Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bosera Asset Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 11:13, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bosera Asset Management

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional , and non-notable Fails WP:NCORP. DGG ( talk ) 09:09, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Bosera is a major firm in China. In my opinion there is significant coverage of Bosera in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the firm in english let alone in Chinese. The article definitely requires work to read less promotional and to add more citations, but should be kept. Seigerman (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:52, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.