User talk:Yosri

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

Dersonlwd Talk 11:41, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Dear Yosri:

Regarding the page Aztecs, the name "Tlacalel" is a misspelling for "Tlacaelel". Please take this into account for your Bahasa Melayu page.

I will be glad to help you further on this or other things related to Mexico.

Greetings.

Trujaman 04:29, 24 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Protecting a Page

I need your help to protect the article of Italy national football team with autoconfirmed mode without dateline to prevent frequent vandalism. Thank you for your cooperation. Irfanshaharuddin (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Vasco da Gama

An article that you've edited before (Vasco da Gama) is nominated for Article Improvement Drive. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. Gameiro 02:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:gfdl

Gratitude

Thankyou so much Yosri for your brilliant translation effort!

I am very grateful.

May you prosper!

(If you ever need any articles to be translated to the Chinese or Taiwanese language, then I would gladly help you).

Best Wishes, from --Jose77 23:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Halal Article

I recently saw your addition to the Halal article. I believe using the "urine argument" in the article is inappropriate for various reasons:

A. I cannot find any verifable and reputable source which mentions your argument (aka no citation). This leads me to believe that perhaps it is an argument you have created on your own (WP Policy: No Original Research).

B. The parallel to urine is implicitly stating that the urine is haram, which again needs a citation if the assertion is true

C. And if it the assertion is true that urine is haram, it is assuming prior reader knowledge of that.

For these reasons, I find your 'urine argument" addition to the halal article inappropriate and am reverting your changes. If you would like to reinsert the statement, please first find a source which mentions that urine is haram, and also find a source which mentions the argument itself. No hard feelings.Starwarp2k2 22:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You bring up a valid argument. I urge you to find a source for this statement you wrote on my talk page, it brings up a very salient point- "What is not seen is not totally gone" and then include that and it's source in the Halal article in a NPOV fashion. Thanks for not taking my revert personally.Starwarp2k2 16:17, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"What is not seen is not totally gone" is common logic and fairly obvious. But in wikipedia, you cannot use assume the reader follows your/any logic. Following that train of thought, you have to quote a source that uses/explains this logic and say "look! that is what this theory says" etc...

And about your comment regarding the type of halal which doesn't require the ritual slaughtering but just requires recitation prior to consumption, there are definately people who follow that. I have sourced that statement on the Halal page.Starwarp2k2 17:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying my friend, but your opinion (nor my opinion) regardless of how valid or invalid, cannot be passed on to a wikipedia article. Each definition of halal which a significant constituency adheres to must be present in the wikipedia article. It cannot be removed just because me or you or another website doen't agree with it, because someone else does agree.Starwarp2k2 15:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to repeat myself but you leave me with no option. Wikipedia's job is not to figure out which viewpoint is right, but rather to list ALL the significant ones and neutrally write what they have to say about each other.Starwarp2k2 05:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your skepticism fully. I myself am very skeptical on which sources I use. The site which I included no longer works, so I included another different citation. It is not a state-sponsored website, but it is still credible. It is a website which echoes the distinction between "zabiha" and "halal, essentially the argument which we are referring to. Read commentary for 179. Not only does this website say what I wrote on the article, I also personally know many people who follow that definition of halal.Starwarp2k2 03:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source was removed from the article. I am talking with the person who removed it. [[1]].Starwarp2k2 16:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We're going in circles. Just because you don't beleive it doesn't mean alot of other people don't beleive it. And if they do, it needs to be mentioned in wikipedia.Starwarp2k2 19:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We should definately talk about Islamic law and what Islam says is "halal", but there are differing opinions on Islamic law and what Islam deems as halal.Starwarp2k2 16:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What you consider to be Islamic Law is not necessarily the same as what everyone else considers to be Islamic Law. If a significant group beleive a certain thing (as they do), than it must be mentioned in the article.Starwarp2k2 19:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know of the specifics regarding what the four madhabs of Sunni Islam say, but please stop generalizing. All Muslims don't strictly follow any one of the four madhabs, and have their own beleifs. And there is a significant number of people, especially in non-Muslim-majority countries, who follow the various types of halals that are currently in the article and that warrants their mention in the article. I am not referring to a radical view, I am referring to a view that is accepted by a large quantity of people. What is large? I don't know...and the chances of being able to assign/find a number to "large" are very slim.Starwarp2k2 01:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not generalizing by saying that "Muslims beleive this". I wrote "Some" beleive this. I used that terminology because people from all divisions of Islam can hold this opinion. The opinion is not restricted to any single school of thought, thus the word "some".Starwarp2k2 16:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great!Starwarp2k2 13:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peace be upon him (Islam)

