Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandi Borr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brandi Borr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE. The obituary in the Chicago Tribune appears to be a paid ad. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless the person went by another name, there doesn't appear to be any other news articles about this figure. Nearly all of the other web hits are from social media or just forks of the Chicago Tribune obit.--Prisencolin (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete fails NBIO as written, also WP:NOTOBIT. Ping me if this is expanded with sources that show notability. PS. I did a GBooks BEFORE and got nothing :( --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:04, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources don't seem to exist to support notability.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.