User talk:ThisMr

April 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Prabhloch Singh, from its old location at User:ThisMr/sandbox/Prabhloch Singh. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Prabhloch Singh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prabhloch Singh. Thanks! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prabhloch Singh (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prabhloch Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 04:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ThisMr, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 04:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Prabhloch Singh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prabhloch Singh. Thanks! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prabhloch Singh (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prabhloch Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Prabhloch Singh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Prabhloch Singh. Thanks! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prabhloch Singh (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not encourage resubmitting this again as simply none of this suggests better for the applicable notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prabhloch Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prabhloch Singh

Hello, ThisMr. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Prabhloch Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Anmolbhat (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prabhloch Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prabhloch Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. Katie^talk 18:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and will keep this in mind for future. My intention was only to highlight that the user in question was reaching out to religious leaders after creating their Wiki pages, claiming credit for creation. Then how is the user being anonymous in the first place? Thank you.ThisMr (talk) 19:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry

Don't use your IP[1] for edit warring again and read WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, abusing IP or another account for making same edits on same article is prohibited. Capitals00 (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you used any other account(s) other than this one? If so, can you please say exactly what accounts you have used. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 07:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no. I did happen to not login by mistake but that's it. Hope this helps.ThisMr (talk) 17:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know user MisterSlow? who was registered a month after your AfC submission was rejected for the third time and he then created the same article in mainspace, also can you please explain where you get this image of the subject from? Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 17:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ThisMr. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Prabhloch Singh, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Manmohan Singh for their contributions to Wikipedia.

MfD nomination of Book:Prabhloch Singh

Book:Prabhloch Singh, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Prabhloch Singh and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Book:Prabhloch Singh during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 21:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]