User talk:Perohanych

For archive see User talk:Perohanych/2007—2020.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Perohanych

Thank you for creating Valerii Makovetskyi.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that other editors have called for more evidence that Mr. Makovetskyi qualifies for a Wikipedia article. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the article. If this matter is not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Doomsdayer520:

Thank you for improving the Valerii Makovetskyi article and for your message.

I will try to find and provide more evidence that Makovetskyi qualifies for a Wikipedia article. Unfortunately it may make me several days, as I am busy with my main job duties. Hope I will be able to address the issue in a week. @Mccapra: --Perohanych (talk) 17:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Valerii Makovetskyi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Valerii Makovetskyi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valerii Makovetskyi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valerii Makovetskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerii Makovetskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych

Hello, Perohanych. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jenyire2 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires more news-related sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jenyire2 19:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perohanych! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jenyire2 19:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi has been accepted

Oleksii Zhmerenetskyi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nosebagbear (talk) 11:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gross gaming revenue

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gross gaming revenue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/gross-gaming-revenue and https://calebci.ruplayers.com/3mig3ZyobKqGnWw/can-you-get-the-new-antidote-xvi-and-cure-krunkitis-krunker.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted this as a copyright violation. To respond to what you said on the talk: "I am not sure that this page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I have used only one sentence — the definition of the subject from one source and three very short sentences from another source. And I have indicated the sources of the mentioned definitions. I am not sure, but as far as I understand, the short citations are allowed, in case the sources are indicated. Please let me know if I am not right." - Even if it is just a sentence or two and the source is cited, the content should not be copied. An exception can be made if the copied content is presented as a quote with a citation, or the content is too basic to be re-worded. I will not block you for this violation as I see it is a misunderstanding but given your history please be mindful not to do this again. If you have any further questions about copyright please ask. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 20:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Moneytrees Thank you for the explanation. On my opinion, the Gross gaming revenue is an important thing to be described on Wikipedia. Is there a place on Wikipedia, where I could ask native English speakers to re-word several sentences? --Perohanych (talk) 21:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Olga Masalitina

Hello, Perohanych. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olga Masalitina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Olga Masalitina

Hello, Perohanych. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Olga Masalitina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alfa-Bank (Ukraine) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alfa-Bank (Ukraine), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 11:14, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych

Hello, Perohanych. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tetiana Cherep-Perohanych".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admin discussion

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Offer_to_"rent"_admin_account An set of people in Kiev trying to rent accounts? Tim Vickers (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like nonsense --Perohanych (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jewish Diplomatic Corps

The article Jewish Diplomatic Corps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organisation, puff piece

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Herman Galushchenko

Hello, Perohanych,

Thank you for creating Herman Galushchenko.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I moved the page to the common spelling of his name in English, German Galuschenko and added another source, you might like to add more biographical detail/content and sources - three would normally be required as a minimum to demonstrate notability, although as a minister of state he would be presumed notable. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Adult School Organisation

The article National Adult School Organisation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This organization appears to lack the coverage needed for a notable organization. Current source is a link to a charity registry. Searching finds mentions on charity directory websites. No in-depth coverage found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gab4gab: I suppose the article is a minimal stub for an important topic, so I have slightly changed the article and renamed it. --Perohanych (talk) 06:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Perohanych, it appears the article title should be 'Adult Schools in United Kingdom' unless the intention is to cover the subject of adult education in the UK. Gab4gab (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gab4gab, AFAIK adult schools in a country are making adult education in the country. Am I right? --Perohanych (talk) 14:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:G7 nations has been nominated for deletion

Category:G7 nations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kvitka Cisyk has been nominated for deletion

Category:Kvitka Cisyk has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kvitka Cisyk soundtracks is also now empty. – Fayenatic London 10:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ABBYY (company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ABBYY (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NP83 (talk) 20:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ABBYY (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ABBYY (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Karol Charity Foundation moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tina Karol Charity Foundation. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and sources about the singer, not her charity; very promo; COI; . Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edit.pdf (talk) 07:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Tina Karol Charity Foundation.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Tina Karol Charity Foundation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalush Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalush. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalush Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrtransgaz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ukrtransgaz. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 09:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mykola Udianskyi

Good evening sir! I saw that you created page Mykola Udianskyi in 2020 and it was removed. Now 2nd nomination after a while. Might you interested to further develop page! Thx for improving Ukraine portal. Antonio Vinzaretti (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruslan Shostak Charitable Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruslan Shostak Charitable Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruslan Shostak Charitable Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DreamlarT (talk) 12:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruslan Shostak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruslan Shostak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruslan Shostak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DreamlarT (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oleg Tolmachev (CEO)

Hello, Perohanych. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oleg Tolmachev (CEO), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oleg Tolmachev (CEO)

Hello, Perohanych. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oleg Tolmachev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Syrskyi-Butcher

Please prove to me and the other Wikipedia editors that Politico, NYT, Washington Post, and other media are unreliable. [1]
[2] [3]
It looks like western media has a consensus that Syrskyi has a nickname - the butcher. And you are trying, under false pretenses, to cancel those edits that show your general in a non-positive color. But this is just my subjective guess. I want your answer to be based on something other than your words. Please back it up with references to what you're relying on.

P. S. MOREOVER! Ukrainian non-neutral media call Syrskyi a butcher. [4]PLATEL (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have to look for a source that Sirsky is not a butcher. Instead, you should cite neutral authoritative sources that he has the nickname butcher.

The list of publications that write about it is not enough. I suggest you read each article, and the specific paragraphs on which the statement that he supposedly has the nickname butcher is based.

You have cited three sources

All those tree sources are not reliable:

Washington Post: is based on an opinion of a noname persons "Some Ukrainian soldiers refer to Syrsky as ..."
Politico: is based on an opinion of a noname person - "a Ukrainian military captain said...", "Another person knowledgeable of Syrskyi’s operations echoed... ", "This person added...".
NYT: is based on gossip "The nickname ... is now widespread in Ukraine’s Army."

--Perohanych (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello Perohanych. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Oleksandr Romanyuk, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Perohanych. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Perohanych|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rosguill, I have never received and do not expect any direct or indirect compensation for my edits to English Wikipedia and have no COI concerning the the article mentioned.

I am not sure about the other editors of the article. But the {{Undisclosed paid}} template casts a shadow of suspicion on all editors of the article, so I don't like it on this page. Can it be replaced by a more precise template?

In addition, I personally consider the person mentioned in the article quite notable — he is very famous in Ukraine, just try to google — there are 1700+ results. --Perohanych (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Terwin (corporation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terwin (corporation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terwin (corporation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oleksandr Komarov (businessman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oleksandr Komarov (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleksandr Komarov (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

鲁纳娄于 (talk) 09:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]