User talk:Nrahamthulla

Ask the moderator why did she delete telugu translation page of Clara Zetkin by showing silly reasons. She even edited those pages that contain references and vandalised those references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.114.149 (talk) 16:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Telugu Adikaarabhaasha kaavaalante...pdf listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Telugu Adikaarabhaasha kaavaalante...pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 16:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Humanism in india

A tag has been placed on Humanism in india requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Icewedge (talk) 01:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual intercourse

Hello, Nrahamthulla. You cannot add as much copyrighted text as you did to the Sexual intercourse article or any Wikipedia article. To add information on Islamic views to this article, it is going to have to be more in your own words and better formatted. The way you had it greatly disturbed the formatting of the article, for example. Flyer22 (talk) 07:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sajjah

A tag has been placed on Sajjah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim Ross (talk) 10:35, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual intercourse

I've reverted your edit, as it appears that you've restored an earlier version of the page, deleting much valuable content. Please explain what you want to do and why. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 17:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITS NOT COPYRIGHTED matter.every sentence is supported by a reference from holy scriptures of Islam--Nrahamthulla (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never accused you of putting up copyrighted material. I just think it's inappropriate to delete all the edits that have been made by other people without explanation. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 19:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just adjusted my earlier edits.you have deleted my edits.I never deleted edits of others--Nrahamthulla (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Nrahamthulla! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 350 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tamma Srinivasa Reddy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]