Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abahlali baseMjondolo (membership & structures)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Abahlali baseMjondolo. I'm guessing that this is the redirect participants were thinking of since no one here specified a particular target article despite my request to identify a target page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abahlali baseMjondolo (membership & structures)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without actually addressing the concern which was "this page seems redundant given that there is a full page on the organisation"

Delete or redirect at the very least Gbawden (talk) 06:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make into redirect and merge The article in short enough, no need for another article that can be a section. Roost^T_C(please ping me when replying) 09:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and South Africa. Shellwood (talk) 11:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect more WP:UNDUE coverage of a minor organisation Park3r (talk) 08:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please specify the redirect or merge target you are proposing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, per above; no indication that this topic is separately notable from the main article and the volume of content does not seem to warrant a spinout page. jp×g 06:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment re "Deprodded without actually addressing the concern" - well I did say "needs fuller discussion given most of page was deleted last year" when deprodding it Mujinga (talk) 11:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.