Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahmo Dharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmo Dharma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article unsourced since 2008. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 14:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:NOTABILITY as it is a(the?) key text of Brahmoism. Being tagged/having no references since 2008 is irrelevent ie. "Article content does not determine notability" (WP:CONTN). Coolabahapple (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 13:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 14:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:OLDBOOK. Maduwanwela (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.