Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind Skateboards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 03:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blind Skateboards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company appears to fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Coverage in Google News archives consists of passing mentions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. This book calls it a seminal company, and even in the passing mentions it is treated as a household item (note that Blind Skateboards is also the name of their team), for example [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] — Frankie (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 04:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the sources provided above, as well as this piece in Transworld Snowboarding are enough for me to consider it probably meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Stalwart111 05:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.