User talk:Redaloes

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Redaloes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 12:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Married and maiden names, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. ~~SIS~~ 19:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Married and maiden names

Redaloes, the edits you keep making to this page are not in keeping with Wikipedia policies. You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not allowed to present it as fact. Please find a citation for your point of view, from a reliable source, as Strikeout_Sister pointed out to you last month. Otherwise you are wasting people's time because we have to keep undoing your edits as long as you are only writing up your opinions. Ricardiana (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:PULI JOODAMU - BOARD.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:PULI JOODAMU - BOARD.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits in Rajus

Hi, Please sign and contribute. It will be more transparent. Appreciate You have added some info on BRK Raju in Rajus wikipage. I doesnt know who this person axactly. Request you to put some references to news links or any other source for justification in BRK Raju wiki page, else it would be treated as some junk page. Also request u to add people who r popular only in the notable rajus list.

Thanks, Indianprithvi (talk) 15:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

File:FourPillarGame.jpg

FourPillarGame

Naalugu Sthambhaalaata (4-pillar game) is a very funny four-player outdoor game played by the children of the past generation, until 1960's and 70's, when joint family system flourished in Andhra Pradesh. Children used to play this game in the houses called Manduva Logillu. These are very beautiful houses constructed with several wooden pillars (made of Rosewood or Teak) and an open space at the center. The game was also played outdoor in open woods. The game had lost its existence owing to the decline of joint families, urbanization, western influence, english education, change in lifestyle etc.

How to play

At the start of the game, the danner is decided after a chain-cut (pantalu). Each of the poles is occupied by a runner (player). The objective of the runners is to shift from one pole to the other with out being captured by the danner; and the objective of the danner is to capture the runners while shifting to the poles. The blue lines indicated in the figure are the movements of the runners.

A runner (say A) leaves his pole and occupies any of the poles of the other only if the runner (say B) of the corresponding pole leaves to another pole.

There are two cases in which A is declared to be out and takes the place of the danner

(I)If A leaves his pole and shifts to a new pole that is occupied by the other runner, the danner quickly touches the pole (that is left by A)

(II)The danner succeedes in capturing A who is about to touch the new pole.

If A becomes the danner, the previous danner becomes the runner and the game is continued as long as bored up.

Speedy deletion nomination of Naalugu sthambhaalaata

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Naalugu sthambhaalaata, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Zhang He (talk) 09:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:NaaluguSthambhaalaata.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:NaaluguSthambhaalaata.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 23:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramudu Sita

The article Ramudu Sita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I Cannot find anything to establish notability or verifiability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 10:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ramudu Sita - game

The article Ramudu Sita - game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, nothing available online about it in English to establish WP:Notability or WP:Verifiability, possible WP:HOAX.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MuffledThud (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Aloe Rubra. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aloe Rubra

The article Aloe Rubra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 09:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

we'd very much like to keep this, if you can give us some source for it. It is not listed in any source I can quickly find, though there is an Aloe rubroviolacea [1], which does not seem to be the same plant at all, judging by the photographs. DGG ( talk ) 05:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hindu Culture - Research

The article Hindu Culture - Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article seems to be entirely original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Miyagawa (talk) 12:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Current-Shock

The article Current-Shock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article cites no sources, my searches indicate this game is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 10:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of London - Game of children

The article London - Game of children has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article cites no sources, my searches indicate this game is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gujjana Goollu

The article Gujjana Goollu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article cites no sources, my searches indicate this game is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hindu Culture - Research

The article Hindu Culture - Research has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lengthy unsourced essay, a WP:SYNTH argument toward a conclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vennela Vatti Aata

The article Vennela Vatti Aata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article cites no sources, my searches indicate this game is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gujjana Goollu

Hi Redaloes, I notices you removed my PROD on Gujjana Goollu. I'm thinking of nominating it for deletion, but I thought I'd drop you a line here first to ask if you could point me to any reliable sources that would show that this game is notable. I've looked and haven't found anything, am I missing something? Thanks-- Glenfarclas (talk) 06:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of London - Game of children

I have nominated London - Game of children, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London - Game of children. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hindu Culture - Facts

The article Hindu Culture - Facts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Opinion essay, completely unsourced WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wine Guy Talk 11:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hindu Culture - Facts. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wine Guy Talk 11:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hindu Culture - Facts

