User talk:Tveol1091

stop

stop vandalizing Turkiishh (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John II of France. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eric ^talk 15:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Louis XVII, you may be blocked from editing. Eric ^talk 15:41, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ludwig II of Bavaria, you may be blocked from editing. Eric ^talk 16:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You seem to have resumed your campaign, despite it still being under discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Infoboxes#Replacement_of_signature_images_with_svg_derivations. I suggest you slow down. Eric ^talk 13:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

svg signature campaign

Hello- In the six weeks you have been on Wikipedia, you have conducted a campaign to change the signatures in the infoboxes of articles on historical figures to svg versions, changes which in many if not all cases do not constitute improvements, and each time with no helpful edit summary, nor any discussion. Such sweeping changes should be discussed in the community before being implemented. Taking the signature of Hugues Capet as an example: An image of the original signature as it appears on a 10th-century parchment (below left) is preferable to the artificial, stylized derivation with which you replaced the original (below right).

image of signature on historical parchment
svg derivation from original image

Please slow down and take the time to learn how collaboration works on Wikipedia; you could start at Help:Getting_started. And please always explain your edits: Help:Edit summary. Eric ^talk 15:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tveol1091: Thanks for your contributions but you must stop and obtain consensus before making any further signature changes. You will be blocked if they continue without clear consensus from other editors at WT:WikiProject Infoboxes#Replacement of signature images with svg derivations or a suitable noticeboard. Johnuniq (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of Wikipedia for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the explanation above and at WT:WikiProject Infoboxes#Replacement of signature images with svg derivations (permalink). Attempting to impose a fait accompli by changing multiple articles when other editors have objected is highly disruptive. You are able to comment on other pages and start dispute resolution regarding the problem. The issue of whether signatures of historical figures should be replaced with an improved drawing must be resolved via community discussion, not edit warring such as has occurred at Frederick the Great (11:57, 20 February 2024 + 00:52, 25 February 2024 + 10:31, 27 February 2024). Johnuniq (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]