User talk:SKCOTT

This is SKCOTT's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Gary Hutton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gary Hutton. Thanks! Bearcat (talk) 12:12, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that categories are not allowed to be added to pages while they're still in draftspace. If and when the draft is accepted, then the page will have appropriate categories added to it at that time, but as long as it's still in draft form it is not allowed to already be filed in any articlespace categories as if it were already a completed article. Bearcat (talk) 12:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I get that you're new, which is why I'm letting you know about how our rules actually work. Everybody here (even me) was new once, and had to learn some of the intricacies of how we do things, so it doesn't make you a bad person. Bearcat (talk) 13:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated, Bearcat. Thank you. SKCOTT (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Takeaway No. 1: Don't add categorise while its in draftsapce. Thank you, Bearcat! <3 SKCOTT (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. We made the mistake of referencing the photo from an article rather than in the Wikipedia Commons. Here is the relevant page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gary_Hutton_Portrait.jpg

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Hutton (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also see the notability guidelines for artists.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Hutton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SKCOTT! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Hutton (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sadly, most of these citations are not independent of the subject, so they don't accomplish notability. This subject fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:NARTIST. We need proof that his work in in permanent collections in notable museums. The awards won aren't notable, so they don't help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Hutton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chris Troutman,

Thank you for the opportunity to resubmit.

Clarification: Gary Hutton is an interior designer who trained as a fine artist. His main notability and press/media coverage are for interior design. That is likely WP: creative or possibly WP: architect.

His work has been published by notable magazines in every one of the 40 years of his career. We’ve added three best sources that establish notability per the guidelines.

One of your colleagues turned down the submission before we had time to respond to your questions.

Re-stated/resupplied here:

1. This is a recent San Francisco penthouse covered by "Interiors", the leading magazine for interior design professionals: https://www.interiorsdigital.com/interiors/_october_november_2020_/MobilePagedReplica.action?pm=1&folio=62#pg63

2. Gary's book "Art House"-is a best-selling book about his work for a single client. Published by Assouline, the book reprinted in 2017, 2019 and 2021: https://www.assouline.com/products/art-house

3. Architectural Digest, the leading interior design consumer magazine https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/chara-schreyers-los-angeles-home This house was republished later in 2019 Phaidon – "Interiors: The Greatest Rooms of the Century"

References Added:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Gary_Hutton&action=submit SKCOTT (talk) 11:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chris,

The changes reflecting the clarifications have just been published. Apologies, I'm still getting a hang of Wikipedia ins and outs. Please have a look and let me know what you think. SKCOTT (talk) 15:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Hutton (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Hutton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Walekum Chunky Bhai,

Both of our Wikipedia Tales have commonalities: Writing out of interest, learning on the go and using guidance to improvise. The Wikipedia for Gary Hutton started out to spotlight his creative work globally. I started with 24 references to 15 then to 3. Could you guide me to have my first Wikipedia Approved? I'm a quick study. We could connect vai email/ Whatsapp? SKCOTT (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Out of the 24 references (3 now) I started with for AfC: Gary Hutton, how do I know which ones establish notability and do what they're supposed to do? Adopt and guide me, perhaps? SKCOTT (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chunky,

Clarification: Gary Hutton is an interior designer who trained as a fine artist. His main notability and press/media coverage are for interior design. That is likely WP: creative or possibly WP: architect.

His work has been published by notable magazines in every one of the 40 years of his career. We’ve added three best sources that establish notability per the guidelines.

One of your colleagues turned down the submission before we had time to respond to your questions.

Re-stated/resupplied here:

1. This is a recent San Francisco penthouse covered by "Interiors", the leading magazine for interior design professionals: https://www.interiorsdigital.com/interiors/_october_november_2020_/MobilePagedReplica.action?pm=1&folio=62#pg63

2. Gary's book "Art House"-is a best-selling book about his work for a single client. Published by Assouline, the book reprinted in 2017, 2019 and 2021: https://www.assouline.com/products/art-house

3. Architectural Digest, the leading interior design consumer magazine https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/chara-schreyers-los-angeles-home This house was republished later in 2019 Phaidon – "Interiors: The Greatest Rooms of the Century"

References Added:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Gary_Hutton&action=submit

SKCOTT (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help: Draft for Gary Hutton

Hi @Chunky aka Al Kashmiri. Salam Walekum. Out of the 30 references (3 now) I started with for AfC: Gary Hutton, how do I know which ones establish notability and do whagt they're supposed to do? Adopt and guide me, perhaps? SKCOTT (talk) 08:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Hutton (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:NARTIST?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Hutton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gary Hutton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gary Hutton. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello SKCOTT. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SKCOTT. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SKCOTT|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 17:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gary Hutton

Hello, SKCOTT. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gary Hutton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gary Hutton

Hello, SKCOTT. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gary Hutton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]