Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Stanhope, Countess of Harrington
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Michael Howard, 21st Earl of Suffolk. Daniel (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anita Stanhope, Countess of Harrington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see an ounce of independent notability. Known only through marriages/kinship. WP:NOTINHERITED. Geschichte (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete marriage to low level nobles is not a default sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to one or other of her husbands, who as earls are notable (and not "low-level"). Ingratis (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to an appropriate target, which is what we've done probably 100 times. Bearian (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect to which, if any, husband?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Redirect to which, if any, husband?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Expanding on previous !vote above: redirect to her first husband Michael Howard, 21st Earl of Suffolk, because he has children by her, including the (probable) future 22nd earl. Ingratis (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.