User talk:Shevonsilva

Your emails to me

I will not reply for reasons of transparency. You said nothing different than what you've already said about why they should be created or exist.

Again, this is first about the community objecting to the mass-creation. That is what we want you to acknowledge and discuss. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Privacy

Hi, while it's your choice as I presume an adult, I suggest you consider carefully the implications of posting your private information like address and phone number in such a public place where it will be indexed by search engines and may be copied by mirrors which you will have little control over and may keep the info long after you have removed it. See also Wikipedia:User pages#Personal and privacy-breaching material. If someone has already mention this to you, sorry about bringing it up again, but given the large number of discussions and the fact you delete them, it's difficult for me to see. Nil Einne (talk) 17:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Ethiopian units of measurement) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ethiopian units of measurement, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi - nice work. I'll tag it for further copy-editing, but thank you for contributing to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Any time :). It's always fascinating to learn about new things like this. LouiseS1979 (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your new articles

They are weigh better and immeasurably more valuable. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

More emails to me

Again, I will not reply to such emails. For transparency, it is best to discuss things here. Thank you for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Sri Lankan units of measurement

Is There any update about Riyana, is it used to measure area or length, what is the comparison, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.135.93.87 (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@112.135.93.87 I will try to include about Riyana later. Thanks. :) Shevonsilva (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

General point about English

@Imaginatorium Thanks. :) It was mentioned as British units in very old source. I did not see the word Imperial units in the era mentioned in the article. Anyway, will it be better to convert it to current usage, or, keep a link to the current article by using the old name? what is your idea?

As I said, if you link to an article called imperial units it is better to call it "imperial units". Same for metric system. And probably more. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium Actually, I was referring the times before 1824 also when the term imperial units was not defined and not available. I do not feel it will make sense of referring it by the name imperial units as I was referring full systems of British units, where basic units had been available from long time. what are your thoughts about to improve the article in a perfect manner? Shevonsilva (talk) 18:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The note at the top of our Imperial units article helpfully points to English units for the period before 1824. Other names have been proposed and tried, but that is the one which has achieved consensus and remained stable. NebY (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

@NebY Thanks. :-) The sources mentioned the word British as it had included Scottish, English and Welsh too. I am a bit reluctant to reduce the meaning to English only without having proper sources. do you two have any other proper way to overcome the issue in an un-doughtfull manner? Shevonsilva (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

On examining that sentence in Sri Lankan units of measurement rather than simply responding to the above discussion, I fear that uncritical use of the source has produced an absurd result. Sri Lanka, according to our own article, "has a documented history that spans over 3,000 years"; it came under British control in the early 19th century, only just before the 1824 Act that introduced imperial units. Do you find it credible that "Generally British measures of length and surface were used" in the preceding 2800+ years? Do you think that Sri Lanka persisted in using pre-1824 units after the introduction of imperial units? When were those units listed under Sri Lankan units of measurement#Pre-metric Units used - before, after or during British control? NebY (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

@NebY Hi, I basically provided that sentence based on the sources I had. Shevonsilva (talk) 20:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Courtesy on talk pages

It is conventional to leave discussions on talk pages, not to keep deleting them. People are trying to help you -- if you keep deleting these comments, other people will end up making the same comments again. If you want to be regarded as a normal cooperative editor, please stop deleting. Thanks! Imaginatorium (talk) 06:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium Oh dear, I am going to have a long talk page. :)  :). Thanks, Imaginatorium. Shevonsilva (talk) 06:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

You might want to take a look at WP:ARCHIVE and User:Lowercase sigmabot III too. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry about a long talk page: one of the most respected editors around (highest approval votes in recent Arbcom election) has an absurdly long talk page - see User talk:DGG. There are also ways to set up automatic archiving so that posts on your talk page are tidied away to a series of archive files automatically, after a specific period of inactivity of a thread. My user talk page shows one way of doing it; there are others. PamD 06:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Kikichugirl @PamD: Thanks. Appreciate it. :)  :) I am a bit worried about random negative comments in my talk page. Will it be an issue for me? Shevonsilva (talk) 07:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Responding to justified negative comments by taking note and improving your editing will only reflect well on you. It's learning to edit. Leaving PROD notices etc visible on your page helps other editors to see what editing experiences you've been having and helps them to help you. PamD 08:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Statohm) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Statohm, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Legacypac just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

redirected

To reply, leave a comment on Legacypac's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Statmho) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Statmho, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Legacypac just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

merged and redirected

To reply, leave a comment on Legacypac's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

You have been editing this again, and removed the "dubious" tag with the reason: "...unlikely statmho was ever defined to that many decimals and does not agree with modern value of c". How did you decide how many significant figures were appropriate, and what does this have to do with the value of c? Imaginatorium (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Argentine units of measurement

The original version of this page (which you wrote) includes a paragraph Argentine units of measurement#Units after Metric Adoption. I made a note about this on the talk page: I really cannot understand what it means. Can you please explain? Thanks. Imaginatorium (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium Thank you for the enquiry. :) It means about the units after metric adoption (i.e. Units which were or are using after the time of the metric adoption.) There, specifically consider the continues usage of previous system of units even after the metrication, and mis-interpreted usage of names of the units. Shevonsilva (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I understand the title, "Units after metric adoption". I don't understand the text of the paragraph. Here is a breakdown of the first sentence:

[Old units] ... were still used by mixing the values of the Spanish terms of metric and English units (e.g. vara for meter)

This says that the Spanish terms for "metric and English" units were mixed. What does "English" mean here? Is 'vara' a "metric" unit or an "English" unit? If it is English, why does it seem to be in Spanish?

... by showing the requirement to avoid mixing of terms in old system and metric system and English system.

Above you said they were mixed, but this part of the sentence seems to say they were not mixed. And this time there are three systems of units?

This led to a mixed system of units after adoption of the metric system.

Perhaps this sentence can be deleted, since it doesn't seem to say anything. If you cannot explain what these statements mean, can you tell us the original text on which they are based. Thanks. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium Thank for your enquiry.  :)

[Old units] ... were still used by mixing the values of the Spanish terms of metric and English units (e.g. vara for meter)

E.g. vara was used as meter even though the defined value of meter was different. Source provided the word "English" (it might refer to Imperial or American system.) (In old sources the world "English units" were common)

... by showing the requirement to avoid mixing of terms in old system and metric system and English system.

Oh dear, In 1920s, there was a requirement to stop mixing of terms (e.g: vara for meter) in old system and metric system and English system.

This led to a mixed system of units after adoption of the metric system.

Yes, Even in 1920s, there was still mixed system of units as a result. (e.g. vara and meter (as same, or, as two units) was still used).

Hope you understand what the sentence implies. I am always ready to answer any doubts. :) Thank you for the inquiry. (oooops, the source provided a long description about this matter. :) (This sentence provided an idea about the usage of units in 1920s.) Shevonsilva (talk) 08:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

No, you have not explained at all. The paragraph still makes no sense; please do not remove "Confused" tags until at least one native English speaker has agreed that it makes sense.

You say that "old sources" often use the words(?) "English unit" -- yes, but what did they mean by it? If they mean "miles and feet etc" (there is no need to add a note saying this), then unless you explain that "miles and feet etc" were used in Argentina it makes no sense. There are other problems: you have copied two different sets of units out of two books. How do you explain that one has names in German, the other names in Spanish?

I will add some tags to the page indicating that there are problems. Please do not remove them until the problems are resolved, and the page is understandable. Imaginatorium (talk) 14:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium This paragraph is specially needed. It informs the confusion of unit names of different systems after metrication. Please re-study the paragraph. Finding the meaning of "English unit" is not a main task and it is not a confusion factor. It simply means any English unit (same name as Spanish unit). I disagree with the fact that adding the confusion tag based on only one sentence. Thanks. :) 16:48, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium I still cannot imagine why cannot get the meaning of that particular sentence?  :) Shevonsilva (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

The reason you can't understand why I can't understand it is that I understand English vastly better than you do. So please stop inviting me to "study" a sentence that makes no sense. To start at the beginning, you have:

Spanish terms of metric and English units (e.g. vara for meter)

This is not quite grammatical. Perhaps you mean:

Spanish names for metric and English units (e.g. vara for meter)

But vara is a Spanish unit and 'metre/meter' is a metric unit. So what does "English" refer to here. Start with this bit, then we can try the rest of the sentence. Imaginatorium (talk) 04:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium The word, term, will be the better word rather than using general words like names (which can also imply something like people names). "Vara for meter" is an example only to understand it in a better way (I included it after your inquiry). So, as e.g. suggests, there must be similar examples for English units too. There is no need to provide all the examples to cover whole domain by constructing a paragraph which will jeopardise the intended meaning. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

No, "name" is correct. No, your idea about "implying people's names" is wrong. So "Vara for metre" is an example: OK, what is it an example of? I think it is an example of a Spanish unit name being used to refer to a metric unit. How can "English units" have anything to do with this? What would a "similar example" be an example of? Anyway, I am still trying to find out what this means:

Spanish names for metric and English units (e.g. vara for meter)

Do you want to have another try? What English units is this talking about? The paragraph is so confused, that unless you can come up with a coherent explanation soon, I will just delete it all. Imaginatorium (talk) 15:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium How do you say the idea "implying people's names" is wrong? The word "name" is much more general word. There is no need to provide all the possible examples for every possibilities which can be derived from a sentence as the reader can understand it, and as I have provided the references. What is the problem with you specially regarding the word "English"? It is clear any reader can understand what it meant. 07:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

<pedantry>And e.g. is always followed by a comma.</pedantry> Lesser Cartographies (talk) 04:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes. Thanks. :) , or, and also by a colon too. 13:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

There are similar problems with Cuban units of measurement. The sentence "As in 1920s too, other units from system other than Metric System, including old Spanish, American, and local, were also used." is confusing and poorly written. Please clarify what you mean. Please also note that when a source is available online it's a courtesy to readers to include the URL in the reference, so that they can verify the source you've used- two of your refs in this article are freely available online, and I've added the link, but please do so yourself in future. And there's something very odd about the Cuban "legua", though I've noted that in the article. Thanks. PamD 23:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

