Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrowed Time (Doctor Who)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be recreated later if multiple reliable third-party sources that meet WP:N are found and included. Daniel (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Borrowed Time (Doctor Who)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, no references. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability or even a source to prove it exists. It only escapes speedy deletion (A3) by a very narrow margin. Fleet Command (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with List_of_Doctor_Who_novelisations if appropriate. Otherwise delete. The present article doesn't even give us enough information to know if the book fits in this list. Fiachra10003 (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge OR Delete per Fiachra10003 - To be honest I'm not sure whether merging is a good idea but if not then Delete. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with List_of_Doctor_Who_novelisations. Its a piece of Doctor Who merchandise, so there should be ample places to perform a merge. Otherwise, just delete it. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand with reference to reliable source reviews: [1][2] and author interview: [3] JulesH (talk) 21:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do not merge to List of Doctor Who novelisations as previously suggested, as it is not a novelisation (the other books listed in that article are all adaptations of TV episodes; this book is an original story). Looking at Category:Doctor_Who_lists, I don't think there is a suitable target for merging. JulesH (talk) 22:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.