Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autophagy network
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 02:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Autophagy network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- SUMO network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
These two articles consist of a long list of proteins, an even longer list of references and some statistical analysis. They have been created by text-mining analysis ("as published in the last 500 newest PubMed entries") and thus constitute original research. I don't see anything of encyclopedic value that could be salvaged into the main articles on autophagy and SUMO protein. MichaK (talk) 09:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both – The core of each article is a gene network created using the Cytoscape computer program and hence constitutes original research. Boghog (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree with Nom and Boghog. FWIW, I checked the creator's other contribs but couldn't find any similar articles. SmartSE (talk) 21:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.