@PamD Grammatically it gives the correct meaning. Anyway, I re-arranged the wording of the sentence in order to understand it by all level of users. Thanks. That is very nice that you have improved the article by extending meaning of legua by adding the deviation from the general meaning. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Costa Rican units of measurement

added a link pointing to Salvador

Honduran units of measurement

added a link pointing to Salvador

Nicaraguan units of measurement

added a link pointing to Salvador

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Linking sources

Of course it is quite OK to use real books as references for Wikipedia articles. But it is also helpful to readers and other editors to provide a link to an online copy if one is available, especially when it is free to use. I have suggested this to you, and I added the link to ICT in Cuban units of measurement. I wonder why you are not doing this in your new stubs, such as Cypriot units of measurement? Have you got a particular reason? Please explain. It seems to me to be an obvious enhancement of an article, but presumably you have some reason not to do so. PamD 09:10, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

I've linked it in Cypriot. PamD 09:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

@PamD. Actually it is a good idea. But the issue is if the link is broken in future, it will provide a kind of non-professional view for the article (reliability of the link is the issue I am basically concerning). Shevonsilva (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Nothing on the internet is guaranteed to last forever, but that doesn't prevent us from adding links. The important thing in the case of Googlebooks etc is to create a reference to the book, complete with publisher, page, etc, and then add the URL as an added bonus. That way, if the link fails or is even temporarily offline we still have a perfectly adequate reference. The wrong thing to do is to treat Googlebooks as a website, and just make a link to the content in question, without giving the bibliographic information (and there are far too many editors who do just that). As long as the full bibliographic reference is provided, there is nothing to lose and much to gain by adding the URL to link to Googlebooks or wherever else the text can be found. If at some future time the link breaks, someone will label it "dead link", someone else may well find an archived copy, but no-one will think the worse of you or the article for it. So please provide a link where you have it: it makes it much easier for readers or other editors to verify the source of the content. Thanks. PamD 16:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

I see I haven't convinced you. Do you really have the reader's interests at heart? Why not make it easier for them to verify the source of your information? PamD 16:46, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm still puzzled as to why you are reluctant to help the readers of your articles by providing an online link to your source. I have reassured you, above, that we need not worry about the possibility of the Googlebooks link becoming broken. Are you interested in helping readers, or merely in creating as many articles as possible for some personal reason? I have upgraded the references to ICT in several of your articles just now, but I'm not really that interested in obsolete units - just in trying to produce a better encyclopedia. Please at least add the link to new articles you create. PamD 23:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Czech units of measurement) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Czech units of measurement, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi Shevonsilva - I've copy-edited your article, but thank you very much for another interesting piece of work. It is definitely appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Estonian units of measurement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livonian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Greek units of measurement) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Greek units of measurement, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Lstanley1979 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Another great contribution. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Lstanley1979's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Italian measurements page

Shevonsilva, just a few comments on Wikipedia and English style for you, so you can polish your future articles further.

• When you want to reference another article in a 'See also' tag, use the {{See also|article title here}} template, which gives the uniform look to it.

• In section headings, only capitalise the first word and proper nouns (such as the names of people and cities). Lists of substances should read e.g. 'Gold, silver, bronze, pewter, tin' rather than 'Gold, Silver, Bronze, Pewter, Tin'.

• Probably better English style to use the word 'Distance' rather than 'Road measurements'. Also, if you're talking about the name of a city or province, the current style is 'in Rome', 'in Ancona', etc. I gather you're using a 19th century source, which means that the English in that source will be antiquated ('at Ancona' is sometimes found in older forms of English, but that usage has generally died out unless you're talking about an edge case like the name of a battle, e.g. 'at [the battle of] Waterloo'). Just quickly revise modern English style so you don't keep getting corrected.

• Only wikilink something the first time it appears in the article (e.g. a city name or a unit of measurement such as litres).

• You don't need spaces in front of certain measurements. If you want an indented list, use bullet points.

• You also don't need to repeat 'In Ancona, several different measurements were used' - it's obvious from the section title. Put the references after what you're referring to, not at the head of a section.

Just following some of the guidelines will reduce the amount of copy-editing your articles need. I'm happy to take a look, but it's down to you to generally get the style right. LouiseS1979 ^(pigeonhole) 12:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Also, probably not good to have your mobile number on public display on your userpage. LouiseS1979 ^(pigeonhole) 13:07, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Seam (unit) etc

This came before my eyes while I was stub-sorting, and I have expanded it from the original version. In doing this I found very useful the {{convert}} template (which adjusts the number of significant figures to a sensible value in its calculations), and the information at Help:Convert units and Module:Convert/documentation/conversion data/doc (for full list of unit names handled by "Convert"), so that I could quote different definitions and relate them all to Litres and kg for comparison. (I'm saying this here partly for the benefit of other editors who might have watchlisted this page because they have taken an interest in the collection of articles on units which you have created, because they may find these resources useful). PamD 15:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Point (unit)

Before you created this article (this version), did you look at the disambiguation page at Point? The section Point#Measurement_units makes it clear that "point" has been used for several different measures over time and place. The article Point (typography) is probably the most common current use, and it explains that "point" in this sense has had various different definitions over time and is currently in use to mean 1/72 inch (twice the size of the unit Cardarelli describes). Do you think the reader would be better served by the stub you created, with its bald, unusual, definition of 1/144 inch and its frankly absurd conversions to tens of decimal places? Please explain your thinking here.

I have converted the stub to redirect to the section of the disambiguation page. PamD 08:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Shevonsilva,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list • Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter • Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:I2, Mansfiled.png

Thanks for uploading File:I2, Mansfiled.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I2, Mansfiled.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I2, Mansfiled.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Composite entity pattern sequence diagram.png

Thanks for uploading File:Composite entity pattern sequence diagram.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Salmarazd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salmarazd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salmarazd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imaginatorium (talk) 06:57, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Blackboad pattern system structure.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blackboad pattern system structure.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shevonsilva. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shevonsilva. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Graduate Prospects

The article Graduate Prospects has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not separately notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 18:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I have modified and addressed the misleading descriptions of the article. I also placed a small description in the talk page too.Shevonsilva

Proposed deletion of Prospects Luminate

The article Prospects Luminate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability requirements. Non-notable service of group that is itself of unclear notability. No coverage beyond mentions and Twitter found via Google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, yaaa, I too think, still less notable, hard for me too, to find information.Shevonsilva

Nomination of Chicurnu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chicurnu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicurnu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

@Power~enwiki Sorry, I renamed it correctly:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicuma. The town is in in https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Chicuma,+Angola/@-13.4292739,14.8368504,13126m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x1bba1848f8d1d357:0xf350ef5c8da5c702!8m2!3d-13.42936!4d14.87187.

Kindly goole it. I got 68,400 search results for https://www.google.com/search?q=Chicuma+angola&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab.

Actually I removed the deletion notice as this is a clear misunderstanding and to save time. :)

Thanks for catching it. Portugese to English naming is a bit flacky. Shevonsilva

Umpulo

Your source says "a village", certainly not a city.Xx236 (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@Xx236 I think they do not have a seperate tag for commune and it is marked as a village. User:Shevonsilva

And please find better references for these many populated places in Angola, and check carefully that there is not already an article at a different spelling. One well-referenced stub is better than a handful of stubs only sourced to maps. Thanks. PamD 07:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@PamD Thanks for concerns. Commune can be either city, suburb, village, or, other (cities and villages are not cleary define in some cases). It is a fact Umpulo is a city and commune; actually we really do not need references for that. Spelling for these places are varying in English as these spelling are from either Portugese or French language; yet English language has to enstablish standard English spelling. User:Shevonsilva

No, you are wrong; we do need a reference for the existence of Umpulo and its status as a city, village, etc. Maps are not enough. And if there are variants in English spellings, please make sure that there are redirects, hatnotes or disambiguation page entries from the variations - that way we avoid people creating duplicate articles at different spellings, as you did twice. Please provide proper references and take more care. Thanks. (And if you want to send a "ping" to attract someone's attention to a post, you need to type {{ping|PamD}}, not just @PamD). PamD 16:33, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@PamD This is a bit rude. We don't need references for those: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essex, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essex, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridgeshire, and much more (If you live in Angola, it will be a fact, and, wikipedia is a worldwide project; because you do live in UK, you need references.). You can simply google it. The way you are replying me is a bit rude. I don't like to ping, some people don't like it. We need references for further description. Anyway, it can be argued in both ways. References I have provided are more than enough, as I believe (I do not really have to), than, providing newspaper articles. Try to understand, I am doing hard work here. Try to motivate me instead de-motivating me. I do not like to argue with you. You too are too doing a good service for the world through wikipedia. User:Shevonsilva

Actually we can reliably see the place: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Umpulo,+Angola/@-12.7073046,17.6911805,521a,35y,39t/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x1bc8bd9ff4b6c7c7:0x3d0e2883cfae6647!8m2!3d-12.70244!4d17.69227, which is used in Google Satalite Navigater too, making much reliability of the location. User:Shevonsilva

The Cambridgeshire article uses as a reference an article from Encyclopedia Britannica which states that it is a county - I don't see what point you were trying to make by using it as an example above. The article you started as Kassumbe had two links to maps showing a location called "Cassumbe". No evidence for the alternative name. No evidence of what sort of a place it is. No evidence that it is a commune. (It is included in the unsourced list at Communes of Angola, but that is not a valid reference). You have not supplied any evidence for the existence of a place called "Kassumbe", and the evidence for "Cassumbe" shows that a place of some sort exists there but nothing more. Information added to this encyclopedia needs to be reliably sourced: maps and satellite images are not enough. PamD 21:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Points omitted: Essex: "Essex /ˈɛsɪks/ is a county in the East of England. Immediately north-east of London, it is one of the home counties. It borders the counties of Suffolk and Cambridgeshire to the north, Hertfordshire to the west, Kent across the estuary of the River Thames to the south, and London to the south-west. The county town is Chelmsford, which is the only city in the county.", which has no references (do not need). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlow: Harlow is a former Mark One New Town and local government district in the west of Essex, England. Situated on the border with Hertfordshire, it occupies a large area of land on the south bank of the upper Stort Valley, which has been made navigable through other towns and features a canal section near its watermill. Old Harlow is a village-size suburb founded by the early medieval age and most of its high street buildings are early Victorian and residential, mostly protected by one of the Conservation Areas in the district. In Old Harlow is a field named Harlowbury, a de-settled monastic area which has the remains of a chapel, a scheduled ancient monument., has no references (the first sentance does not need references). Cambridgeshire: is an East Anglian county in England, bordering Lincolnshire to the north, Norfolk to the north-east, Suffolk to the east, Essex and Hertfordshire to the south, and Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire to the west., does not have references (I am talking about the rest of the sentance, not the name changes). Those are my points. We should not have to provide references for facts. User:Shevonsilva

We do have to provide references for facts: that's one of the pillars of the encyclopedia. If you think another article needs better references, then you can add {{cn}} (short for {{citation needed}}. Meanwhile please give references to Reliable Sources which confirm the information you add to the encyclopedia. Thanks. PamD 22:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes PamD I added it once for different article, in case of doubt about the content which cannot be easily validated. It is really nice to talk to you anyway. Thanks much. User:Shevonsilva

Thanks for moving Kassumbe to Cassumbe. I am not sure that is the correct English pronounciation or not (Cassumbe). It is fine as Kassumbe is in portugese and some other references it is used as Cassumbe as it is in French (Readers can understand the variations). As I mentioned earlier correct spelling for it yet to be established in English (and, I want to hightlight it to the readers too, until correct spellings are established.). It is upto the community of Wikipedia too. I think I have sufficiantly explained it. It is really nice to talk to you anyway. Thanks much. User:Shevonsilva

• Well done for finding the census database and adding references like this one which verifies that Tando Zinze is a commune in Cabinda Province. That's the sort of thing which is needed. Thanks.

