Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ade Ivan Hafilah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ade Ivan Hafilah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who has spent his entire career playing in semi-pro leagues with no apparent claim to notability. I will do a source analysis to explain why I believe that the current sourcing falls short on WP:GNG. An Indonesian search came back with nothing better so I am confident that the current sources show the best coverage. FlashScore and Football Database confirm the WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source analysis - falls short on WP:GNG, please see below comments Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://spiritnews.co.id/2017/03/20/ini-alasan-ade-ivan-kembali-berkostum-persika/		~ The best source by far, however, even here it only briefly discusses his career and confirms that he is a striker. Aside from that, there are three small quotes from him.	~ Partial
https://www.indosport.com/sepakbola/amp/20190702/hasil-liga-2-2019-psms-medan-vs-cilegon-united-tuan-rumah-kalah		Squad list at the end of a match report	✘ No
https://www.cakaplah.com/berita/baca/40351/2019/07/14/gagal-curi-poin-psps-riau-justru-jadi-bulanbulanan-cilegon-united#sthash.VpUg9eMh.JeN745uO.dpbs		Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.tribunnewswiki.com/2021/06/02/ade-ivan-hafilah	Sourced entirely to Transfermarkt	The article itself is just a prose version of his Transfermarkt profile	✘ No
https://www.infosumsel.id/read/2021/05/30/5278/MBU-Langsung-Boyong-4-Pemain?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=feed		Mentioned a few times but no great depth	✘ No
https://banten.tribunnews.com/2021/09/18/jelang-liga-2-2021-perserang-rekrut-pemain-berposisi-striker		Brief transfer announcement, doesn't contain any strong coverage	✘ No
https://topskor.pikiran-rakyat.com/liga-indonesia/pr-1502686230/perserang-kalahkan-pskc-cimahi-ade-ivan-hafilah-jadi-bintang		Match report on game where he scored but no strong coverage otherwise	✘ No
https://www.bantenraya.com/banten-sport/pr-1271285408/menang-2-1-ade-ivan-bawa-perserang-kalahkan-pskc		Refers to same game as above source. Again, he is mentioned in the title as a goalscorer but there is no actual depth of coverage and we can't build an article from this sort of thing.	✘ No
https://ligaindonesiabaru.com/index.php/clubs/singleplayer/liga_2_2020_old/ade_ivan_hafilah		Stats	✘ No
https://live.lapangbola.com/players/25457	?	Stats	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete source evaluation demonstrates that they don't pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 13:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.