Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Eastleigh F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2011–12 Eastleigh F.C. season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The cut-off point for individual articles on English club seasons is the Conference National. Vast majority of references are from Easleigh's own website. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 15:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not only below the traditional cut-off point at WP:FOOTY, but also fails GNG. Giant Snowman 13:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I dont understand what the problem is with keeping this. It is relevant to Eastleigh football club, I've written it so it is factual, rather than including any opinion, and to say the own club's website is not a reliable source of information for information on itself is puzzling to say the least. The whole point about wikipedia is to expand and provide people with information. It's not like this article is half started/finished.User:GrimReaper66 19:27, 12 August 2012 (GMT)
Keep - As there is a well-sourced prose, I was going to say that this article passes WP:NSEASONS, but that was before I read "Articles can be created on individual seasons of teams in top professional leagues". However, giving the large number of season-statistics that is only a list of stats without any prose, I would rather want the football-project to get rid of those, then to get rid of season-articles on a club playing in the "wrong league". Mentoz86 (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I consider that we should show some flexibility in our decision-making in cases where well-referenced and informative work has been undertaken as in the case of this article. League Octopus (League Octopus 10:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.