I was lucky with Angola and it is in Portugese: I do not speak Portugese :). If I cannot find, no option. Anyway, thanks, because of your wording, I gave further attention even though I still hold my point it as a fact. :) User:Shevonsilva

A suggestion: As you are creating so many stub articles on places, could you perhaps add the appropriate stub tag, to save other editors from doing so (one adding {{stub}} and then one like me stub-sorting it)? For Angola it's just {{Angola-geo-stub}} (added right at the bottom of the article): for other countries there are sometimes stubs for province or other subdivision levels, which are easy enough to find if you look at Category:Brazil geography stubs or whatever. Thanks. PamD 07:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, yaa, I too saw it. Trying to expand it soon, or, have to mark it as stub article.User:Shevonsilva

Orphaned non-free image File:Graduate Prospects logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Graduate Prospects logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Have you considered...

1. Have you considered using importScript('User:Ais523/stubtagtab2.js'); as part of your common.js? I always hated doing anything with stubs since finding the right one was difficult. That script makes going through the directory manageable (though can be slow given amount of data at times).

2. Have you considered requesting the autopatrolled permission? You seem to meet the general criteria and this could be helpful in reducing the WP:NPP backlog the next time you find some good census information for cities not on Wikipeida.

If you have questions or wish to discuss either of these don't hesitate to ping me here or leave a comment on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I will go through this later. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Wrong kind of commune

The infobox for Cutenda has a link to the wrong use of "commune", although in the lead sentence you've linked it correctly. Please go back and correct this for all the other articles where the infobox link is wrong, before you create any more articles. Thanks. PamD 07:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Good catch.  I changed some of them.  Hope this will not be a significant effect on existing articles. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Stubs

While creating all these stub articles, please add {{Angola-geo-stub}} as you go along, to save other editors having to label them as stubs and then stub-sort them.

It would also be useful to add {{coord missing|Angola}}, so that it will go into a category to attract editors who like to go around adding coordinates data to articles.

But you need to sort out your Communes of Angola which aren't Communes, first of all, please. PamD 10:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Good suggestion. Hi, all of them are communes. Cities also have a commune with the same name and also be a commune. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

The word "commune" is used in several different ways, but commune links to an article about a group of people living together with shared property etc. In any one country "commune" may have a meaning as an administrative unit. Then there was the Paris Commune (French Revolution), etc etc. Your infoboxes were linking to the wrong kind of commune, although in the text you sensibly linked them as [[Communes of Angola|commune]]. I don't really see what you're trying to say in your comment above. PamD 18:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Ooooops, I thought you were talking about the articles. Sorry. Yes, commune is a Commune (refer the first refence of the article). You are right. I don't feel a big urgency for the changes even though it is required. I think Commune article has to be modified to apply more weight in administration too. Description is more like a dictionary description rather than Encyclopedic. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

I have amended the hatnote at Commune to make it clearer. PamD 20:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks much Pam. Shevonsilva (talk) 21:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Graduate Prospects logo.png

A tag has been placed on File:Graduate Prospects logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Shevonsilva (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prospects Luminate logo 2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prospects Luminate logo 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, this should be deleted. Shevonsilva (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Please STOP

You have created a very large number of articles on Angolan communities that are essentially the same. They all reference the same census data on Viana. For example: Mangue Grande refers to Viana. Please fix your citations. Thanks, Vexations (talk) 23:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vexations I think what you mean by "Angolan communities that are essentially the same" is with related to reference error, as these are different communities. Thanks for catching it as the site was down at the time I was creating the article. Yap, I fixed it. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 00:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

I meant that the articles are all the same in that they all cites the same source (the census data for Viana). It looks like you've been using a template and forgot to update the link to the census data. Vexations (talk) 01:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Actually I saw it and the site was down and I was targeting the home page at that time and updated the title. That was an error that it was directing to Viana. I appreciate that finding it. If you have a free time, join to improve the article Communes_of_Angola as I was utterly tired of that page, and, it was badly constructed yet, and, incorrect spelling with Portugese wordings, and, it was a big pain for me to insert "Citation Needed" tags (and to find those too). Thanks Vexations Shevonsilva (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Cuilo-Futa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cuilo-Futa, refers to census data about another community, Viana. Please fix that. Vexations (talk) 23:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vexations yap, that was an error. I fixed it, and, moved the draft back to normal article. Thanks. 00:47, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

African stubs

Nice job with your article creations! Population-based areas are always good to have on the encyclopedia, especially for a continent like Africa where not a lot is documented on here. The only thing I noticed going through is that sometimes you forgot to remove the page creation templates (for example: This section is empty, insufficiently detailed or incomplete. Your help [archive] is welcome! How to do ?) and the other problem I saw is with spacing. Either too many spaces before a period or comma, or a space before the reference starts. I went through your most recent articles and think I fixed all those problems, just something to keep in mind going forward! :) SEMMENDINGER (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Semmendinger Thanks Semmendinger Shevonsilva (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Mahagi Territory) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mahagi Territory, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your references are a mess in this article and are loaded with unknown parameters - please sort them out.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes Yap. Thanks. Fixed it. Shevonsilva (talk) 21:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Kasha (commune)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kasha (commune), Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please include wikilinks to places like Lake Kivu and Bukavu

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes Thanks, if reviewers too can cure the pages too, it would be nice too. Thanks for catching the links Shevonsilva (talk) 22:44, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Kazamba) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kazamba, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please include a wikilink to the city of Kikwit. Your rapidly-created articles are weakened by your failure to link to useful elements within them, which is a shame

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 21:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes Thanks, Nick. I really expect reviewer can too join my effort to improve the encyclopedia by improving/curing pages which have an importancy as those are high level administrative units, and, I am bloody struggling to find reliable references (that is the important aspect I am focusing at the moment). Thanks much for reviwing and suggesting things. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Kabondo, Kisangini) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kabondo, Kisangini, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Wikilink to Kisangani needed

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please get your bot to take a little more care!

Hello. I am dead impressed by the number of articles you've been creating recently. I don't know if you're using a bot, or just working very fast - a new page every six seconds sometimes. But I would urge you, please, to take a little more care in order to make your articles better. I realise you are very responsive to feedback, which is great. May I suggest the following things you/your bot should address:

• Commas and fullstops. These should not be preceded by spaces. A large number of your new articles I've seen today contain this fundamental error. Please take more care with these to avoid other editors having to clean up after you, which simply isn't fair on them. e.g. Mangobo; Kasha (commune).
• Your articles are often underlinked, and users are helped if you include wikilinks to cities, lakes and other key features in the Congo (and elsewhere).e.g. Irumu Territory, Wangata, Molegbe
• Content should be based on cited sources. You have been adding all sorts of information which your very basic references fail to support at all. e.g. Gbadolite (Commune) and Ibanda, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Please do not add content based on your personal knowledge - if you've found it somewhere, please cite it.
• A huge suite of near-identical articles have used the same reference with a url in the publisher field, which displays red in the references section. e.g.Moussa Foyo. Please fix these.

Many thanks for the work you're doing, and my apologies for sounding critical. But I think its for the best. Finally, I was a little worried whether a key reference at Statoids.com is a reliable source. Can you assure me on this? - it was hard to determine if it is a personal project of someone, or an academic follow-on of published literature. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

@ Nick Moyes Thanks Nick. I too notice those need some kind of proof readings. Thanks for mentioning those. Actually I expect other contributors later cure the missing links. Anyhow, I will do it more in future, Thanks. Those uncited content I generally regarded as fact which do not need citations (assume I am in that perticular country, for example). Please add citations needed tags if you feel that is valuable. External link thing can be fixed later. Thanks. Yes, http://www.statoids.com/ycd.html, Statoids.com is less reliable according to me too, but, it is based on other reliable sources in some cases, and it is used in other articles. I don't much like to use statoids as this is a secondary source, but, unfortunately I was unable to find good more reliable source on those article. Kindly if you find please add those. Thank you much for your suggestions those are much helpful. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Well, I'm amazed if you're doing it all manually! But that probably accounts for the sloppiness I've been seeing today. I don't accept that it's in any way acceptable for others to have to clean up all your little errors, or that you expect the're will be someone there who will. Yes, we all make mistakes, but it really is your responsibility - and you should be proud to do it - to create the best articles you can here. As for Those uncited content I generally regarded as fact which do not need citations (assume I am in that perticular country, for example) - no! no! and thrice, no! Whilst you can assume the sky is blue, and state it as a fact without any citations, you absolutely may not add stuff you happen to know because you've lived or visited somewhere and assume others know it too. This is a world-wide encyclopaedia. Editors who repeatedly add stuff without citations end up being blocked, or taken to WP:ANI where concerns can be thrashed out. Now, I'm not suggesting that's going to happen to you anytime soon, but that's not the right attitude for someone being so creative as you. If we say stuff here in articles, other users need to be able to see the reference, go away, and then use your citations to see that what's said is true, based on reliable sources. So, what part of the history section in Gbadolite (Commune) do you think it was OK just to add in without supportive referencing? Please add one or I shall sadly deem it appropriate to delete the entire section as being unsubstantiated, and that really would be a shame. You're working so fast that we need to trust you're doing it right. So, anyway, why not just slow down a bit and ensure you create the best pages you can, without you expecting other editors to follow along behind you to put things right, eh? Nick Moyes (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes You are really motivating me. Thanks. This is an interesting conversation. Facts, for example, that Woodrow Wilson served as president of both Princeton University and the United States, or that Avogadro’s number is 6.02 x 1023, or that the world is sphere, do not need citations. I agree that geographical places familiarity is different from person to person, that is why I mentioned think like I live in that country. Anyway, there is no very strict boundry between what is a fact and what is not a fact. Yes, I will try my best to minimise errors. You are absolutely right with Gbadolite (Commune). That truly needs citations for the content of history part. Thanks for adding the tag. I had to do it before. Thanks much Nick. You are truly motivating me. :) Shevonsilva (talk) 00:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gbadolite (commune)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gbadolite (commune). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gbadolite. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gbadolite. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. PamD 22:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Thanks for catching it. This is a mistake. Gbadolite contains 3 communes: Gbadolite, Molegbe and Nganza. kindly refer: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KvqcDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT347&lpg=PT347&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false. We have to keep it surely. I also modified it further to give more impression of the commune and removed history section which may collectively refer to the city part too. I removed the speedy deletion tag to save time. Thanks Pam. 23:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Please never remove CSD tags from articles you have created: it is against the rules. Even if you believe you're right. Just read the instructions and leave it to someone else to remove the tag.