I have nominated Hindu Culture - Facts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu Culture - Facts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Taelus (talk) 12:26, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Current-Shock. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Glenfarclas (talk) 18:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:ToyKitchenSet.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ToyKitchenSet.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Achenagandlu

The article Achenagandlu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources available to prove the facts given about this game. Also, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 07:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Rai

Please do not make incorrect page moves and do not copy over text from one title to another. If you think a move is required, discuss on the article talk page. —SpacemanSpiff 07:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chain Cut

The article Chain Cut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and apparently non-notable. (The article even SAYS that the term isn't found in any dictionary.)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 15:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:TarzanX-ShameOfJane.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:TarzanX-ShameOfJane.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 10:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:KrishnamRaju.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:KrishnamRaju.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 17:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://appsc.ap.nic.in/html/consprov.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tarzan X - Shame of Jane

The article Tarzan X - Shame of Jane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 14:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tarzan X - Shame of Jane, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Tarzan X - Shame of Jane

I have nominated Tarzan X - Shame of Jane, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarzan X - Shame of Jane. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 20:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MerupuDaadiScene1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MerupuDaadiScene1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 08:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MerupuDaadiScene2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MerupuDaadiScene2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Married and maiden names

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Married and maiden names. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SparsityProblem (talk) 16:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MosagallakuMosagadu2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MosagallakuMosagadu2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MosagallakuMosagadu.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MosagallakuMosagadu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MosagallakuMosagadu3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MosagallakuMosagadu3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MerupuDaadiTitle.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MerupuDaadiTitle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GuduGuduGunjam.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GuduGuduGunjam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:VennelaVattiAata.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VennelaVattiAata.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:KrazeLogo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KrazeLogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:KrazeGame2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KrazeGame2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:KrazeGame.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KrazeGame.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:RameshRaju'sLastSupper-1997.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RameshRaju'sLastSupper-1997.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MANDUVA.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:MANDUVA.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — ξ ^xplicit 06:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PuliJoodamu.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PuliJoodamu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Vaikuntapali.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vaikuntapali.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Life Style.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Life Style.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — ξ ^xplicit 06:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Liberation of Israelites.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liberation of Israelites.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 06:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sania Mirza/Malik

Please don't rename pages without prior discussion. Have a look at WP:MOVE regarding the proper procedure. Favonian (talk) 09:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disruptive POV page moves. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 10:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:SuperstarKrishna.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SuperstarKrishna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ ^xplicit 21:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of B.R.K. Raju

The article B.R.K. Raju has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Sodabottle (talk) 06:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 05:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article B.R.K Raju, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cind.amuse 07:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of B.R.K Raju

The article B.R.K Raju has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced BLP. Only references are primary. Subject does not meet WP:PROF or WP:POLITICIAN. Lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources. There are only trivial mentions available in newspapers.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cind.amuse 07:43, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from B.R.K Raju. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cind.amuse 10:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of B.R.K Raju for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B.R.K Raju is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B.R.K Raju until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cind.amuse 10:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of B.R.K Raju

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B.R.K Raju, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cind.amuse 10:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Exodus of Israelites.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Exodus of Israelites.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at 7Seas Entertainment Ltd.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from 7Seas Entertainment Ltd., a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 07:24, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Puli Joodam

An article that you have been involved in editing, Puli Joodam , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Shree (talk) 09:12, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Aloe (Mis-belief)

The article Red Aloe (Mis-belief) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no sources and likely doesn't pass WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. N^oformation ^Talk 06:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red Aloe (Mis-belief) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Aloe (Mis-belief) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Aloe (Mis-belief) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. N^oformation ^Talk 01:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Aloe ferox. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove sourced content that is applicable and fully appropriate for the article N^oformation ^Talk 02:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Eryx johnii, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. N^oformation ^Talk 02:05, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cind.amuse 06:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:B.R.K.Raju.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B.R.K Raju

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of B.R.K Raju, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/articles/b.r.k-raju.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of B.R.K Raju

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B.R.K Raju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —SpacemanSpiff 05:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of B.R.K Raju

A tag has been placed on B.R.K Raju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Cind.amuse 06:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, B.R.K Raju, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cind.amuse 06:13, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sarada Residential School

