Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ananta Das Babaji
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ananta Das Babaji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. Guru advertisement. Wikidās ॐ 12:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article certainly asserts notability but fails to follow it up with the needed reliable sources, attributions and verifications. I would suspect the publications are little more than self-published pamphlets. I am open to reconsideration when proper sources are brought to the page. -JodyB talk 14:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even unreliable sources do not verify the claims. Wikidās ॐ 17:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn person, fails notable criteria. --Tomb of the Unknown Warrior tomb 07:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.