Yosri, I noticed you did some work on the Peace be upon him article a long time back. I was hoping you could look into the article now. People are saying some strange things that no one uses sallallahu alayhi wa salaam for the Prophet anymore but instead use subhanahu wa ta'ala. Moreover, they are saying that mentioning the Prophet also entails sending salaah upon his family. Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. ZaydHammoudeh 18:34, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Danish boycott, on your userpage

Out of curiosity, why are you boycotting Danish products and, by extension, Denmark, though your condemnation extends only to a particular newspaper that happens to be Danish? Specifically, what do other businesses in Denmark (some of which have opposed that publication, and some of which have no idea about that publication) have to do with that article published by one newspaper? IgorSF 10:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned above, this is merely personal curiosity. Having heard the "boycott Danish" rhetorics from many different sources, I'm intrigued by the reasoning behind it. However, if you object to this post, and want it removed, I'll do that upon your request, or feel free to remove it yourself if you wish.IgorSF 10:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was never any apology for the above said incident and the incident was precalculated to insure Muslim wrath (They want to know how much reaction it will attract. - ‘‘its carry death penalty”). Danish government only apologies that some people felt hurt by it. This is not full apology, indicating they (the government) approve it. To purchase is, therefore to compromised one’s own faith. Yosri 06:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. I understand this reasoning, but still feel somewhat puzzled by it. I would understand it much better if it was the case that Danish government had any influence on the newspaper in question. While I haven't studied either that incident or Danish political system in any detail, I assume that - as in most Western democracies - in Denmark, the government has little or no influence on that newspaper. So even if they wanted to shut it down for the publication, or otherwise punish it, they simply can't. Moreover, they - the government - may not feel like they owe any apology because they - the government - didn't do anything. The newspaper did, and the newspaper may be seen by some as owing an apology to Muslims - a view that, although controversial, is much easier to understand. But the government, lacking control or influence on the newspaper, and having done nothing to cause the publication, nor having the power to do anything to undo its effects, may genuinely be seen as having no cause for an apology. IgorSF 09:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, as I understand, your boycott extends to all businesses operating in the country, which includes a great number of companies with widely different views. Some of them have no doubt supported the publications, while other were neutral (and some, no doubt, didn't even know or care), and still others share your disgust for the publication. Moreover, certainly in a country as big as Denmark, there are businesses owned by Muslims, whose feelings about the publication, in all likelihood, are as strong as, or even stronger than, yours. But those businesses are also affected by the boycott. IgorSF 09:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because the issue is so controversial, and the potential for misunderstanding is likewise very high, I'd like to reaffirm what was stated above - these messages are arising from personal curiosity, and carry no bad will. Nor is this curiosity limited to the reactions of Muslims and Islam, either; a very similar event (a particular entity has made a particular decision, and many people, in great anger, decided to boycott not only that entity, but all businesses in the same geographical area) occurred several years ago in the USA. IgorSF 09:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I guess that explains the reaction toward the government of Denmark, but I still don't see the basis for such reaction against the private companies in Denmark, although one can make the argument that the citizens of a country elect its government, and as such, are responsible for its decisions. In any case, thanks for the reply. IgorSF 11:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's me! Wow, it seems that you're still angry towards those cartoons, so you still don't change to something else... right? --Edmund the King of the Woods! 16:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not the question of emotional. I don't change my principal just to please others. They have their principal, I keep mine. Yosri 06:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't mean changing your principal, but editing your own userpage here. I see your userpage here is all about the cartoon controversy. Btw I saw an InterWiki link on top of your userpage here, linking to an image you've uploaded in the Malay Wikipedia. Do you mean to put that link in the lower left side of the interface? If you want the link to appear within the content of the page, it should be

ms:Imej:YosriBolaTakraw.jpg

Wonder whether you really know how to make InterWiki links... :-P --Edmund the King of the Woods! 10:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider

In some detail the policy issues at WP:NOT

Your edit at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hikayat_Iskandar_Zulkarnain

Is a classic example. WP Mainspsace is not a library list, directory or library catalogue or bibliography location.

