Jump to content

User talk:Tuesday13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello. Per our IRC conversation, you mistakenly put: {{subst-AFC submission/submit}}

The correct template is: {{subst:AFC submission/submit}}

Use a colon not a dash. If you did it correctly a yellow box should appear at the top of the page saying 'Review pending'.--ObsidinSoul 17:37, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interface Focus. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GFOLEY FOUR15:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interface Focus. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 18:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

i dont know what exactly I need to change on my apge is there a part that needs referencing. The last reviwer quoted 'We're sorry, but we cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please cite reliable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed so the information can be verified and to establish the notability of the topic.' but did not refer to the point to which this refers, can you help?

thanks.

Tuesday13 (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tuesday13. Please take a look at other articles in Wikipedia. Notice that they have a References section. That is actually a required part of every article. Without that articles can be deleted at any time. Original research is unacceptable in Wikipedia, and all information must be Verifiable from independent and reliable sources. The presence of enough third party reliable sources are also the means of proving Notability (i.e. 'Should Wikipedia have an article on this?'). Since you are writing about an organization, make sure it meets at least one of the criteria listed here and then prove it by showing us in the references used. Subjects which are not notable should not have an article in Wikipedia, so it's necessary to prove notability beforehand. For a tutorial on how to add references please see the following tutorial: Referencing for Beginners.
If you have any questions please contact me in my talk page or return to our live help chat as you have done before. Thank you.--ObsidinSoul 17:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


hi,

im basing this new page on some of our other pages which as you can see do not have a reference section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proceedings_of_the_Royal_Society http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_the_Royal_Society_Interface

its not clear what I can provide to proove that this is a valid article.

Tuesday13 (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

see above

Tuesday13 (talk) 15:14, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Interface Focus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pol430 talk to me 20:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interface Focus. Please do not recreate this article, as it was composed mainly of copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Pol430 talk to me 20:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tuesday13 (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

please tell me how I can prove that I am the author of the text in my wiki page. I work for the journal I worte the homepage and I am using only parts of that text for the wiki page. This is infuriating. thanks,

Tuesday13 (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, for legal reasons, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and infringements are speedily deleted or otherwise redacted. If you are the copyright owner, it is possible to authorise Wikipedia to use the material, but this authority must be formally given before the article is created. Please visit the page Wikipedia:Contact us/Permit for more information on how to do this. You may also wish to read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Pol430 talk to me 09:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and some issues were found because of which it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interface_Focus. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Wikipedian2 (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interface Focus, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Interface Focus

[edit]

Hello Tuesday13. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Interface Focus.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interface Focus}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 09:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]