User talk:MarekTT

Hello, MarekTT and welcome to Wikipedia. Several of your recent articles have been tagged for deletion. Whenever you create an article, it must have some content. Please do not create pages with the intention of "getting back to them later", wait until you have content to add to them. Also, whenever creating articles, please ensure that they meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. In the meantime, you may find these pages useful:

GhostPirate 19:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much indeed, I was about to add content few minutes later

MarekTT 19:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rajesh Ananda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —P ilotguy (ptt) 02:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BIO tags

Hi! Sorry, but I have placed speedy delete tags on your articles again today. Please read Wikipedia:Notability (people) to ensure that you write articles which are of importance. Unfortunatly, you can't place a note on the talk page suggesting that notability will be gained in the near future - that's called holding a page, which is also a criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any question, please ask. Rgds, - Trident13 12:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK friend, we will do our best (hopefully, if we can escape the festivities :)), thanks.

MarekTT 13:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Gururaj Ananda Yogi

I've nominated the article Gururaj Ananda Yogi for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Gururaj Ananda Yogi satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gururaj Ananda Yogi. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Gururaj Ananda Yogi during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Meditation for Spiritual Unfoldment

An editor has nominated the article Meditation for Spiritual Unfoldment for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meditation for Spiritual Unfoldment. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Meditation for Spiritual Unfoldment during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of http://www.ecvleonardo.com and http://www.ikme.org external links

Hi Marek. I've just reverted your recent addition of these links to multiple articles. Please take a look at our spam policy and our external links guidelines. Mass addition of links, especially to related websites are these two are, is generally frowned upon. You also added the links to many articles where there is only a tangential connection to the subject. Please resist the temptation to promote particular projects, however worthy, on Wikipedia. Thanks. -- Siobhan Hansa 13:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I has a user page

Wow! I almost forgot all of this :) seems that some of us people have too much free time in the world (sometimes). Anyway, I haS a user page now! One more junk for you to vandalize (with humour, I hope!) :)

ciaoooo MarekTT 23:45, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The White Eagle Lodge

I have nominated The White Eagle Lodge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The White Eagle Lodge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Foundation for International Spiritual Unfoldment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foundation for International Spiritual Unfoldment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for International Spiritual Unfoldment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]