User talk:Skeptabbk

February 2016

Hello, I'm Krj373. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Skepta has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jme (MC). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Skepta, you may be blocked from editing. Mojoworker (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Friend. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge

Consider becoming a positive Wikipedia contributor. Buster Seven Talk 16:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Grant Leadbitter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 16:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)