Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azibo Nosology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Azibo Nosology

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:MEDRS. Tagged as WP:COI. Apart from publications by the author of this work, references are scant. None of them even come close to meeting WP:MEDRS. Since the article is about a method to classify, even postulate pathologies, they should. It positively reeks of pseudoscientific psychobabble, so WP:FRINGE, to boot. Kleuske (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.