their block notice that I couldn't access? I couldn't find an "#xxxxx number" at Special:BlockList, nor could I understand the instructions about looking in 'sections'in bullet point 3 at Template:Autoblock. As a new admin, this is the first issue I've encountered where I'm at a total loss to know how to handle it myself, and I feel I rather let this user down in not being able to sort it out quickly for them without amending my original block, and I see you hadn't altered it to remove that original autoblock of the sockpuppet. If you could give me a steer, I'd be really grateful. Thanks Nick Moyes (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They were both there. Clicking the "Hide single IP blocks" option to filter out the proxy-blocker-bot spam helps a lot; autoblocks are never indefinite, account, or range blocks, so you can hide those too; and you only have to search back 24 hours. —Cryptic 14:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AUTOBLOCK

Hello, I tried editing and I got a notification that I was autoblocked because my IP address was used by Gmlyrics.

I feel this is a misunderstanding because I did not share my device or network with anyone and I am being punished wrongly.

I have been editing for 2 years now and I am surprised this is happening again.

Please kindly unblock me so I can continuing adding content to Wikipedia.

Thank you. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 10:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of incorrect images to articles

Hello, I noticed your mass insertions of images, including c:File:Warren Miller.jpg on Warren L. Miller [1]. I can see this was done less than a minute after your previous edit, evidently without any conscious thought on your part, assuming you even read the article or the image description. Otherwise you would have seen how implausible it would be for the Warren Miller featured as a young man in Sporting Life in 1911 to still be receiving presidential appointments in 2001, at which point he would have been over 100 years old.

Please slow down your edits in future, and double-check all your mass image additions; since you have made this error, you have probably made others. – Teratix ₵ 01:11, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. I'll be more careful next time. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Try now

The autoblock should now be lifted. In the future, please use {{unblock-auto|...}} and properly fill in the fields. This will allow the block to be lifted more quickly. What's happening is that you are sharing your IP address with a number of spammers and other problematic editors in your area. That's not unusual, I'm afraid. Unfortunately, because of these spammers, you will be unable to edit from time to time. --Yamla (talk) 12:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the assistance. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 12:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect image

Hello Livingstone Imonitie, I saw that you added File:Kevin Smith VidCon 2012.jpg to Kevin Smith (editor) here. I had to revert your edit because that is a picture of a different Kevin Smith. You were already notified last week about adding incorrect images before by Teratix. Please slow down with your editing and double check your edits. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the delete label neshat jahandari

neshat jahandari This page is made for the only Iranian lady pilot who has been registered with all valid sources and this project is also available in Persian. I ask you to avoid deleting the page to introduce this person and they have written about him on various sites. Please help us not to delete the page and we will improve the page in the future Stmtm (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deb'rah Eunice Osagiede for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deb'rah Eunice Osagiede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deb'rah Eunice Osagiede until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 06:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification. I will check the article to see how to improve it so it doesn't get deleted Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gbemisola Ruqayyah Saraki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uju Obuekwe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Uju Obuekwe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 04:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will improve on the article. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 05:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uju Obuekwe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Uju Obuekwe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Fiddle Faddle 09:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uju Obuekwe (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has been returned from article space to draft space twice. If it is moved to article space other than by an AFC reviewer, it should be nominated for deletion.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uju Obuekwe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uju Obuekwe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello Livingstone Imonitie. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Uju Obuekwe, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Livingstone Imonitie. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Livingstone Imonitie|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ... discospinster _talk 01:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Discospinster, I believe there is a misunderstanding as I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits.

I felt the subject deserved a page and decided to write on it. All I'm doing is add to the open encyclopedia.

Thank you for reaching out. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell then where this image comes from? ... discospinster _talk 01:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Celestina007 thank you for the message.

The page Uju Obuekwe was not done in exchange for payment or any compensation. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed Paid Editing

Hello Livingstone Imonitie. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Uju Obuekwe, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Livingstone Imonitie. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Livingstone Imonitie|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uju Obuekwe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uju Obuekwe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uju Obuekwe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ebun Feludu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ebun Feludu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebun Feludu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. Celestina007 (talk) 16:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC) [reply]

hello, (user talk:Celestina007), i have responded that i did not receive or expect any form of payment for editing. I edit because i enjoy it not for reward. Livingstone Imonitie (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have told discospinster so but your actions via your new article contradict and betray that claim, continue down this path and you’d be indefinitely blocked from editing here. This is your third official warning. Celestina007 (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Livingstone Imonitie, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Livingstone Imonitie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was recently blocked indefinitely because it was investigated and seen that I was abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet. I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere because I do not have a multiple wikipedia accounts. Perhaps, maybe someone else was using my IP address or something. I humbly request to be unblocked. I feel I am been punished for something I have no idea about. Kindly look into thisLivingstone Imonitie (talk) 18:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Proecuedral decline only as this account is not blocked. If for some reason you find that you cannot edit, please make another appeal that includes the text of the block message you see when you try to edit. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You aren’t blocked, however your sock account @Esmeruby is. Celestina007 (talk) 18:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]