User talk:Virgil Lasis

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Virgil Lasis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 10:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Holocaust

Hello. I notice that you've reverted my categorization of this article from Category:Anti-communism back to Category:Communism. Have a browse through the two categories, and I think you'll agree that Category:Anti-communism is the more appropriate category for this article. Note that the article Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation you've linked to is also in this category. Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. Virgil Lasis (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mass killings under Communist regimes

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mass killings under Communist regimes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. The Four Deuces (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have replied to this template by putting a warning on my talk page. Pleae note that I have only made one change, so it does not amount to edit-warring. I find it offenseive that you would place this notice on my talk page. The Four Deuces (talk) 15:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have started an edit-war by removing sourced content without any explanation. I, on the other hand, have explained my edits on the talk page. Virgil Lasis (talk) 15:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of my comments

Stop removing my comments on the Occupation of the Baltic states talkpage (here and here). ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 20:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove your comments intentionally. I was editing my own comments. That was likely the result of one of the edit conflicts, I'm not quite sure how it happened. Virgil Lasis (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An edit conflict warning appears above the editing window whilst editing, but I see you are editing the whole page, not just the section, perhaps that was the influence. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 20:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Proposed deletion of Red Holocaust (2009 book)

The article Red Holocaust (2009 book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notability: lack of significant discussion of the text as a sociological work in its own right (absence of sources); compare to Making of the English Working Class or The Bible

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Der rote Holocaust und die Deutschen

The article Der rote Holocaust und die Deutschen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notability: lack of significant discussion of the text as a sociological work in its own right (absence of sources); compare to Making of the English Working Class or The Bible

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fifelfoo (talk) 08:39, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Rosefielde

The article Steven Rosefielde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sourced, no evidence of notability, no evidence of academic notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Capitalismojo (talk) 23:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Communist holocaust" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Communist holocaust and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 27#Communist holocaust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]