Jump to content

User talk:TheRedundancy125

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, TheRedundancy125, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for behaving in a way that is not compatible with a collaborative project. Multiple other editors have warned you about problems with your editing on this talk page. Removing these messages is a signal that you have read and understood them, so ignoring the warnings and continuing the same behaviour is disruptive. We are a collaborative project and we would prefer to talk to you about these problems and find a resolution, but since you have entirely refused to communicate with other editors, a block is the only option at this point.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Joe (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #38561 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRedundancy125 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My account is blocked because to that user who did it, the reason why i was tying to make a better editing on different topics on the site. Not some users who trying to make copyright issues, i decided ignore them to make the editing right. I'm apologized the problem to all previous users. TheRedundancy125 (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft a reasonable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not modify (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are free to make a new unblock request; see WP:GAB to understand how to do so. --Yamla (talk) 14:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly TheRedundancy125, going by these unblock appeals, it doesn't seem like your English is good enough to contribute to the English Wikipedia effectively. Have you considered editing the Wikipedia in your native language? – Joe (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRedundancy125 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want my Wiki account to be unblocked 11:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, you will need to tell us what you did wrong, how you act differently in the future, and describe the productive contributions you wish to make. As this request does not do these things, I am declining it. If English is not your primary language, you may feel more comfortable contributing to the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. 331dot (talk) 12:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRedundancy125 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My reason why, my account blocked so i'm trying and i apologize the problems to the other editor users about my editing and this need to be unblock the account. 12:41, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you waste our time with another unblock request that does not specifically address why you were blocked and what kind of edits you'll make in the future, you will lose the ability to edit this talk page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Lost Boys (2020 TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Lost Boys (2020 TV series). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 27#The Lost Boys (2020 TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ★Trekker (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"ΛVP: Alien vs. Predator" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ΛVP: Alien vs. Predator. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 2#ΛVP: Alien vs. Predator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wrong Turn (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wrong Turn (upcoming film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 12#Wrong Turn (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Off the Rails (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 5 § Off the Rails (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wedding Crashers

[edit]

Template:Wedding Crashers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Single White Female

[edit]

Template:Single White Female has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 16:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ice Castles

[edit]

Template:Ice Castles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]