I see you have now added a decent source to the article. Please add sources like this when you create articles, rather than adding content you "know" or providing links to pages which do not appear to support your text. Quality is more important than quantity. Thanks. PamD 05:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam please do not add speedy deletion tags without properly searching information. Try to changed and improve if you find any missing thing. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I've only just spotted this reply - see below for how to use the "Reply to" template. Your stub said it was about a "city and commune"; there is an existing, much better sourced, article about the city. There was no evidence that your "commune" exists. It is up to you to provide sourced to support the content you add to the encyclopedia. You added a good source, eventually. It would be useful to add the information about the three communes to the article about the city, now that you have supplied that source. Please stop cluttering the encyclopedia with unsourced stubs. PamD 15:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Dear Pam, In https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KvqcDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT347&lpg=PT347&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false, it is clearly mentioned it as a commune. Yes, I agree, we improved the article based on your comments: that is really good. Thanks. Pam, there is a very important thing to notice, I am only creating the articles which are already missed, that may mean contributors are already unable to find sources sometimes, and, I am too really struggling to find better sources. That is good you are creating lengthy articles, I too created those. This is really different case. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Navigation

When you create an article with a disambiguated title like Peni, Chad, remember to add it to the disambiguation page at Peni (sometimes a hatnote will be needed instead). Otherwise the reader cannot find the new article. Again, please slow down and produce better stubs with navigational links. Thanks. PamD 06:04, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Exactly. Added. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

And take more care - that Peni article is one sentence but has a clear mistake in the "s" on "subprefectures". Do you look at what you have contributed? Please check everything carefully. Thanks. PamD 06:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam yes. sorry. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

"More care". Indeed. It would really help if you could learn the utter basic rules of English, before generating more low-quality articles. This (.) is called a "full stop". It goes at the end of a sentence. It is placed immediately after the last letter of the last word in the sentence. There is no space before the full stop, but there is a space after the full stop. Similarly, this (,) is a comma and the same rules apply. So this (quote): "Oubangi . Gbado , as it is" should be "Oubangi. Gbado, as it is". Also, if you are going around adding hundreds of tiny low-value articles for every village in Africa, the least you could do is link to them from the including area. And, of course, I have to ask, is the addition of these hundreds of "list" articles an improvement to Wikipedia? It would surely be more helpful simply to include a list of subdivisions at the next level up. Imaginatorium (talk) 06:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium yes and it include more work. :) I tried to cover at least the top level administrative devisions. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shevonsilva: First, if you are trying to draw someone's attention to a post, you don't just type @Shevonsilva, but you must type {{reply to|Shevonsilva}} or {{ping|Shevonsilva}} or one of the various other options listed at the template documentation of {{reply to}}.

@Pam Thanks, some people do not like for those templates as they are getting multiple alerts when ever I am saving a page. Anyway I will try to find a proper solution for this. Shevonsilva (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't understand the problem here. If you use the {{ping}} template the editor you are pinging will get one notification that you have pinged them in the one posting. There will never be multiple alerts caused this way. Multiple alerts can be a problem if someone has watchlisted a page and an editor then makes many small edits to it rather than one substantial edit, but that's a quite different issue. PamD 21:49, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@PamD: you are right. This is a funny story. I only used ping. A lady got angry and blamed me she was always getting alerts whenever I updated the page. Yes, that is helpful. I will try to use {{reply to|..}}. Thanks, Pam. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:26, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Then: Please tidy up your own mistakes. You have obviously created a number of articles using a standard pattern with "a subprefectures" - the list at Category:Stubs includes Roro, Chad and Rigaza within the letter "R" and presumably there are many more. You made these mistakes in our encyclopedia. Please fix them now before going on to create any more stubs. Please also add articles to disambiguation pages where necessary: Roro does not include a link to your new stub. PamD 15:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Your reply is based on what the findings of other contributors and I already replied them. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Dasenech (woreda)

What is the Amharic name? Interlink?Xx236 (talk) 06:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Xx236 Actually I do not know. Better to add it. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pont Karwal

The article Pont Karwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of existence, let alone status as a commune.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 07:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam yes. Thanks. Sub-prefectures of Chad which is based on proper references, led me to believe its existance. yes for speedy deletion. Good work in reviewing. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peni, Chad

The article Peni, Chad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of existence, let alone commune status - neither source provided appears to mention the place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 07:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam This a mistake. Two sources are actually mentioning Peni, and, here more: https://www.accuweather.com/en/td/peni/53793/weather-forecast/53793, http://www.tageo.com/index-e-cd-v-11-d-m1631595.htm, etc. I remember there was a really good article about Australian Units and Measurements and it was deleted in the end and we lost the content of aborginal units and measurement there forever upto now. :( Shevonsilva (talk) 13:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Which of those sources says that Peni is a subprefecture? I cannot find it listed in your reference 1. If it was listed there, it would be helpful to tell us which Prefecture it is in, as this information is in that list. The two newly added references confirm that some sort of place exists called Peni, but say nothing more about it, and I am not sure that either is a Reliable Source. PamD 15:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam come on Pam.:) Peni in page 4 of https://web.archive.org/web/20110304124933/http://ig-tchad.org/Documents/codes_circonscriptions.pdf is under sub-prefecture. Peni in http://chad.opendataforafrica.org/nhqvrnb/social-statistics is under third-level division (which is an overlapped information for sub-prefecture. Shevonsilva (talk) 17:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Page 4 of the link you give is a table which has BONGOR as its first subprefecture entry, with "CODE GOUVERNORAT" 11. Where do you see Peni? Please tell me which Gouvernorat and Prefecture it is listed under. I don't think the presence in the index of the Social Statistics is a worthwhile reference. Please provide a source which shows that Peni is a subprefecture. Thanks. PamD 21:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Sorry, it is page 3 in https://web.archive.org/web/20110304124933/http://ig-tchad.org/Documents/codes_circonscriptions.pdf, and, kindly go through 10 -> MANDOUL -> 03 -> MANDOUL -> 04 = bang: that is PENI under sub-prefecture. In http://chad.opendataforafrica.org/nhqvrnb/social-statistics, go through Chad -> Mandoul Orcidental -> Peni (Peni is in the third level). For Social statistics, opendataforafrica is sponsored by African Development Bank Group. The problem is it may not be easy find reliable sources for these places. Anyway, if you find more reliable resouce, you are wellcome to add. :) Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Birqod

Neither of your references is any use - one does not mention the place, the other is a dead link. Please provide a better source to verify that this place (a) exists and (b) is a District, or is it a "Woreda"? You have added the template {{Districts of the Somali Region}}, but Birqod is not listed there, in this long-established template. All very confusing for the reader. Please check your information sources. And please add more information - if you have a source which says it is in the Somali Region, then say so and include that link, in both text and infobox. Which of the Administrative Zones listed in that article is it in? Your sources should surely tell. Again please slow down and produce better, rather than so many, stubs. Thanks. PamD 16:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam I really believe, you have a lack of understanding of the content. First, in http://rasaasa.com/?page_id=6986, it is mentioned with Bir-qod: there can be an accent variation and iit is there. Secondly, I cannot modify {{Districts of the Somali Region}} because these districts are changing rapidly as these places are continuesly occupied by various rebel groups. District and Woreda is same. The source already present Birqod as a district (i.e. degmada). I added further reference, and, removed the citation tag. Thank for your keenful-ness. Shevonsilva (talk) 18:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

If the only source which names a place uses a different spelling, then it is important to mention that spelling in the article, and indeed to move the article to that spelling. The second reference "Feedyeti" does not work - I get "error 502 - bad gateway" consistently. The map looks interesting and reliable, but can't be used as a source - you don't say which Zone or Region we can find Bir-god/Birgod in, and the reader can't be expected to scan that entire map to find verification of the existence of the place. PamD 21:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Thanks for modifying the article. Bir-qod may not be very commonly used. I found a lot of similar cases and went through commonly used ones as those are translation tables from other languages. Yes, I too got it. Now I am trying to find a cached location for it. Pam, I am a bit dis-agree with your argument. Reviewer has to find the references. In academic writings, readers job is not always to check easy find references: extracting information from the sources sometimes hard (sometimes, they even cann't access it), but, reliability is more important. A map can be used as a reference. Thanks for having an interesting conversation, Pam. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:23, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Doutsila Department) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Doutsila Department, Shevonsilva!

