Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Cahill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of 39 Clues characters. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Cahill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Fictional character with no indication of why a dedicated article is required. Could be adequately covered in the article on the book series. Contested redirect.--RadioFan (talk) 01:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of 39 Clues characters. See also:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Kabra. Airplaneman ✈ 20:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the character is a protagonist in the series; just as important as Percy Jackson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mono (talk • contribs)
Delete Protagonist? Percy Jackson, iirc, is a much bigger selling enterprise than 39 Clues. Or, merge to a list of characters. There still needs to be significant coverage in other sources. fetchcomms☛ 02:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Since the 39 clues task force has just begun, please give us time to improve the articles and stubs. There are some potential for Amy's article, seeing that she is one of the main protagonists in the series, with the other ones being Dan and Nellie. Please, I would ask again, give us time. Thanks. -Mktsay123 (talk) 16:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I would very much ask of you to treat the same way to all the 39 clues stubs. We need some time to get the task force going, thanks. -Mktsay123 (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Echoing Fetchcomm's concerns, I dont see how this character being the protagonist establishes sufficient notability to warrant a dedicated article. There isn't sufficient coverage in 3rd party sources. --RadioFan (talk) 16:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back into List of teams in The 39 Clues for now at least. The teams article is nowhere near requiring a split since it was just split from the main article itself. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.