Please do not add unsourced lists of non-notable people to this article again. Despite your edit summary when re-adding them you have not added WP:reliable sources for each individual - indeed for all but one you have not adde any source - just an occasional Wikilink to the company they work for. The one reference you supplied is not a WP:reliable source. If you cannot find independent coverage of them then they are by definition not notable and should not be listed. noq (talk) 11:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have again reverted your addition of non-notable alumni. You cannot use employee pages, blogs and directory entries as references. Neither can you generally use facebook. Please do not keep adding it back in unless you read and show you understand WP:notability and WP:reliable sources. Just ignoring me will not make the problem go away. noq (talk) 07:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Raju, B.R.K

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Raju, B.R.K, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 10:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 10:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HII

please do ur edits, without changing templates & formats it took lot of time to improve the article - Andhra Pradesh (Dragonbooster4 (talk) 06:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Kshatriya

Hi Redaloes. I've had to keep reverting you on Kshatriya because the information you are adding isn't sourced properly. Per our reliable sources guidelines, neither blogs nor wikis (including Wikipedia) are reliable sources. If you don't have reliable sources for that info, it can't be added.

Also, please note that continually reverting other editors is called edit warring, and isn't allowed. Instead, you need to go discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Additionally, we have a very strict rule called WP:3RR. That says that if you revert the actions of another editor more than 3 times in 24 hours, you will be blocked. Please stop reverting (yes, I know you're adding info, but because it's being done repeatedly, it may be considered reverting), and then come to Talk:Kshatriya and see if we can find a way to get that information sourced properly. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rajus

I have removed your recent addition to the lede section at Rajus. You cannot simply state the Suryvansha lineage in isolation because the article makes it clear that there is more than one lineage. - Sitush (talk) 10:13, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nagamani (Cobra Pearl)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nagamani (Cobra Pearl) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 18:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SaradaResidentialSchoolEmblem.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SaradaResidentialSchoolEmblem.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 18:56, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bhupathiraju

I note that you have been creating a lot of articles on the theme of Rajus, including Bhupathiraju. Many of them have no citations. Please could you spend a little time finding some reliable sources to support the statements that you have made. If you do not then they are probably going to end up being deleted. - Sitush (talk) 08:43, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Red aloe vera. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Claret Ash 11:05, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Mermaid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Thai and Cambodian

Merman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Lotus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Red aloe vera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red aloe vera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red aloe vera until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. N^oformation ^Talk 08:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Red aloe vera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Red aloe vera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Claret Ash 23:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited West Godavari district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Adams Bridge Shoal between India and Srilanka.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Adams Bridge Shoal between India and Srilanka.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Bhupathiraju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tollywood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited BRK Raju, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tamil and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kshatriya, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhanunjaya

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Dhanunjaya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Madhuric (talk) 06:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to User:Redaloes/sandbox. Two basic points about disambig pages: they only link to other Wikipedia articles and they do not SHOUT. Also, in this case, is Dhanunjaya different from Dhananjaya? Or should it be treated in the same way? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rajus

Please do not remove well-sourced and discussed statements as you have recently done at Rajus. You may not be aware that there are sanctions in place for such articles and these pretty much make it necessary for contributors to discuss such sourced statements before removal. I add the template informing you of the sanctions below. - Sitush (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

April 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Raju. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You were also removing sourced content from the article without discussion. Please pay careful attention to the sanctions warning above, and discuss any contested changes on the article Talk page and get a consensus before you try to make them again - further edit-warring to reinstate your changes will most likely result in your being blocked from editing. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeatedly removing sourced content without discussion, as you did at Raju. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Traditional Games of Andhra Pradesh

Some one has deleted or mostly deleted this article. I have gathered information on games by visiting many places and written the description for every game. I want to know why the person has deleted the content for no reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redaloes (talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 April 2012‎

It looks like it has been turned into a stub because there were no sources for any of the games (see the summary in the article history). Wikipedia articles need to be supported by reliable sources, and cannot be based on personal research. If you can find sources that support the descriptions of any of the games, those individual games can be reinstated. I can make a userfied copy of the article for you to work on in your user space, if you would like that. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Boing!, What do you mean by source? A source is any material which is helpful to post another new material. Internet or Wikipedia will not contain any source unless someone like you or me upload it. Infact Internet lacks thousands of sources. For your kind information, this article is not my personal research and I have not written rules of playing games on my own. I took many pains to post this article. So this article will act as a source to whoever post their articles. Still if you do not agree, I will be pleased if you post the sources that you know.

