User talk:Osterrich

Welcome!

Hi, Osterrich. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. CapitalSasha ~ talk 19:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Removing!

Hello my name is 82.19.95.171 Im getting fed up of you removing stuff off of every page. If you continue to remove stuff then I will report you. Do I make myself clear? . talk 11:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

If you want your information to stay on display, you'd best get yourself a few sources because right now, I have no obligation to keep unsourced information on the articles. Osterrich ([[User

talk:Osterrich#top|talk]]) 18:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

~~--User:82.19.95.171 (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

I've told you already, and I'll say it again. Provide some sources, and then you can have your info on display. But for now, we'll just remember that Wikipedia is not a web host for irrelevant information. Osterrich (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No because you got no right to remove stuff. I looked on your page and you said got a source don't bother cause it will be removed. This just shows you like to remove every stuff on pages. You shouldnt have bothered coming onto Wikipedia. 82.19.95.171 (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No that's not right. It says this: No source? Don't bother saving it as it will be removed, ok. Osterrich (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well like i said you shouldn't have bothered coming onto Wikipedia and start removing stuff. I am very disapointed with you. 82.19.95.171 (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your revert

You re-added Category:Lepidoptera genera at Proteides. However, I removed it because I was replacing it with the more specific Category:Butterfly genera that is a direct subcategory of Category:Lepidoptera genera. Would you have any objections if I re-remove it? AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:43, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. Yeah go ahead and remove it now it is clear. --Osterrich (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it'd be okay and you'd just overlooked it. Just wanted to make sure the misunderstanding was solved first. Neither of us needs or wants an edit war, I'm sure. Thanks for your quick response.

AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

See WP:LEADCITE. As long as the information is sourced somewhere later on in the article, it's generally okay to have an unref'd lead. Sro23 (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drifters Edit

Just so you know, I didn't mean to remove all the recent edits off the page. I wanted to add something back that another anonymous took off some for reason, and somehow, when I checked the edits, I somehow inadvertently reverted all the previous edits. My apologies, since it wasn't intentional. I don't know how that happened or why.--68.11.91.158 (talk) 20:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]