Wikipedia editor Natureium just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It may be better for you to create an article, have someone look over it, and then proceed with mass creation. Each batch of articles has had some minor fixes required that would have been easier to correct before. Natureium (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Natureium's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

@Natureium: Thanks. I believe the "See also" section is very important for the article. May I know the reason for removal of it? :) Shevonsilva (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shevonsilva: The see also section is for links that many be interesting to a reader, but aren't already linked in the article. The link to departments is already in the article, so it doesn't need to be duplicated. Natureium (talk) 12:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium what do you think of places like this Northern Department? What I considered was to give more attention to the main article too, and, when it is getting bigger it is harder for readers to locate Departments of Gabon which is an important link. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're asking about that article. Departments of Gabon is linked in the first (only) sentence, so if someone isn't sure what a department is, they can click on it when they read about it. Natureium (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium I got what you are considering. I was thinking when it is getting bigger it will be harder to locate. It is fine. I have improved the article more. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium I am concering of the usage of "See also" and feel it still useful to have it in the article as a cross reference for the user as a guidance. kindly refer (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED401916.pdf). Thanks Shevonsilva (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia has a policy about this. See MOS:NOTSEEALSO. Natureium (talk) 17:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium That policy is contracding itself unfortunately. Thanks for providing a link for it. Shevonsilva (talk) 18:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Page titles

Hi Shevonsilva, as the note I left on Talk:Doutsila_Department said, these titles in the form of "Example Department" aren't the form we use on the English Wikipedia. This batch of articles needs to be corrected, but I'm not sure if Doutsila, Gabon is correct or if Doutsila (department) is better because I'm not familiar with the administrative divisions of Gabon. Can you help me out here? Natureium (talk) 01:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium: All other departments of Gabon follows the same pattern, e.g. Komo Department. It may be commonly used as "Doutsila Department"; I don't know; We have to re-direct 50 departments. Can you please provide me the reference of the guildline to impose "Example, Department" unless there is a clear conflict? Thanks Natureium. Shevonsilva (talk) 02:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium: It should be "Example (Department)": parentheses are for dis-ambiguity and comma is for hierarchy generally. Anyway, let me know your thoughts. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Take care about capital letters: the disambiguation would be "(department)". PamD 05:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Shevonsilva: unless the proper name of the department is Doutsila Department, it should be used as a description rather than part of the name itself. And Pam is correct about the capitalization. WP:TITLES has more information on this. Natureium (talk) 12:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium: Thanks, we may need someone from Gabon. There are are over 40 existing articles created before my articles were created and which are to be changed as a bunch. I don't know it a common name or not. I will leave this to the community to change all the 50 department in the page Departments of Gabon, as I am too not sure the usage of Proper name.

Shevonsilva (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Natureium after searching much about this I have corrected the 50 departments (including the few I have created). Wow, what a job. :) Shevonsilva (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Mass additions

You have been adding "articles" on administrative divisions of Africa. It does appear that you are simply copying lists out of various (not very reliable) sources; you added the last seven (Offoué-Onoye Department, Mongo Department, Doutsila Department, Bayi-Brikolo Department, Lékabi-Léwolo Department, Ogooué-Létili Department, Komo-Océan Department) in the space of 10 seconds. (Yes, ten seconds). I wonder how you do this, and how much care you put into checking the notional information that you are adding? Actually, since you only appear to be expanding lists into stubette articles, this does not strictly appear to add any information at all. I am contemplating an AfD for an arbitrarily selected example, so that there could be a discussion on whether this is useful, but I welcome your comments first. I suppose, incidentally, that it is pure coincidence that a similar list was added to French wikipedia a week or so ago by User:LAT44. Imaginatorium (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium, Simple, some information portals simply extract information from Wikipedia for their definitions for words. These articles should be there. I am not clear what you are considering. New information added are: new references for existence, these are now in category list, these locations are part of the project Africa, Are you going to put AfD for all the departments in Departments of Gabon? I am not getting anything from this. How fast I am creating the articles is not a factor to be considered. I feel bad about this, some others consider Africa is less important. This is not right. I have a thought of deleting all the articles I have created (except for a few, I already contacted the original authors of the concepts) and stay away from Wikipedia. That might be easier than expecting contributors support to expanding it, as I already started to use Encyclopedia Britainna. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I do not think your "expansions" are improving Wikipedia. If you did them in software, at least they would be consistent, but as it is you leave masses of errors. (And neither "reference" you cite is actually valuable: one is a kind of blog supporting sales of a book, the other is "official" but is only a passing mention.) PamD asked you very politely to clean up the mess you are making, so you deleted her comment. I do not think this is cooperative behaviour. If you are not here to cooperate, I will certainly support taking you to ANI. Imaginatorium (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium OK. What is on that comment is already in the previous comment under you, and, I already replied for it. That is not much polite. Cooperation is different and non-polite languagle is differnt. I already inform him/her about it. Can you show me the location of poorly cited article? Shevonsilva (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Offoué-Onoye Department There are two references:

• 1: from http://sgg.gouv.ga/ is official, but gives only a passing mention (which doesn't even confirm the name, since it's block caps, no accents)
• 2: from http://statoids.com/ is a bloggy site, supporting sales of a book; again, it's only a list

Neither of these adds any information; the "article" as a whole is simply a copy of the entry at Departments of Gabon, which is more usable. It looks rather from the official bulletin that "Départements" (as I would call them) are created at whim. Have you noticed anything about the "capital" of Offoué-Onoye, I wonder? Imaginatorium (talk) 14:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium interesting. I will go to have coffee outside. I will be back and address these. Kindly give me some time. Shevonsilva (talk) 15:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Imaginatorium I am back.

Case 1: http://sgg.gouv.ga/: this is the first time, I heard that something cannot be confirmed if it is in block capital. Kindly give me a reference for it in academic materials. Yes, it is without accents.

Case 2: http://statoids.com/ is for book and http://statoids.com/yga.html is based on references: [1] Géographie et Cartographie du Gabon: atlas illustré, by Jacques Barret, EDICEF, Paris, 1983.,[2] SALB project, attributed to Institut :::::National de Cartographie; first draft dated 2000, second draft dated 2005, with updates made 2003-01-15 (Libreville, correcting a misunderstanding) and 2003-04-03 (Bayi-Brikolo, Mougalaba, and Mongo).,[3] Consulate of Gabon in France (retrieved 2009-04-06)., [4] Internet Gabon (dated 2008, retrieved 2009-04-06)., [5] Journal Officiel de la République Gabonaise: Jan. 1997 (retrieved 2009-04-06)., [6] Gabon National Assembly website (retrieved 2009-04-06).[7] legabon.org (retrieved 2009-04-06)., [8] 2003 population figures from Journal Officiel de la République Gabonaise, Février 2005, p. 11 ff. These data are as corrected by the constitutional court in Decision No. 003/CC, 2005-02-17. Can you prove me the validity of the references provided or it is wrong under your review?

Collective case 1: My naming is based on the article, Departments of Gabon and it was there before hand. So, we have to review that article first.

Collective case 2: http://statoids.com/ is mentioned in a vast majority of articles and I also provided my opinion of it in a previous talk.

Collective case 3: naming of these yet to be confirmed in English and Community can redirect these when there is a common usage.

Important point: These should be in the encyclopedia as these are high level administrative units, and for example, for England, there are articles for tiny units too.

Point to un-bias effort of mine: a vast number of departments in Gabon, for example, Komo Department, [[Komo-Mondah Department], Noya Department and much more, do not even have any references. May be considered as a fact sometimes (arguemental). We are to much worrying about it. My articles are far more better than those.

Thanks for your contribution. Shevonsilva (talk) 17:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Shevonsilva: I am not going to waste my time responding to all of your rambling. Your grasp of English is simply not good enough for a reasonable discussion. OK, I will do one sentence, headed "Case 1: http://sgg.gouv.ga/:" above. I simply pointed out that since the passing mention of the name in a government bulletin is in French block caps, it does not even confirm the precise spelling. Yes, of course all the letters agree, but we cannot tell if an 'e' should have an acute accent or not. | The basic point is that you are creating microstubs (literally hundreds? what on earth for?) and these have generally less information, less reliably copied, than in the list articles from which you expanded them. You get to list all these on your user page, and that's about it. Imaginatorium (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@ Your grasp of English is simply not good enough for a reasonable discussion: can you point out which part of it you really meant (please read my full response) (FYI: I am more qualified in English than you)?

For spellings (I exaclty know you are worried about Block Caps; I created it, and faced the same problem, and, kindly google it with the accent, there are references, we can redirect it after the name is well established: not the official name but the most common name is the more important), please refer: Collective case 1 and Collective case 3.

For Stubs: Kindly check https://www.google.com/search?q=Nounkounkan+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab, you will understand the value of it as a person who want reliable information of a place in Africa. And, I already mentioned about information portals are using wikipedia titles to extract information (not the content).

My user page is a cross reference of my articles involved for easy access and may expand later (That is personel).

Kindly read my full response as I am trying clear your doubts and I am using my time for it.

Kindly do not take my responses as a rude way, you are attacking my personally than doing a contribution (as I felt), Sorry.Shevonsilva (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Your responses are not really "rude"; they just confirm you cannot understand what anyone else is saying. I repeat the main problem: "The basic point is that you are creating microstubs, and these have generally less information, less reliably copied, than in the list articles from which you expanded them." Show some evidence that you can understand this. The very first comment on your user page (several years ago) is an unrelated user asking you to stop creating low-quality stubs. Why do you take no notice? Imaginatorium (talk) 19:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Addtional point: articles for Botella (measurement), Dimi (metric prefix), Bucket (unit) and Quarter yard were created by me in the beginning. It was recommended for deletion, later, those were re-created, and, better to improve the articles than deleting and re-creating it again. I truely need openions from people around the world and there is always a few here. Shevonsilva (talk) 21:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Correction: it is not true to say that those four articles were re-created. Botella (measurement) is a red link, no mention of a measurement at the Botella disambiguation page; Dimi (metric prefix), Bucket (unit) and Quarter yard are all redirects. I remember the whole painful episode of those dubious articles on units, sourced to a single book which appeared to be completely unreliable. Please don't complicate matters now by making false assertions. PamD 22:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Re-directions are regarded as a creation. It happened later. Shevonsilva (talk) 01:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up

I'm pleased to see that you have now fixed your "a subprefectures" mistakes. Thanks. PamD 22:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@maginatorium @PamD Yap, heavy work. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Article titles again

Why are you creating articles with titles like Louetsi-Bibaka (department)? There is no other article in the encyclopedia with the title Louetsi-Bibaka, so there is no need to disambiguate. Please stop creating incorrectly titled articles. Thanks. PamD 22:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

And if for some reason that was the correct title for the page, then you should have added it to a disambiguation page, or made a hatnote, or created a redirect, at Louetsi-Bibaka, so that the reader had a chance of finding the page. From your reply to my posting at #Navigation above I thought that you now understood this point (it applies to bracketed disambiguation just as much as to comma disambiguation), but evidently you do not understand it. Please make sure that readers can find your articles, by providing appropriate navigation to disambiguated titles. Thanks. PamD 22:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@PamD The problem is with Departments of Gabon page. It gives all sort of errors. Someone has to fix it. Redirected it. Shevonsilva (talk) 23:09, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

