User talk:WaussusBeaver

Welcome

Welcome!

WaussusBeaver, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WaussusBeaver! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

WaussusBeaver

WaussusBeaver, you are not welcome here at Wikipedia. your constant pushing for Draft: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch is tiring and you should drop dead.22:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)22:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)22:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)~

Materialscientist, is there a way to know who wrote this? I do not believe it is acceptable. versacespace talk to me 02:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VersaceSpace, WaussusBeaver posted it themselves. Check the page history: They added it here. A search for the phrase 'your constant pushing for' has only five results, the others being entirely unrelated. It's possible that WaussusBeaver was reposting something that has since been deleted elsewhere, but for whatever reason, they chose to do so. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BlackcurrantTea thank you. may i ask how u got here? versacespace talk to me 05:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

VersaceSpace, your talk page is on my watchlist; the user posted on your talk page, and seemed a bit confused. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye

Maybe you're right. I got cocky, and now I guess i'll leave. I never was all that good from the start. goodbye.

Your changes to Calvin and Hobbes

I have reverted your changes to Calvin and Hobbes. Wikipedia content should be written from a neutral point of view and based on reliable sources. This edit, referring to a 'last great strip', which will 'remain loved for centuries to come' is not neutral. The 'series overview' table was sourced solely to a Reddit post, which is user-generated content. It is not a reliable source. Please review the guideline on reliable sources and the neutral point of view policy and follow them. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 07:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Houston,illinois, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

EN-Jungwon 09:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:WaussusBeaver

A tag has been placed on User:WaussusBeaver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cordless Larry (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nyerere Ogbonna

You just commented that this article Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna does not suit Wikipedia's need. Already the article has been declined twice and I am working on a plan to resolve issues raised by previous reviewers which led to its rejection. Do you mean I should not improve on this article or how do you mean by your comment? How many times can an article be rejected before it is nominated for speedy delection?Nwachinazo (talk) 14:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WaussusBeaver's comment has been removed, Nwachinazo. If you have questions about Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna, I suggest asking Theroadislong or Celestina007, who are experienced editors who have reviewed the draft. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:WaussusBeaver

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:WaussusBeaver, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shinyedit^bonjour. 15:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, and persistent unconstructive editing of various kinds.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.