Please in WP:AGF - either re-write it in convention with WP:MOS. In time if there has been no change it will be reverted - probably by others less likely to even discuss the matter.

Thank you Satu Suro 07:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Not to sure what you are saying - but please note this in an online encyclopedia and regardless - WP:MOS requires articles to be laid out a certain way - your addition of material the way you did is not correct format and needed to be changed.

Please help improve wikipedia by (a) understanding what WP:NOT means (b) keeping to the guidelines of WP:MOS thank you Satu Suro 23:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - if you understand me at all - we need to keep the format in line with other articles - it was an eccentric addition of information - it needed cleaning up - cheers Satu Suro 05:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources...

With particular reference to the Indon article, I hope you are familiar WP:SYNTH and WP:PRIMARY. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mind taking a look at my question on Talk:Kris?

You seem to be a first-hand expert on the subject, Sir. Would you mind helping me improve the article by responding to my question? I thank you deeply for your time and expertise. Bullzeye ^contribs 00:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jill Whelan (Vicki).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jill Whelan (Vicki).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yasir Afifi for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Yasir Afifi, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasir Afifi until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is just as an aside: I am cool :)... I agree with you that this incident is outrageous, but I'd much rather read (and maybe write) about the upcoming "Afifi vs. the United States of America". I'm almost certain that's gonna happen. Cheers! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 10:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article IPad, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Terrillja _talk 20:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's continue this discussion here. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 20:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Sindrom Morquio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Sindrom Morquio. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Morquio syndrome. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Morquio syndrome - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 22:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anura and Sagarika Bhattacharya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anura and Sagarika Bhattacharya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yosri. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 17:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yosri. You have new messages at Pharaoh of the Wizards's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bonnet macaque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Python (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

taste

Hi. Your edits are confusing taste with flavor. Flavor is more complicated, and includes taste as part. So the information you have added does not belong in the taste article. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly not. Flavor is perisa in Malay. http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ms&u=http://www.dbp.gov.my/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Ddbp%2Bdewan%26hl%3Den%26tbo%3Dd%26gl%3DGB%26source%3Dandroid-browser&sa=X&ei=E1ScUKCcJ4yurAeQqYDYBw&ved=0CDIQ7gEwAA Yosri (talk) 00:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taste, in English, is sensory input that comes from taste buds on the tongue. The fact that Malay has a similar word with a broader definition is not relevant. Words often don't match perfectly across languages. Looie496 (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ganeshbot

Hi Yosri, Have you checked out the CSVLoader for AWB? If you have the village/town data available in CSV, it will be easy to create the stub articles using the CSVLoader. Please check it out and let me know if you have any questions. — Ganeshk (talk) 04:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ganeshbot/Census2001 is not current. There has been another census in 2011. Indian government has been reluctant to freely publish the latest 2011 data. Please post at India noticeboard about this; may be someone else will know where to find the latest data. — Ganeshk (talk) 13:35, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yosri. You have new messages at Xeltran's talk page.
Message added 16:49, 9 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Yosri. You have new messages at Xeltran's talk page.
Message added 16:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kunlun, Malay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malagasy and East African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting other editors

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Soy sauce. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 11:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This issue is being discussed at Talk:Soy_sauce#Hyponatremia; please join the conversation there, and try to assume good faith of why other editors are reverting your changes to the lede. We are not a cabal paid by a soy sauce company to censor health issues. --McGeddon (talk) 11:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re:MS Awazisan Maru

Hello Yosri. I'm afraid you've misunderstood the prefixes. Firstly, MS doesn't stand for Malaysian Ship, it stands for Motor Ship. So it doesn't denote nationality at all. Secondly the prefix IJN isn't used by Wikipedia at all. If we were to give said ship a military prefix, that would be "Japanese transport", not IJN. Hope that clears things up. Manxruler (talk) 08:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2009 Pendet controversy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned photo of Bujang Valley?

Hi Yosri.

