Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auckland United FC
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 06:55, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Auckland United FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another case of WP:TOOSOON. Club is brand new after a merger between two clubs and doesn't meet the old WP:FOOTYN guidelines for clubs yet, doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. NZFC(talk)(cont) 02:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NZFC(talk)(cont) 02:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. NZFC(talk)(cont) 02:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - likely to be notable in the future, but WP:CRYSTAL applies, and there's no evidence of notability currently. GiantSnowman 10:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Draft Also felt this should have been moved to draft space instead of sending to AfD! Govvy (talk) 10:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Draftify - as the article was created in Apr 2020, it's likely too old to draftify through normal process but it can be sent to draft via AfD. This team has a fair chance of future notability so that's my preferred outcome. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:TOOSOON applies CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Can't find much in the papers but I did find this: [1] (also [2], not sigcov). SportingFlyer T·C 23:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'm happy if original user or someone else wants the article changed to draft but otherwise it's just a case that of too early. The club will be notable in the future I'm sure, just not now! NZFC(talk)(cont) 02:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete WP:TOOSOON
- Delete: per WP:CRISTAL Dr Salvus 19:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Draftify WP:TOOSOON Nexus000 (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.