User talk:MSMST1543

Welcome!

Hello, MSMSTest1543, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sahara did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Donald Albury 15:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the translation of the Arabic name without citing a reliable source, or obtaining a consensus on the talk page to do so. Please see the advice at WP:BRD. - Donald Albury 20:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Sahara. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Begoon 02:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sahara, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 03:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"YQ xWvX1n9g" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect YQ xWvX1n9g and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 15 § YQ xWvX1n9g until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Homophobia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain such edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Drmies: That category is for real phobias, not for terms that misuse the suffix "phobia". MSMST1543 (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well if you think that homophobia is not a real phobia, that's a thing you can discuss on the talk page. I disagree with your assessment, but that's a matter for consensus. And it's still a matter that calls for an explanation in an edit summary. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 21:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Windows XI

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Windows XI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_12#Windows_XI. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay 💬 09:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Media player (2022)

The part about Groove Music/Media Player (2022) in the Windows Media Player article hopes that you can help update Groove Music is not exclusive to Windows 10. Windows 11 was also built in and was replaced by Media Player (2022) after 2022. And 2023 At that time, Media Player (2022) has also replaced Groove Music in Windows 10. I hope you can help rewrite part of the description in the Windows Media Player article that mentions Groove Music/Media Player (2022). Groove Music was also included in Windows 11. Should the beginning of the article be adjusted? 2401:E180:8D00:D95F:5FA7:6E58:B433:6201 (talk) 14:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Association w/ Microsoft?

Hey @MSMST1543, I noticed that you've been editing a lot in Microsoft-related topics and that your username potentially implies an association with Microsoft. Just wanted to reach out and ask if you're associated with Microsoft in any way personally (e.g. as an employee or contractor). If so, I recommend adding a conflict-of-interest disclosure to your userpage. In particular, per Wikipedia's policy on paid editing, if you're being paid to edit Wikipedia you must disclose this information. Thanks! Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 16:26, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not associated with Microsoft in any way. MSMST1543 (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MiCrOsOfT

Hello MSMST1543,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MiCrOsOfT for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want MiCrOsOfT to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

greyzxq ^talk 21:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about This Very Wiki

Hello, MSMST1543

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username AngusWOOF and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect This Very Wiki, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5#This Very Wiki.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adobe's

Hello MSMST1543,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adobe's for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Adobe's to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

greyzxq ^talk 17:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Criticism of" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Criticism of has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Criticism of until a consensus is reached. Largoplazo (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikidatawiki

A tag has been placed on Wikidatawiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi MSMST1543! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Avicenna several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Avicenna, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Download manager, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 07:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Download manager, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coffeehouses and cafes

Hello, MSMST1543,

Just a reminder that category redirects are not created like an article redirect. Please look at the code/template on this page so you'll know how to create one again in the future should you wish to. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"One.one.one.one" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect One.one.one.one has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19 § One.one.one.one until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited XPath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Expression language. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Windows XI

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Windows XI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_12#Windows_XI. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay 💬 17:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfD discussions

Hi, Two redirects you recently created: Woketard and Woketards have been listed at WP:RfD. Please feel free to join in the discussion. Cheers, IceBergYYC (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Historical method, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Histories.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Windows XI

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Windows XI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_12#Windows_XI. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay 💬 22:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Windows Ⅺ

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Windows Ⅺ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. UtherSRG (talk) 00:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WİKİPEDİA. UtherSRG (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had looked, but not found any standard warnings from the drop-down for the kind of edits the user has been making. The user has relentlessly re-created redirects that were immediately deleted, and not made any attempt to reach out to the deleting admins, or initiate any conversation. Jay 💬 15:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A flow of edits that continues despite the evidence that they, in the aggregate, are problematic enough as to take up a large amount of time and attention from other users on the way to becoming undone amounts to disruptive editing, in my assessment. I don't think there's a level-4 user warning tag for disruptive editing, and I think that, rather than AIV, the next step is to file a grievance at WP:ANI. Largoplazo (talk) 16:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You vandalized Sun and moon letters by removing a clearly correct category. MSMST1543 (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG, indeed, I don't understand either why you removed that category. It seems suitable to me. Largoplazo (talk) 23:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting an edit is not vandalism. See WP:Vandalism for what is, and what is not vandalism. UtherSRG, since you used rollback, and not undo, I assume you saw the addition of the category as an obvious vandalism. Reverting the same edit twice, and without an edit summary, was within limits, but odd. Jay 💬 07:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"VVikipedia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect VVikipedia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 13 § VVikipedia until a consensus is reached. Largoplazo (talk) 02:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"WİKİPEDİA" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect WİKİPEDİA has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 13 § WİKİPEDİA until a consensus is reached. Largoplazo (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"メインページ" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect メインページ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 13 § メインページ until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"首页" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 首页 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 13 § 首页 until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 23:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 首页

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 首页 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 6#Wikipedia:Hauptseite. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Steel1943 (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of メインページ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on メインページ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 6#Wikipedia:Hauptseite. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Steel1943 (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WİKİPEDİA

A tag has been placed on WİKİPEDİA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 17:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WİKİPEDİA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WİKİPEDİA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_March_8#WİKİPEDİA. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay 💬 18:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A fox for you!

You creation of the redirect Free encyclopedia that anyone can edit was pretty good, made me laugh. Thanks for making my night a good one!

Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about 9jeJbdVl2jI

Hello, MSMST1543

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect 9jeJbdVl2jI, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 17 § 9jeJbdVl2jI.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]