Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.VQA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Westwood Studios . (non-admin closure) --Mdann52talk to me! 07:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.VQA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Notability not established by multiple reliable independent sources. — Keφr 09:02, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I am not sure what notability guideline applies to file extensions, but I generally favor retaining these factual pages; their absence does more harm (by omission) than their presence. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a link in the nomination. — Keφr 04:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Gee, thanks. But practically every topic on Wikipedia has more specific notability guidelines than GNG and I can't seem to find under which one "file extensions" would be. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Come on, don't be so lazy, it's pretty obvious he's asking you to expand your stance a bit. Sergecross73 msg me 00:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Westwood Studios since it is their in-house file format. No evidence of notability (it's covered in various directories of file formats but nothing substantial to show why it's noteworthy). --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.