Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharti Shriji (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (non-admin closure) --Writing Enthusiast ^☎ 17:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bharti Shriji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks wide coverage in reliable sources. The only coverage found at all is in reference to her father Asaram Bapu's involvement in a sex crime. Often family members of the main accuseds feature in the news pieces, which does not make them notable on their own. This article was previously deleted by AfD, and the present one is a very small improvement over the past. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 03:21, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:PEOPLE as well as it lacks significant coverage in the reliable sources except the rape case. CutestPenguin ^discuss 13:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added few more links related to Bharti Shriji. She is herself a well known spiritualist. lacks of devotees, specifically women devotees from India as well as abroad, follow Bharati Shriji. She is known for her spiritual preaches. --Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 18:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:43, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.