User talk:M0RD00R

File:Moshe Smoira stamp.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moshe Smoira stamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attack pages

Hi. When you are New Page Patrolling, it's important to read through the pages, because a regrettable number are disguised attacks, like two just now: Timas day which accused its subject of being gay, having been raped by the vicar etc, and Douchebags film which is clearly meant to suggest that the named people qualify for the title. When you see one of those the thing to do is, first blank it (it's still there in the history for the admin to check) and then tag it {{db-atk}} or {{db-g10}}. That puts it in a high-priority queue for admin attention, and generates a suitably fierce warning message for the author's talk page. Keep up the good work - NPP needs all the eyes it can get! JohnCD (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. Will keep in mind. M0RD00R (talk)

Our Lady of Zeitoun

I am not particularly impressed by what you have done to this article. After a couple of dozen edits (demonstrating a lack of planning) you have basically ended up with a sanitized mess. The original article had some cohesiveness. Now all that is left is a disjointed collection of random bits and pieces. Important research has been thrown away for no particular reason that I can see. New editors come along and run amuck over other people's careful work. Well, if this is how wikipedia works I want no further part in it. Danmav (talk) 03:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Lopukhin

Hi, I was wondering if my rewritten article could now be moved to replace the one on copyright-infringement notice. As far as I understand, I am not allowed to do so myself. Cheers --Ohjay (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of female stock characters (2nd nomination)

Since you participated in the first AFD, I am letting you know about the second AFD. Ikip (talk) 17:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

Thanks Reverting is not a way to choose the "correct" version. If Blogspot is used as a source, that is inappropriate. On the other hand, the edit that I saw included taking out SPRASD as a source, which is a legitimate one and inserting a {{fact}} tag in its place. That is not acceptable. You need to post on talk and seek consensus or make small and uncontroversial edits. This page has had a flurry of activity lately (as she's been in the news) and it's easy for legitimate edits to get swept away by mass deletions or large changes. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued reversion I cannot be involved in the intimate details of editing the page—I'm just going to revert it if I see any vandalism. I'm sure that you can find some middle ground on the talk page and if it keeps on devolving into edit-warring and vandalism, then I will post to WP:AN. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Hi, M0RD00R. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (3rd nomination), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Plakat nop.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Plakat nop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tetovo 2001.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tetovo 2001.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polish neo nazis.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Polish neo nazis.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:1977 Metro bombing.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:1977 Metro bombing.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]