Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Annual D.I.C.E Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences . Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1st Annual D.I.C.E Awards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Total absence of evidence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences - The facts are correct and notable but already discussed in the awarding entity's article and this split is entirely unneeded. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Total absence of evidence? Try Googling "D.I.C.E Awards". There is an important distinction that should be drawn between what some believe to be the WP:V threshold ("all information must be verified") and the actual WP:V threshold ("all information must be verifiable"). We don't remove content because it isn't perfect. We improve it if we can. See also WP:BEFORE. -Thibbs (talk) 12:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Sal - this is essentially an unnecessary WP:CFORK of the AIAS article, and besides, it wasn't even known as the DICE Awards back then. ansh666 04:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - The deletion nomination, as Thibbs points out, doesn't make any sense, but I also agree with the sentiment that this was a split that didn't need to happen. Sergecross73 msg me 15:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.