I hope you are not using the Departments of Gabon page as a source for your articles: Wikipedia is not a Reliable Source. PamD 23:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam it is the main page for the category Shevonsilva (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

You need to create articles at correct titles, regardless of what other editors may have done in the past. Then make redirects from any alternatives which have been used, or correct the links. Please name your new stubs correctly, always. PamD 07:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

PamD, hope you understand how much effort I am giving here with sources in different languages with variety of spelling variations. Yes, I will do my best. Shevonsilva (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Come on

I just found Nounkounkan where you didn't even get the name of the subject right in the article, and cited the wrong source. I don't know what you're trying to do, and I assume you mean well, but the level of clean-up required while you race to create articles at breakneck speed is disruptive, and I am seriously considering requesting that you are blocked from creating articles until you agree to clean up after yourself. Vexations (talk) 01:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vexations Ooooooops. yes, thanks for correcting. I am really trying to finish the gaps in the Africa asap. Thanks, it was a big error. Shevonsilva (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please take an moment and read Wikipedia:There is no deadline. Vexations (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vexations yes I will take more care on these small articles. Anyway, this is more enjoyable and challenging for me as it is very hard to find sources for the places in Africa, and than creating lenghy articles with plenty of sources for the moment. And, I am learning a plenty of things in every angle. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vexations https://www.google.com/search?q=Nounkounkan+&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-ab: don't we feel great, now people can get more reliable information about the place, whole world knows about it, people can navigate over wider range tover sub-prefecture in Guinea. didn't we do a great work? :) I know mistake may happen as this is a lot of editings. I will try to minimise it. Shevonsilva (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Destubathon banner

Why are you adding the Destubathon banner to pages like Talk:East, Guinea-Bissau? It was a short-term project in 2016 to expand and improve on stubs for Africa, and your work is going in exactly the opposite direction by creating hundreds of minimal stubs which don't even include the information available from your own sources (eg which higher-level units a place is in, or its coordinates). Please remove that inappropriate banner where you have added it. Thanks. PamD 05:34, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@Pam Did you see any positive thing over my hard work to cover big gaps in Africa and trying to give more attention of the continent? Do you know how difficult for me to find information on these places of the Africa? Shevonsilva (talk) 15:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

You didn't answer my question. Why are you adding an inappropriate project banner to those talk pages? PamD 18:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Why not give more information?

Your two sources for Bomachoge Chache Constituency both tell us that it is in Kisii County. So why not include that information in your stub article? It really looks as if your sole goal is to add to the number of articles you can list yourself as having created, rather than the addition of useful information to the encyclopedia. Please add more content when it is so clearly available to you from your sources.

You added it to the category Category:Constituencies of Kenya. Perhaps you didn't notice that this category has subdivisions by province and by county. Again, you could have made this stub so much more useful by using the information which you had at hand, instead of rushing on to create the next article.

You have also used the wrong infobox. There is a specialised infobox {{Infobox constituency}}. Please use this one in future for any constituencies, instead of {{Infobox settlement}}.

I've upgraded this one, but please make your articles better as you go along. Thanks. PamD 19:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@PamD To be honest, I left to update later about the categories as these were provice by provice,. Two important findings: Category:Constituencies of Kenya and {{Infobox constituency}}. Thanks. I will add categories in a bit later after taking a rest. Shevonsilva (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@PamD It was fixed by a reviewer. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:35, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Commonwealth District, Montserrado County

This is much better than many of your stub creations have been. You have told us which county the place is in, and added some census data: thanks.

I have improved the article by adding the county and the census data to the infobox - there is little point in having an infobox unless you use it to provide as much info as is available.

You now need to add this article to the disambiguation page at Commonwealth District so that readers can find it - particularly as there are two other districts of the same name in Liberia. Please remember that whenever you create an article with a disambiguated name you need to make sure that there is navigation to it from the basic name, from a disambiguation page or a hatnote (I see you have not yet made a link from Roro to Roro, Chad, as just one example). PamD 19:20, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

@PamD Thanks. Important things to notice. Shevonsilva (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

You say you notice these things but you have created a huge number more stubs where you don't tell us the info you know, eg Monguel Department which you know from your source is in Gorgol Region. Just include that important extra fact, please. PamD 05:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I am thinking to add it in a later stage. Really tired of finding references for existence of these places and some places mentioned in Wikipedia are not really existing sometimes. At the moment, I am correcting those. Big work. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Instead of your self-imposed "big work" of creating a multitude of micro-stubs, please put a little more effort into each one to provide useful information for the reader. Your effort at Mabo Arrondissement didn't give a clue as to where in Senegal to find Mabo. From the sources you included it was clear that it is in Kaffrine Region and Kaffrine Department. Adding that, with links, as I have done, gives the reader the opportunity to link to an article on the region with a map and see that it's roughly central, not coastal or near the borders, and to find out something about the department and the region. Your stub does much less to help the reader than would be done by a redirect to Arrondissements of Senegal, where the reader would find which department the arrondissement is in, and a map. Your stream of "it is in Senegal and that's all I'm bothered to tell you" stubs are doing the reader a disservice. PamD 08:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Addressed. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Stubs again

Please add an appropriate stub tag to your bulk-created stubs, to save other editors doing so one at a time and Category:Stubs being flooded with African subdivisions. There is always a country stub eg {{Mauritania-geo-stub}}. In some cases there are stub tags for divisions, but they could be sorted out later. PamD 05:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Mauritania now

Hello! I just looked at the "article" M'Bagne Department, which is a truly extraordinary block of text. It looks as though it has been copied from some editorial comment somewhere, but the punctuation etc etc is as awful as most of your contributions. (And I think this means it can't be machine translation.) Can you explain where it came from? Is there any chance you could respond to requests to slow down, and produce positive contributions instead of junkstubs? Imaginatorium (talk) 08:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Very sorry, it was in another source. The content wasn't encyclopedic. Removed. I really need the help from all of you to complete this work. Later we can add more information. Shevonsilva (talk) 14:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Navigation again

Please remember to make a link from the basic name of an area, via a redirect or hatnote or disambiguation page entry. I have added Mabo Arrondissement to the disambiguation page at Mabo, but if you really want to help readers to find your stubs you need to do this for all your articles which have compound names like that. If you are seriously trying to help readers to find out about these places, you need to provide navigation tools. If you are only trying to increase your list of "articles" created, then of course you don't. Thanks. PamD 08:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes, a bit tired. Will do. I will re-check the list. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Madagascar stubs

FYI, all the Madagascar stubs you created have the short title "Madagascar in Madagascar". I assume you mean this to be "District in Madagascar"? Natureium (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

It looks as if this comes from the piping in the infobox which leaves "settlement type" as "Madagascar" rather than "District", judging by a sample of one at Sakaraha District. So a bot is picking up the "settlement type" and creating the short title "Madagascar in Madagascar", working on the basis that the word displayed in the infobox is actually the name of the kind of settlement, as it should be. Presumably the same mistake replicated thoughtlessly across the whole set of articles. Please fix all of these now, by changing settlement_type = [[Districts of Madagascar|Madagascar]] to settlement_type = [[Districts of Madagascar|District]]. The "short title" will then come out as "District in Madagascar", which is what we want. And the infobox will have a correct display rather than restating the country name in the wrong place. Thanks. PamD 18:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

I will go through it after a little break. Shevonsilva (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Addressed Shevonsilva (talk) 02:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

See also citation discussion

Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)/Archive_144#See_Also

visual editor on non-article pages

Hello You can manually invoke the Visual Editor on any page by editing the URL to add a "ve" right in front of the word "action" after the ampersand. from "…?title=User_talk:Shevonsilva&action=edit" to …"?title=User_talk:Shevonsilva&veaction=edit". Veaction works on just about every edit-URL except the new section feature. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 20:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

@L3X1: Thanks. Unfortunately it produces ?veaction=edit&action=edit and moving to default manual editing in my talk page. :( Shevonsilva (talk) 02:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, all, please refer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_166#Visual_Editor_for_Talk_pages,_Discussion_pages,_etc , for the village pump discussion link too.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shevonsilva. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Shevonsilva. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Biblio (talk) 02:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 06:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Shevonsilva,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Tambura State) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tambura State.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good work; maybe you could expand this if other more sources which cover this topic in-depth are available?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SkyGazer 512}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 04:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Komboya Chiefdom) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Komboya Chiefdom.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please be careful about creating dab links in articles, such as Njala, in this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Cut & paste error on Barri Chiefdom

You made a cut & paste error on Barri Chiefdom. The text of your 1 Jan edit reads "Upper Banta Chiefdom...". I've amended the name, but am not sure the capital you specify will be correct. Please check the article. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sucre Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Jorge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

closer look

Having challenged the red linking of headings for admin regions in Indonesia - which I believe to be a WP:MOS error, the actual admin divisions already existed in the tables - and are not your problem, except that you are assuming that such items deserve an article by creating red links? I doubt there is adequate WP:RS to justify such items.

My apology for assuming you created the distinction - I hadnt been aware of them earlier. However weird and wonderful rabbit holes exist in the Indonesian project that really are regular amazing phenomenon beyond the average persons comprehension of what constitutes common sense. cheers JarrahTree 01:50, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

you are constantly asked to WP:SIGN - please try! JarrahTree 01:52, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Sindou Department - Kénédougou provice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sindou Department - Kénédougou provice. Since you had some involvement with the Sindou Department - Kénédougou provice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Cobblet (talk) 22:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Redlinks

Shevonsilva, I have reverted a large number of links that were added to various Solomon Island pages because they are red links that do not yet have pages and there is no evidence that pages are being created. It would be great if the pages did exist and maybe you are writing them already but the protocol is that red links are avoided except under certain conditions. If you are creating these pages please consider making the links after the pages exist. Ex nihil ^(talk) : Ex nihil (talk) 01:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I am thinking to create those later and also as a part of wikidata too. Shevonsilva (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Sounds good, if you have a project to create these Solomons pages you might consider setting up that project here and on the relevant Talk pages to encourage people to create them. Redlinks have a useful place in encouraging people to create a much needed article but a whole page of them in a list can make reading the page hard work. Ex nihil ^(talk) : Ex nihil (talk) 02:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I understand. Thanks. I don't have any particular project; This is only as a help.Shevonsilva (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Reviewed!

