User talk:Mischellemougly

CS1 error on Pampally

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pampally, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:19, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Midhun Asokan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Midhun Asokan. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akshithmanya ^talk 11:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ranjin Raj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Night Drive. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello Mischellemougly. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mischellemougly. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mischellemougly|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 08:15, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No way applicable to me. May I know which edit made you to think so ? Mischellemougly (talk) 09:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies then. We sometimes get undisclosed paid editing for people in the film industry. As it doesn't apply to you, please disregard. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 20:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ranjin Raj

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ranjin Raj, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for your message Mischellemougly (talk) 09:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mischellemougly. Thank you for your work on A Ranjith Cinema. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Will be adding reception section. Thank you for the suggestion. Mischellemougly (talk) 04:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rosemary Lillu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemary Lillu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Lillu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gautham Ramachandran

The article Gautham Ramachandran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable Filmmaker

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and hello@Liz

I Dpd te page: GR does seem to meet the guideline for notability, as director of two notable films at least. Best wishes -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rosemary Lillu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemary Lillu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Lillu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anup Pandalam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anup Pandalam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anup Pandalam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS ^💬 08:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Midhun Asokan

Hello, Mischellemougly. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Midhun Asokan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Jeraxmoira

Hello, Mischellemougly. You have new messages at Talk:Anup Pandalam.
Message added 06:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Midhun Asokan

Hello, Mischellemougly. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Midhun Asokan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Bhoomika Mirchandani

Hello Mischellemougly, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bhoomika Mirchandani, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhoomika Mirchandani.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you recently removed content from Harish Kalyan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:UNDUE Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, Thats a misinformation. I have fixed the page. Found a lot of unrelated contents and lot of issues with the page that needed fix. Reviews about the movie are to posted in movie pages and not in artist page. Or if there is any controversy it could be posted in a special Controversy section. I have removed only dead links and unrelated contents from the artist page and have made some fixed using few references. If you still wanted to add any negative controversial things, you may add in a section naming "Controversy" Mischellemougly (talk) 15:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying it's misinformation or unrelated content? Make up your mind first. Isn't Harish Kalyan the lead in the movies whose reviews you have deleted, specifically the negative ones? Are you being paid to remove the negative reviews? Is there a policy that says mixed/negative reviews shouldn't be in the articles' sections apart from the controversy section?

Why did you not remove Harish won positive critical acclaim for his performance as Prabhu Govind in the movie Dharala Prabhu (2020)? Is this not a review? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me. "Harish won positive critical acclaim for his performance as Prabhu Govind in the movie Dharala Prabhu (2020)", thats not a review of a movie, rather it talks about the artist and his roles in regards with the news reference. but the content I removed is unrelated to the artist page point of view. For example "whose wife has an illicit relationship with her father-in-law. Upon release, the film met with contrasting reviews, whilst some critics refused to give the film a rating, declaring their disgust at the film's plot." - What relevance does these sentences have in an artist page ? "Critics described his next role in the Thaman-musical Aridhu Aridhu (2010) as "okay", but the film also failed to take a strong opening at the box office.[11]" - "The 11th reference for this statement is a dead link so the sentence itself cant be backed by any reference. "The film showcased the changes our legal system demands, with Harish playing a spoilt brat who eventually turns over a new leaf in the film. The film opened to poor reviews and did poorly at the box office. He was next seen alongside Karunas, Shweta Basu Prasad and Sanjana Singh in the 2013 comedy film Chandhamama, before playing a supporting role in the Telugu film, Jai Sriram (2013).[13][14]" - The 13th and 14th reference says nothing about the mentioned sentence. "If it said his role in the movie was not worth it or poor and have a news reference to back it, then that is ok and justifyable and I wont have removed it. But some unrelated and unreferenced content should be removed and cleaned to make way for better content. You are free to add anything from artist point of view in the page like if you find he acted poor in a so called movie in a news, just put it in the page. I have no worries, but unrelated content is unrelated and should not be there in the page. Mischellemougly (talk) 05:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit warring notice is because instead of discussing why your edit was reverted, you proceeded to restore your edit.

