Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Soccer History Archives
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- American Soccer History Archives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. It has been used as a reference by The Guardian, but I didn't see enough to show notability. Merge somewhere? OhioShmyo (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I don't mind the article, I see nothing against it, however it kinda violates on WP:NOTDIR grounds. Govvy (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 19:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 20:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment on preserving content - User:Govvy has me thinking - could we use the research already accumulated on the page (which shows the website is not notable per GNG but still seen as reputable as worth quoting by soccer historians) as a rationale to include a link to the website as a high quality WP:External link on a soccer-related Wikipedia page, maybe history of association football? A redirect to that page might be appropriate as well if it does end up being mentioned in some manner. OhioShmyo (talk) 15:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not have enough citations. Webmaster862 (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.