I found you as the author of Bujang Valley. Maybe you could help me in identifying an orphaned photo. The description is in Tamil language which I cannot read. Somebody put it into the category "Khmer ruins in Thailand" which I find very unlikely.

While researching with Google I found similar structures as in this photo on pages that deal with Bujang Valley. Could you possibly confirm that?

Greetings. --hdamm (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yosri, I thank you very much, your help is really appreciated. --hdamm (talk) 11:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Amcorp Mall page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Bannockburn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is that the article did not stated it as Carlisle Castle / Carlisle town. I let who ever follow the link to decide. Yosri (talk) 12:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Margaux94 1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Margaux94 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Moscato d'Asti.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Moscato d'Asti.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quantum of Solace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wade. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yosri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yosri. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album Ella Rama2 Malaysia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Album Ella Rama2 Malaysia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Parbhani

Hello,
You used  to remove some information from the infobox of Parbhani. But you did not provide any details at all. Kindly provide your reasoning. —usernamekiran (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate. Yosri (talk) 08:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Album Ella Rama2 Malaysia.jpg

The file File:Album Ella Rama2 Malaysia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Ella (Malaysian singer)#Discography. Non-free cover art is generally considered acceptable as the primary means of identification in a stand-alone article about the work in question, but a much stronger justification is required in other articles as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3. Since this particular album cover is not being used in the main infobox as its non-free use rationale claims and is not itself the subject of any sourced commentary with in the article, the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permohonan pembukaan sekat

Salam, Yosri.

Mohon maaf meminta bantuan Anda melalui en.wikipedia dan menggunakan bahasa Indonesia. Beberapa waktu lalu, saya tidak sengaja membuat halaman baru bertema desa di Provinsi Aceh di ms.wikipedia yang seharusnya tidak ditujukan untuk ditulis di ms.wikipedia. Oleh karena itu, saya segera menandainya dengan tag hapus agar penyelia dapat menghapusnya. Namun, saya malah disekat selama 3 bulan di ms.wikipedia dengan alasan memberikan maklumat palsu. Sebagai pertimbangan Anda, saya pada saat itu tidak berencana untuk membuat/memberikan maklumat palsu di Wikipedia Melayu, itu semata-mata hanya kesilapan saya saja karena keliru. Mohon bantuan Anda mempertimbangkan untuk membuka sekat atas akun saya. Terima kasih sekali. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 15:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done on 23. Yosri (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Surakarta.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indonesian Institute of the Arts, Surakarta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yosri. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the blocking of my account on the Malaysian Wikipedia.

Assalamualaikum, and a very good morning I bid to you, sir or madam.

I would like to wonder, regarding as to why you have blocked my account on the Bahasa Melayu Wikipedia. According to the Wikipedia article regarding the list of policies, under the Deletion subheading, rule 2, also known as the Criteria for speedy deletion subsubheading states that:

Articles, images, categories etc. may be "speedily deleted" if they clearly fall within certain categories, which generally boil down to pages lacking content, or disruptive pages. Anything potentially controversial should go through the deletion process instead.

As you have seen from my editing history, the multiple articles that I have posted the "speedy deletion" request onto are articles which heavily lack content, and are therefore eligible and fall under rule 2.

Continuing with the Wikipedia article regarding the deletion policy, under the Reasons for deletion subheading, it states that:

Content that meets at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion

And as I have stated earlier, all of the articles above fall under the criteria for speedy deletion. Another thing that I would like to point out is the redundancy of most of the articles that I have posted the "speedy deletion" request onto. Most of them are easily able to be merged into bigger articles.

Thank you, and have a nice day.

DualSidedHiiro (talk) 16:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

Hello Yosri, I hope you unblock me at ms.wiki as I’m unable to editing at ms.wiki just now. I don’t have any intentions to do vandalisms there because I see that there are no blocking notifictaion at my user contributions. So I really hope to unblock me. Best regards, TQ.–Fandi89 (talk) 06:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yosri. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

Hi Yosri. I hope you can unblock me at ms.wikipedia because I'm a new user there Al hafiz 747 (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sekolah Menengah Sains Tengku Muhammad Faris Petra badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sekolah Menengah Sains Tengku Muhammad Faris Petra badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]