Everything on WP needs to be able to be verifiable by citing a reliable source. See WP:V and WP:RS. SÆdon ^talk 06:26, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. Wikipedia is not intended to be a source of new information itself - as an encyclopedia, it can only summarize information that is already out there in reliable sources. So if you want to develop the article, you will need to find reliable sources that support anything you want to add to it. SÆdon has given you links to the most relevant policy guidelines. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: As I say, if you believe you can find suitable sources for the article, I'll be happy to provide a copy of the earlier version in your userspace for you, so you can work on it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:15, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. When you recently edited Black Turmeric, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gondi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kukkuta.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kukkuta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-English sources

You appear to be using quite a few non-English sources, as at Dhananjaya (gotra) where I have just reverted you. There is nothing wrong with using such sources provided that you are aware of the provisions at WP:NOENG and are prepared to do the necessary work. In India-related articles we are having a quite significant problem due to Indic sources being used that are of uncertain veracity and reliability, and then we find it difficult to check them because the contributor who added the things has become inactive. A lot are effectively self-published sources by caste associations (samitis, mahasabhas etc). Yes, this extra burden is a systemic problem but I really see no other way round it than to ask for more information, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 14:40, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that I have reverted you again at the article. We cannot use other articles on Wikipedia as sources for information - please see WP:CIRCULAR. Nor, for example, is kshatriyas.org a reliable source. One of your other additions was another non-English source, and the items that you added to the external links section were contrary to our attitude regarding such links. - Sitush (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I have had to do it again. I can find nothing to indicate that Buddharaju Varahala Raju is a reliable source and, in fact, he seems not to be widely published or cited etc. - Sitush (talk) 11:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And again, I am afraid. The same issues as previously, and in addition you are not fully citing some of the sources. For example, you should provide details of the publisher, page number etc when citing a book. Taking a look at WP:Citing sources may not be a bad thing. - Sitush (talk) 08:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Kukkuta Sastra.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kukkuta Sastra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 07:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop for a moment

Hi. People are outlining problems to you, above, but you are not responding to them and instead appear to be carrying on doing the same disputed things. We work by collegial interaction here, and if someone disputes the edits you are making, you need to stop and discuss the issues being raised. Continuing to ignore what people are saying to you and carrying on without discussion can lead to blocks, and I don't want that to happen, as I'm sure your intentions here are positive. So please, stop and talk to us, so we can address the issues in a satisfactory manner and move forward. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput

Hi. I've put the Telugu link at Rajput in the correct place, adding te:ఆంధ్ర క్షత్రియులు in the appropriate section at the end, so that it appears in the "Languages" section in the sidebar at the left. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World Organisation of Rajputs

I have yet again removed your insertion of a link to the World Organisation of Rajputs, principally on the grounds of weighting issues. There are numerous Rajput organisations, some of which are affiliated to this body and others that are not. If we show the WOR then we are going to have to permit listing of all the others. Since Wikipedia is neither a directory nor a webhost for promotional content, it is easier to deny all. That way, every group gets a "fair hearing", being no hearing at all. - Sitush (talk) 07:33, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BRK Raju

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BRK Raju, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —SpacemanSpiff 08:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted BRK Raju article which has genuine referrences? wikipedia contains articles about unpopular movie stars and persons too. what about them?

Final warning

This is your final warning for any form of disruption, including but not limited to copyright violations, repeated recreation of articles after they were deleted, original research or POV edits etc. You will be blocked the next time any of this happens as you have received more than sufficient warnings but do not bother to discuss with other editors or correct your behavior. —SpacemanSpiff 08:06, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PapihillsMap.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PapihillsMap.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 09:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:S.obvallata.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:S.obvallata.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 09:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Telugu castes, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 06:52, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeating the same problems that have earned you warnings and a previous block. People have explained the importance of sourcing to you before, yet once again you have added unsourced claims to Wikipedia. This has to stop. Please read WP:RS while you are blocked this time, and have another read of the sanctions warning further up this page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:03, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