You removed "After half a dozen films, he was finally noticed for his performance in the thriller" and added "Harish gained widespread recognition with his performance in the thriller" after removing all his poor films.
You removed Aridhu Aridhu, Sattapadi Kutram, Chandhamama and Guest from his career section, which were all sourced, and left the paragraph with 5 citations for no reason.WP:CITEKILL
Despite winning positive reviews, the film did middling business at the box office. - You removed this line just because it was negative and there is no policy-based reason for this removal. If you are saying the film's performance is unrelated to the actor, then you are just naive. Suitably removing negative reviews and retaining the positive reviews is not allowed, see WP:NPOVHOW, WP:WEIGHT - Generally, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely because it seems biased. Instead, try to rewrite the passage or section to achieve a more neutral tone. And Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those sources.
Did you take time to add the reviews of his performances from the films that you supposedly removed? No. Rather, you removed the sourced content, saying the link is dead - Did you check on the Wayback Machine for the archive? I don't think so.
If we are only going to add the reviews of Harish Kalyan's performances in the career section, then why didn't you remove the other lead artists, producers, and directors' names that are also mentioned?
But some unrelated and unreferenced content should be removed and cleaned to make way for better content - They are related and referenced. He is the lead in the film and you failed to check the Wayback Machine and other reviews because they were negative. We also have enough space in the article, so there is no need to "make way" for more content.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

" Reverting to enforce certain overriding policies is not considered edit warring. For example, under the policy on biographies of living persons, where negative unsourced content is being introduced, the risk of harm is such that removal is required. " - As per edit warring policy 2nd point. Please go through if you are unaware of. I will be removing content without proper reference. If you find any reference for the content you can restore it with new reference added Mischellemougly (talk) 06:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind mentioning which line is unsourced here? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already mentioned those in the first reply Mischellemougly (talk) 07:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critics described his next role in the Thaman-musical Aridhu Aridhu (2010) as "okay",- Source
The film opened to poor reviews and did poorly at the box office. - source
He was next seen alongside Karunas, Shweta Basu Prasad and Sanjana Singh in the 2013 comedy film Chandhamama, before playing a supporting role in the Telugu film, Jai Sriram (2013) - source

Can you mention which other lines are unsourced here? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will start pointing out one by one. Seems you have edited the page even before the discussion is over. but seems a good edit. But let me point out the unreferenced contents

"Upon release, the film met with contrasting reviews, whilst some critics refused to give the film a rating, declaring their disgust at the film's plot.[9][10] " - The reference 9 and 10 put in to support the sentence doesnt even says that some critics refused to give film rating, and from where does the person who added this sentence get the feeling about the contrasting reviews ? The sentence written cannot be backed with the references 9 and 10, so it need to be removed. Mischellemougly (talk) 07:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partly

Done. There are contrasting reviews. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mischellemougly! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Harish Kalyan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Harish Kalyan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one who seems to have problems with the edits in the page, You have reverted the edits twice and you are the one who is primarily engaged in the edit war scenario, I have only reverted once and you are mentioning that I did reverted edits several times?. Get your point correct. Wikipedia is a place of editing in peace and there is no point in simply arguing for no reasons. You can edit, well I can edit and your edit is no better than mine. my edit is no better than yours. I will be making efforts to make pages in wikipedia clean. Mischellemougly (talk) 04:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

7G Films moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 7G Films. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and See WP:ORG / WP:CORPDEPTH. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mischellemougly! Your additions to Girijashankar Sundaresan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mambo Diabolico moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mambo Diabolico. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Supreme Sundar

Please work on this article in draft space to bring it up to the required standard, before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Will work on it to improve the article and submit. I personally felt the article has enough and more sources and info. Moreover I marked it as a stub. But as you suggested I will improve it in draft and submit. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 16:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of the main problems is your poor English. It's worth getting a review so that people can help you rewrite it properly. Deb (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch. It was only a three-sentence article, and I didn’t spot any grammatical errors or issues in that article. However, if you believe there’s a problem, I will certainly review it and work on refining my writing. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Mischellemougly (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 01:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anjana Rajagopalan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anjana Rajagopalan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and WP:UPE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandana Srinivasan (activist) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vandana Srinivasan (activist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and WP:UPE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjith Jayaraman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ranjith Jayaraman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and WP:UPE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Girijashankar Sundaresan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Girijashankar Sundaresan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and WP:UPE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]