Hi,

I've reviewed the six pages you made on Districts in Ghana.

Many thanks,

SITH (talk) 13:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Geography Barnstar
		For your contributions to a much neglected area of Wikipedia. Elspamo4 (talk) 10:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Regions of El Salvador

You edited https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Departments_of_El_Salvador&diff=878663511&oldid=862373562

Can you create a page for the set "Regions of El Salvador"? Then in the Infobox settlement one could link there. 78.55.217.90 (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Take more care

You create Alexandria Regional Unit etc. but the category you call Economic regions of Egypt. The type names should match. 78.55.217.90 (talk) 08:48, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. Alexandria Regional Unit was a part of the article Economic regions of Egypt and the article was moved to Regional units of Egypt (refer: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economic_regions_of_Egypt&action=history) after Alexandria Regional Unit was created and reviewed, and the page mover had to make the changes. Shevonsilva (talk) 00:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello Shevonsilva,

News

• The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

• Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
• {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
• A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
• There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

• NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

• Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
• copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
• The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Check your email

Hello, Shevonsilva. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Mastabah Sub-district) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mastabah Sub-district.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Citation #1 seems to be broken, both the main link and the archive link.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

yes, only archived link is working at the moment. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello Shevonsilva,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

• Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
• Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

• Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

• A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
• There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
• What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Burí

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Burí. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Büri, Panama. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Büri, Panama. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JTtheOG (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Re-created as it is a different place in Jirondai District, with different spelling. Shevonsilva (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

I've deleted this because it was identical to Büri, Panama. If you want to draw attention to that article, you can add it to the disambiguation page at Buri. Many thanks, SarahSV ^(talk) 02:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Sorry, It is not identical to Büri, Panama as Jirondai District is mentioned in info box; I have added Burí, Jirondai, Panama and the entries were inserted in Buri too. Shevonsilva (talk) 13:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Naming conventions

It would be helpful if you respect naming conventions.

• Provinces of Oman - some have "X Province", some "X". That is confusing to readers.
• Jordan: governorate as part of a name is capitalized, but you don't do that https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mastabah_Sub-district&diff=883685788&oldid=883685231

77.11.167.158 (talk) 11:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Provinces of Oman - this problem is there with pre-existing articles before i created the articles: new articles were created with common pattern.

Jordan - Sorry, there is no convention like that (e.g. content in Zarqa_Governorate). Shevonsilva (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

High quality English required: Belgian units of measurement

This is the text of the lead to the article Belgian units of measurement, which you created. I understand you believe you are highly qualified in the writing of English, so perhaps you could have a look at this.

Prior to adopting the metric system in 1816 a number of units of measurement were used in Belgium to measure different types of quantities including length, mass, area. Since 1820, International Metric System has been compulsory in Belgium, and in the starting, different names were used for units like meter, litre, kilogram, etc.

(Leaving aside the problem that Belgium seems to have legally adopted the metric system even before it existed...) Sentence 1: "Prior to adopting..." is I believe called a dangling participle. Can you explain why it is correct? Sentence 2: What is the "International Metric System"? Is it different from the ordinary "metric system"? Why is it capitalised? Doesn't it need an article? The phrase "in the starting" is entirely new to me: perhaps you can explain it. In formal English lists do not normally need "etc." at the end, though they might need an "and". Why have you used American spelling for "meter" and everyone else's spelling for "litre"? Is there something difficult I need to know here? Imaginatorium (talk) 12:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your response.

"Prior to adopting..." -> this was not done by me: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Belgian_units_of_measurement&diff=next&oldid=640701136&diffmode=source; This is grammetically correct as gerund phrase is functioning as a noun.

"International Metric System" -> common use: “On the basis of the evidence marshalled in the U.S. Metric Study, this report recommends that the United States change to the International Metric System” (D.V. De Simone, A Metric America: A Decision Whose Time Has Come)(https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=n_NxzeZawbMC&pg=PA85#v=onepage&q&f=false). "International Metric System" is referring "Metric System".

in the starting -> short form, for example, in the starting era of metric system (grammatically it is correct).

etc -> usage: there are other units other than metre, litre and kilogram

meter and liter -> you are right, Imaginatorium: modified. Shevonsilva (talk) 21:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello Shevonsilva,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SAP Design Studio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SAP Design Studio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 03:29, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Bulma (framework) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bulma (framework), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry, but we just can not continue like this. The problem with your editing are continuing for a decade, and they became really acute last year. You waste an enormous amount of time of new page patrollers, administrators who have to check the speedy deletion, draft reviewers who check your articles previously moved to draft, and other good faith editors. The time they waste outweighs the benefit of the few articles which survive, since most of your creations are either speedy deleted or move to draft and eventually get deleted as stale. I do not know whether this is a competence problem which you so far consistently refused to acknowledge, or something else, but you clearly need a block. I will now open a topic at AN, but generally ypou would need an unblock request explaining clearly what you are going to change in your workflow so that the majority of articles you create do not get speedy deleted. Please have in mind that you do not have so many chances, typically an admin declining the third or the fourth unblock request would revoke the talk page access.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Indefinite block of Shevonsilva--Ymblanter (talk) 11:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shevonsilva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There are loads of Books available on SAP products, so, I have created some articles about popular products with a good purpose on mind. Anyway, I am not going to create more articles about SAP or units. I am taking a break now as I have finished completing the gaps of knowledges in WP. I need the block to be removed. Thanks.

Decline reason:

You fail to reassure us that problematic editing, overall, will not persist. Please make sure to address the totality of concerns expressed with respect to your editing in a substantive (and dare I say, reflective) manner. El_C 11:52, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will submit a fully comprehensive request soon. Shevonsilva (talk) 12:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Complete unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shevonsilva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As a solution, I will stop creating further articles until next year and I will create the articles in the sandbox first then move it back to the WP, I will radically limit speed of article creation and I will include more content inside the articles. If there are doubtful entries like SAP articles and some previous administrative pages, I will open a discussion first before creating any articles in order to validate the notability. I really want to delete all the pending draft page entries to save the time and I do not know how to do it. Please let me know how to do it in order to avoid further disruption. Reducing article creation (my plan is one page for a month from next year) will resolve the problem by giving me more time to write a very comprehensive articles with high notability. In the moment, I really want to take a break as this is too much for me. Please let me know any additional workflow changes required to correct these problems too (I already stop using language translation tools and bots). Please remove the block asap as I really feel great about doing a service to the world through knowledge enhancement. I want to improve current articles too. Please remove the block asap as I want to make the improvement suggested by the reviewers.

Thanks.  Special note: I shared my blocking account information and my scripts, with my friends and house mates as I am currently in a shared house.  I have no idea about the shevonsilva2 and it looks like someone did experiments with ip blocking and scripting by using the scripts (also probably using my shared laptop or theirs (i do not know).  I have no idea how that account was created as in the moment, no one in the house can edit any Wiki page.  Thanks for restricting shevonsilva2 account if it is impersonating me (in the moment, our router IP is blocked from any editing).  Thanks.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. "Shevonsilva2" edited on one IP less than ten minutes before this one did. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Indefinite block of Shevonsilva. Johnuniq (talk) 05:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
• Given Shevonsilva just created a  Confirmed sock account to evade this block, the appeal should likely be declined outright.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Special note: I shared my blocking account information and my scripts, with my friends and house mates as I am currently in a shared house. I have no idea about the shevonsilva2 and it looks like someone did experiments with ip blocking and scripting by using the scripts in my accounts (also probably my shared laptop or theirs (i do not know)). I have no idea how it was created as in the moment no one in the house can edit any Wiki page at the moment because of my block. Thanks for restricting shevonsilva2 account if it is impersonating me. Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

This has to be one of the most convoluted and patently ridiculous "little brother" excuses I have read. And that's no easy feat.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

@Ponyo Please provide me the locations of IP addresses (mine is in Manchester) and more data for me. And, how they created the account while things are blocked here. (Anyway I am not really bothered anyone using or testing the scripts in my user page.) Please let me know someone is really impersonating me or checking the scripts and ip blocks. (Obviously used my user name with 2 as anyone can think it as a backup.) Thanks. Shevonsilva (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lower West Demerara Neighbourhood Democratic Council

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lower West Demerara Neighbourhood Democratic Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Twitter marketing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twitter marketing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twitter marketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imaginatorium (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cuyuni Neighbourhood Democratic Council

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cuyuni Neighbourhood Democratic Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Black Bush Polder Neighbourhood Democratic Council

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Bush Polder Neighbourhood Democratic Council".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Apache Spark SQL moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Apache Spark SQL, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

SAP Articles moved to draftspace

Hi just to let you know I have moved a certain number of articles created by you to draft space as they do not meet the necessary criteria for notability and need more work done to them to pass. There is potential so this is an alternative to deletion. So as not to flood your talk page with notifications I have unchecked the notification parameter. If you require help identifying them please don't hesitate. Cheers --Dom from Paris (talk) 09:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of GWT Highcharts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GWT Highcharts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GWT Highcharts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imaginatorium (talk) 10:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Weija Municipal District

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weija Municipal District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eagleash (talk) 11:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Complete unblock request with problematic shevonsilva2 account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shevonsilva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry, First, I found shevonsilva2 account info. A friend of mine created backup account for me when he was in London, and, he and some other friends also checked my scripting while they were in the house, without telling me, and they never did any wiki edits in Encyclopedia. (Redacted) I want to delete this account as my name is there (Now, I can log-in to that account and placed a deletion notice now, but,I cannot delete the account). Sorry for the inconvenience. As a solution, I will stop creating further articles until next year and I will create the articles in the sandbox first then move it back to the WP, I will radically limit speed of article creation and I will include more content inside the articles. If there are doubtful entries like SAP articles and some previous administrative pages, I will open a discussion first before creating any articles in order to validate the notability. I really want to delete all the pending draft page entries to save the time and I do not know how to do it. Please let me know how to do it in order to avoid further disruption. Reducing article creation (my plan is one page for a month from next year) will resolve the problem by giving me more time to write a very comprehensive articles with high notability. In the moment, I really want to take a break as this is too much for me. Please let me know any additional workflow changes required to correct these problems too (I already stop using language translation tools and bots). Please remove the block asap as I really feel great about doing a service to the world through knowledge enhancement. I want to improve current articles too. Please remove the block asap as I want to make the improvement suggested by the reviewers. Thanks.