I have had to revert you again, this time for these edits at Dhananjaya (gotra). Please can you confirm that you have read WP:RS, and please can you explain why it is that you consider the source that you cited to be appropriate, bearing in mind that policy, the lack of a full citation and WP:NOENG. - Sitush (talk) 12:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing with the same problems. You are not listening to what people are telling you about reliable sources, not learning from you experience, but above all you are not responding to people and are not discussing anything. We can try to solve all of those things, but only if you address the last one yourself - you need to talk to people when your additions are disputed, discuss the issues on the article talk page and seek consensus, and respond when you get messages here on your talk page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kamma (caste), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Raju, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for failing to listen to repeated explanations of the need for proper sourcing for additions to Wikipedia articles, and for other violations of policies. This indefinite block is not necessarily permanent, but will remain in place until you listen to what you are being told and convince us that you do understand it and will act on it. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While blocked, I strongly recommend you read all of the explanations you have been given on this talk page, and read the policy pages that you have been given links to before. In particular, you need to read and understand WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:OR, and WP:COPYVIO - you have been violating these policies repeatedly for around three years now, and it has to stop. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I should also say that a lot of this could have been avoided if you had just responded here and communicated with us - but if you repeatedly ignore us and refuse to partake in any discussion here, then we have no alternative but to stop you editing until you do start communicating. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 03

Dear Boing! I was not trying to violate wiki rules. I was trying to correct the content which was community biased and misdirecting the readers. You may not be knowing this. My content is having genuine referrences. I will be thankful to you if you unblock my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redaloes (talk • contribs) 06:38, 3 August 2012‎

Wikipedia's policy on requiring reliable sources for changes you wish to make is not negotiable, especially if they are in any way contentious. You have a long history here of making changes without providing proper sources, and despite your claim that you provided genuine references, your latest changes to Raju (to choose an example) added lots of new content without providing any references at all. If you wish to be unblocked, you need to follow the instructions in the block notice - but if you want to be successful, you must address your own problematic editing and convince an admin that you properly understand the relevant policies and will abide by them in future. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: When you comment on a talk page, please sign your comment with "~~~~" so we can see who is talking. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"rameshraju 09:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)" This is Redaloes. Please unblock my account. I understood that I should not touch any article written by others.

Redaloes, that doesn't solve the problem at all. First all of, all articles on Wikipedia are open to be written by anyone. Starting an article doesn't give anyone control over it. Second, even on an article you create yourself, the requirements for verification of sources are still in effect. All of the rules we've been referring you to apply everywhere in Wikipedia. It seems to me that you haven't taken the time to actually read any of those rules. Please do so. If you're willing to commit to following them, then perhaps an unblock could be considered. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redaloes, you have been breaking a number of Wikipedia policies repeatedly for quite some time now, and your request here suggests that you still do not understand what the problems are. What I think you should do, at the very least, is give us an explanation of what you understand Wikipedia's WP:N and WP:RS policies to mean, as they seem to be the ones giving you the most problems. I'm not sure if that would be enough for an unblock, but it would be a start - and I think it is what we would need as a minimum. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear sir ... please tell me how to produce referrences, in two to three lines, in simplest language. I could not understand sentence complexity of wikipedia rules. If not I cannot contribute any article for English Wikipedia, and I'll be quitting perminently.

Hi, I think that before worrying about how to produce citations, you need to address the issues raised by Boing! said Zebedee, ie: "at the very least, [...] give us an explanation of what you understand Wikipedia's WP:N and WP:RS policies to mean, as they seem to be the ones giving you the most problems." No-one wants to see people leave Wikipedia but there are limits to what can be tolerated. Demonstrating that you can read and understand our policies is as basic a starting point as anyone can reasonably expect. Best wishes. - Sitush (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:A scene in Rangapuram Khandrika.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:18, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Black Turmeric 3.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:BlackTurmericPowder.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhupathiraju

The article Bhupathiraju has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Just another Indian surname.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhupathiraju for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhupathiraju is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhupathiraju until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 03:52, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission

The article Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This commission appears to be in charge of personnel for state jobs in AP (which you have to read halfway through the article to find out in a one-liner). Mostly, as written, it's a legislative history of the body, with minutia about which laws govern it. There does not seem to be anything useful or encyclopedic about this "article" on just another government agency, any more than the literally millions of other state and local government agencies in the world for which we have no articles.

Google News has only two hits for it and, while Google Books shows 1500 hits, most seem to be periodic reports from itself or other Indian government agencies. While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 11:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goleelu

The article Goleelu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Purely Invented. The word Goleelu means Marbles, for which the page already exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vin09 (talk) 06:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kukkuta Sastra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kukkuta Sastra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kukkuta Sastra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merupu Daadi

The article Merupu Daadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, tagged since 2019. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:AnimatedFloweringPlant.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:AnimatedFloweringPlant.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]