Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C S Burrough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

C S Burrough

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG can't see any reliable coverage TheChronium 14:19, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, didn't see your names up here. New to process.

Per the note below, all newspaper references have been added via Newspapers.com. John Michael Vore is listed, separately as: John (Mike) Vore, Michael Vore, John Vore, J. Michael Vore, John (Michael Vore). Never lived in Kansas, never lived in Montana.

I believe the Author issues have been resolved by my not participating except for minor edits?

Informatics411 (talk) 19:28, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ref bombed promo complete with official portrait. I would more inclined to consider otherwise if the SMH ref was more than a capsule review. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable public figure with bestselling literary works, well written and sourced biography, well improved since first flagged for deletion. QLitBabel (talk) 13:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 04:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.