Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ag Hill (UGA bus route)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. Coredesat 02:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ag Hill (UGA bus route) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I am also nominating:
- Milledge Avenue (UGA bus route) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- North-South (UGA bus route) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Orbit (UGA bus route) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
These articles are bus routes on the University of Georgia's campus. I can't see how a bus route, even a busy one, passes WP:N. If it was merged to a comprehensive, well-written article on the University of Georgia's transportation system, I suppose that could be notable. Otherwise, delete. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 21:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, Wikipedia is not a directory This is a Secret account 21:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails notability. Xymmax (talk) 21:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to userspace of creator. I'm getting the last touches up on a wiki that is more appropriate to this information and hope to go live soon - but Wikipedia is not the place for this, no matter how you slice it. Move for preservation reasons. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- We normally do that when a person agrees to work on the article to meet it up to standards, not for "preservation reasons" This is a Secret account 23:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. Maybe the user should make a backup then. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's his only edits, and that was back in early 2006 This is a Secret account 20:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- We normally do that when a person agrees to work on the article to meet it up to standards, not for "preservation reasons" This is a Secret account 23:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails notability. Hammer1980·talk 22:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete there is no reason this information should be found in an encyclopedia. TSO1D (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not really notable. • Lawrence Cohen 22:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There was a discussion over bus routes some months ago, and it was decided that they were no notable and all deleted. Some of the articles seemed to be trying almost to put bus time tables in WP. This requires regular maintenance, which is best done by the bus operators. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:49, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Can we merge all three into a single bus article? Alone, they are clearly not notable, but together could be so. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 00:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.