Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliyaa
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aliyaa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. UtherSRG (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Malaysia. UtherSRG (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The references in the article seem adequate to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as references in article seem to all be listicles and/or reviews and therefore do not meet the requirements of WP:NCORP. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the reference in the article are not paid reviews and speak about both the history of the location as a prominent Sri Lankan restaurant and provide non bias statements on the location. The article should be kept. Jana1989sl (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Jana1989sl: Please list on the talk page the WP:THREE WP:SIRS you believe demonstrate notability per WP:NORG. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the reference in the article are not paid reviews and speak about both the history of the location as a prominent Sri Lankan restaurant and provide non bias statements on the location. The article should be kept. Jana1989sl (talk) 01:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Sources are routine local coverage or lack depth, fails NCORP. Reywas92Talk 14:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per nominator Mevoelo (talk) 20:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.