Decline reason:

WP:AGF only goes so far. Wikipedia gains nothing from unblocking you, and given the amount of time that has already been wasted on you, you are a net negative to the project. I am declining your appeal and revoking your talkpage access. Yunshui ^雲_水 11:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the password you included in your appeal - do not ever post passwords to accounts on Wikipedia. Please also stop continuously modifying your unblock request, it makes it more complicated for admins to review. There are serious concerns regarding your ability to edit productively regardless of a content creation topic ban; your behaviour here as well as your socking compounds those concerns. I think an indefinite block is the only solution, especially given your explanation for the creation and use of the sock account, but will step back to allow another admin to review.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for that. Thanks. Please delete that account asap as this is making matters more complicated to me too. Really sorry for this shevonsilva2 account hazard occurred. Shevonsilva (talk) 22:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Let's get this straight. You say that you have a friend that has full access to your house and to your computers, and can use your WWW browser and your editing scripts. Can this friend access this account? Uncle G (talk) 23:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

no. I am the only one who knows the password of my account, Shevonsilva. Other mistakes were caused by me and I really want to correct and improve myself and help WP as I can. (We even share some bank account information too.) Shevonsilva (talk) 23:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kruševac, Podgorica

Hello, Shevonsilva,

Thanks for creating Kruševac, Podgorica! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

A real estate classified listings site, like www.realitica.com, is not a WP:RS.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nsk92 (talk) 11:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Your emails

Can you stop emailing me? I do not handle unblock requests by email. I have not reviewed any of your unblock requests nor have I even familiarized myself with your situation; all I did was fix an error made by another user on your talk page. I shouldn't be dragged into this mess with a barrage of unsolicited emails. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Email revoked: I have already told you that the appropriate venue in which to request unblocking is via UTRS. Since I'm clearly not the only person to be receiving unsolicited emails from you, I have also removed your access to Wikipedia's email system for the duration of the block. Yunshui ^雲_水 18:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about SAP Simple Finance

Hello, Shevonsilva,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, SAP Simple Finance should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAP Simple Finance .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about SAP Smart Forms

Hello, Shevonsilva,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, SAP Smart Forms should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAP Smart Forms .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Steve Quinn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice of AN discussion

Per this discussion at the Administrators' noticeboard, you have been banned from the English Wikipedia. With your talk page access revoked, your only option going forward (should you wish to return to the Wikipedia community in the future) is to appeal via UTRS after a minimum of six months. Primefac (talk) 13:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello Shevonsilva,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
• Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Region V, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region V, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Region IV, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region IV, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Region II, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region II, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Standard (unit) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Standard (unit) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standard (unit) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk _YO! 15:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Argentine units of measurement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Argentine units of measurement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentine units of measurement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk _YO! 12:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Statistical districts of Malta

A tag has been placed on Category:Statistical districts of Malta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Regions of El Salvador

A tag has been placed on Category:Regions of El Salvador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:W3.CSS concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:W3.CSS, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Pure.css concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pure.css, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Moment.js concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Moment.js, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP GRC concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP GRC, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Information Design Tool concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Information Design Tool, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Sales and Distribution concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Sales and Distribution, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Cost Center Accounting concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Cost Center Accounting, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:TestLodge concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:TestLodge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Material Design Lite concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Material Design Lite, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Cloud for Customer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Cloud for Customer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Materialize (framework) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Materialize (framework), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Production Planning concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Production Planning, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Plant Maintenance concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Plant Maintenance, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:RequireJS concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:RequireJS, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Koa.js concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Koa.js, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Aurelia (framework) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aurelia (framework), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apache Spark SQL concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apache Spark SQL, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Business Workflow concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Business Workflow, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP Project System concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP Project System, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SAP FICO concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:SAP FICO, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 4, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 4, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:PySpark concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:PySpark, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 3, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 3, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Türkmenbaşy şäheri concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Türkmenbaşy şäheri, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Second Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Second Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 5, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 5, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Fourth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fourth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Inner Islands (Seychelles) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Inner Islands (Seychelles), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Seventh Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Seventh Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Rioja Media concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rioja Media, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 7, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 7, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Sixth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sixth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Eighth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eighth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:PouchDB concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:PouchDB, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apache HCatalog concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apache HCatalog, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apache Tajo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apache Tajo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ninth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ninth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Power View concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Power View, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 8, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 8, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Seaborn (software library) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Seaborn (software library), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Kristiansta District Court concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kristiansta District Court, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Third Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Third Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 2, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 2, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:District 6, Melilla concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:District 6, Melilla, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Fifth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fifth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dc.js concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dc.js, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Spring JDBC concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spring JDBC, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apache Commons IO concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apache Commons IO, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Spring Web Services concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spring Web Services, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apache Commons Collections concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apache Commons Collections, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Java Debugger concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Java Debugger, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apache Commons CLI concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apache Commons CLI, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Spring Boot CLI concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Spring Boot CLI, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bulma (framework) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bulma (framework), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apache Spark SQL

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apache Spark SQL".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Project System

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Project System".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Production Planning

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Production Planning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Plant Maintenance

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Plant Maintenance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Sales and Distribution

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Sales and Distribution".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Information Design Tool

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Information Design Tool".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP GRC

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP GRC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP FICO

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP FICO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Cost Center Accounting

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Cost Center Accounting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Cloud for Customer

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Cloud for Customer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SAP Business Workflow

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SAP Business Workflow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:TestLodge

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TestLodge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:W3.CSS

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "W3.CSS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RequireJS

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RequireJS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pure.css

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pure.css".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moment.js

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moment.js".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Materialize (framework)

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Materialize".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Material Design Lite

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Material Design Lite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Koa.js

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Koa.js".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dc.js

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dc.js".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Aurelia (framework)

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aurelia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Third Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Third Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 23:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fifth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fifth Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 23:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Inner Islands (Seychelles)

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inner Islands".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Seventh Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seventh Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eighth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eighth Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fourth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fourth Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Second Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Second Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ninth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ninth Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sixth Electoral District, British Virgin Islands

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sixth Electoral District".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 11:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Türkmenbaşy şäheri

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Türkmenbaşy şäheri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apache Commons IO

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apache Commons IO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 09:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apache Tajo

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apache Tajo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:PySpark

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PySpark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apache HCatalog

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apache HCatalog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Seaborn (software library)

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seaborn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 00:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rioja Media

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rioja Media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 2, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 3, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 4, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 5, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 5".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 6, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 6".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 7, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 7".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 8, Melilla

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 8".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kristiansta District Court

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kristiansta District Court".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:PouchDB

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PouchDB".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Power View

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Power View".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Region IV, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region IV, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Region V, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region V, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Region II, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region II, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Region III, East Timor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Region III, East Timor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bulma (framework)

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bulma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Spring Web Services

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spring Web Services".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Spring Boot CLI

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spring Boot CLI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apache Commons CLI

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apache Commons CLI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apache Commons Collections

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apache Commons Collections".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Java Debugger

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Java Debugger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Spring JDBC

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spring JDBC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Binding Properties Pattern.png

The file File:Binding Properties Pattern.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Ash-Shūbak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ash-Shūbak. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shoubak. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shoubak. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CrazyBoy826 19:02, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Please merge wikipedia items on wikidata concerning Timor-leste subdistricts

see https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q61698964&redirect=no Germartin1 (talk) 13:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Region II, East Timor

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Region II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Region V, East Timor

Hello, Shevonsilva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Region V".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Populated places in Quneitra District

A tag has been placed on Category:Populated places in Quneitra District requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leeshiv

The article Leeshiv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no such region of Madhya Pradesh

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aspose API

The article Aspose API has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No credible claim of notability; serves only to promote the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Graduate Prospects for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graduate Prospects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graduate Prospects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Graduate Prospects logo 2018.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Graduate Prospects logo 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dongbu District, Zhongshan

The article Dongbu District, Zhongshan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It seems that no reliable source could prove that there is such a district exist in Zhongshan, Guangdong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamerBlue (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zhongxin District

The article Zhongxin District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It seems that no reliable source could prove that there is such a district exist in Zhongshan, Guangdong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamerBlue (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Xibei District

The article Xibei District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It seems that no reliable source could prove that there is such a district exist in Zhongshan, Guangdong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamerBlue (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nanbu District

The article Nanbu District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It seems that no reliable source could prove that there is such a district exist in Zhongshan, Guangdong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamerBlue (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dongbei District

The article Dongbei District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It seems that no reliable source could prove that there is such a district exist in Zhongshan, Guangdong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamerBlue (talk) 05:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nanbu District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nanbu District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanbu District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DreamerBlue (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Xibei District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xibei District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xibei District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DreamerBlue (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dongbei District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dongbei District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dongbei District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DreamerBlue (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dongbu District, Zhongshan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dongbu District, Zhongshan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dongbu District, Zhongshan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DreamerBlue (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Zhongxin District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhongxin District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhongxin District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DreamerBlue (talk) 12:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Zones of Mauritius

A tag has been placed on Category:Zones of Mauritius indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tejgaon Circle Upazila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tejgaon Circle Upazila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejgaon Circle Upazila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sun8908 _Talk 05:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tejgaon Circle Upazila

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Tejgaon Circle Upazila. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Willy1018(talk) 06:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Naragati Thana

The article Naragati Thana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejgaon Circle Upazila, notability and verifiability are not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 16:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

"Pinterest Marketing" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pinterest Marketing and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 21#Pinterest Marketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DownTownRich (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Intercepting filter pattern class diagram.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Intercepting filter pattern class diagram.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

File:Intercepting filter pattern sequence diagram.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Intercepting filter pattern sequence diagram.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gldani-Nadzaladevi District

The article Gldani-Nadzaladevi District has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Such District does not exist. There are two different Districts with that name: Gldani District and Nadzaladevi District

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarai Kharbooza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sarai Kharbooza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.dawn.com/news/1395928. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- EN-Jungwon 12:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

"Savo-Mar" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Savo-Mar and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 9#Savo-Mar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Chilinda District for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chilinda District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chilinda District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GeographicAccountant (talk) 18:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zamzam, Libya

The article Zamzam, Libya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub article of settlement with no obvious significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of EasyMock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EasyMock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyMock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--WikiLinuz (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Framework7 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Framework7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Framework7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Northern Moonlight 00:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Keel (unit) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keel (unit) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keel (unit) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C F A 💬 20:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)