Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artem Khachaturov
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Icestorm815 • Talk 19:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Artem Khachaturov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that the Moldovan First Division is fully pro, a claim not supported by reliable sources at WP:FPL or elsewhere. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - may also want to consider an alternative spelling Artiom Haceaturov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL per his UEFA pages, etc [1]. Cloudz679 19:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Subject fails WP:GNG as he has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Cloudz679 05:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.