Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojana Bojanić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bojana Bojanić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ONEEVENT, doubtable notability The Banner talk 08:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per vote at WP:Articles for deletion/Katarina Kekovic. Piecemeal nominations of members of a large category of articles risk inconsistent AFD outcomes. In the absence of (say) a formal RFC, precedent has largely been to keep national winners, with that plus Miss Universe entry being arguably two events (her state title can be covered by her national one). ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOTABILITY. 23 editor (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – See WP:VAGUEWAVE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete did not even win a beauty pageant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – See WP:DIDNOTWIN. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best for now as this is questionably better for both notability and improvements. SwisterTwister talk 06:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as non-notable, non-pageant winner. Quis separabit? 01:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Soft delete: Many mentions but probably little coverage, even factoring in that foreign-language coverage may exist. I would normally ask an editor here with knowledge of Serbian to comment on this for further notice, but all the editors with sr-4, 5, and N seem to be inactive so I'll just vote soft delete. Esquivalience ^t 17:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.